BACKGROUND: About 240 million patients undergo surgery every year, worldwide. Roughly 50% of these patients report clinically significant pain. Numerous barriers impede provision of adequate management. Lack of evidence about appropriateness and effectiveness of interventions is one. A registry can provide such information, eventually facilitating better management. This paper reports the development and feasibility of PAIN OUT, the first international acute pain registry, established with funds from the European Commission, and presents preliminary analysis to illustrate the nature of investigations that registry data make possible. METHODS: On the first postoperative day, 6347 adult patients undergoing orthopaedic or general surgery, in 11 medical centres in Europe and Israel, provided Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) using a validated questionnaire. Clinical data were abstracted from the patient's chart. RESULTS: Feasibility worked well. Over a period of 1 year, surveyors accrued targeted data sets and entered them into an online browser. Collaborators could receive online feedback comparing their findings about PROs against anonymized findings from other centres. Missing data for the majority of variables were low. Despite considerable variability between institutions, a large number of patients were treated according to the generic, evidence-based recommendations we assessed. However, this was not sufficient to result in acceptable outcomes for the majority of patients. CONCLUSION: The initial development of PAIN OUT has been achieved. From 2013, it continues as a not-for-profit academic project, open to clinicians and researchers worldwide. The International Association for Study of Pain and PAIN OUT will work together to maintain, disseminate and develop the registry.
BACKGROUND: About 240 million patients undergo surgery every year, worldwide. Roughly 50% of these patients report clinically significant pain. Numerous barriers impede provision of adequate management. Lack of evidence about appropriateness and effectiveness of interventions is one. A registry can provide such information, eventually facilitating better management. This paper reports the development and feasibility of PAIN OUT, the first international acute pain registry, established with funds from the European Commission, and presents preliminary analysis to illustrate the nature of investigations that registry data make possible. METHODS: On the first postoperative day, 6347 adult patients undergoing orthopaedic or general surgery, in 11 medical centres in Europe and Israel, provided Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) using a validated questionnaire. Clinical data were abstracted from the patient's chart. RESULTS: Feasibility worked well. Over a period of 1 year, surveyors accrued targeted data sets and entered them into an online browser. Collaborators could receive online feedback comparing their findings about PROs against anonymized findings from other centres. Missing data for the majority of variables were low. Despite considerable variability between institutions, a large number of patients were treated according to the generic, evidence-based recommendations we assessed. However, this was not sufficient to result in acceptable outcomes for the majority of patients. CONCLUSION: The initial development of PAIN OUT has been achieved. From 2013, it continues as a not-for-profit academic project, open to clinicians and researchers worldwide. The International Association for Study of Pain and PAIN OUT will work together to maintain, disseminate and develop the registry.
Authors: Winfried Meißner; Marcus Komann; Joachim Erlenwein; Ulrike Stamer; André Scherag Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2017-03-10 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Karishma Desai; Ian Carroll; Steven M Asch; Tina Seto; Kathryn M McDonald; Catherine Curtin; Tina Hernandez-Boussard Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: M Susan Mandell; Abigail R Smith; Mary Amanda Dew; Debra B Gordon; Susan Holtzman; Terese Howell; Andrea F DiMartini; Zeeshan Butt; Mary Ann Simpson; Daniela P Ladner; Christopher E Freise; Stuart A McCluskey; Robert A Fisher; James V Guarrera; Kim M Olthoff; Elizabeth A Pomfret Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Hua Zheng; Alexander Schnabel; Maryam Yahiaoui-Doktor; Winfried Meissner; Hugo Van Aken; Peter Zahn; Esther Pogatzki-Zahn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M Choinière; M A Ware; M G Pagé; A Lacasse; H Lanctôt; N Beaudet; A Boulanger; P Bourgault; C Cloutier; L Coupal; Y De Koninck; D Dion; P Dolbec; L Germain; V Martin; P Sarret; Y Shir; M-C Taillefer; B Tousignant; A Trépanier; R Truchon Journal: Pain Res Manag Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 3.037
Authors: Mihai Moldovan; Susana Alvarez; Christian Rothe; Thomas L Andresen; Andrew Urquhart; Kai H W Lange; Christian Krarup Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 4.677