Literature DB >> 25132235

Does preconception care work?

Michael M Beckmann1, Tania Widmer, Elize Bolton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, there is a lack of evidence to suggest that a systematic and coordinated approach to prepregnancy care might make a difference. AIMS: To evaluate whether women who receive preconception care through a structured approach will be more likely to be healthy around the time of conception compared with women who plan their pregnancy but have not been exposed to preconception care.
METHODS: A case control study was undertaken of women who attended the preconception care service and subsequently conceived, received maternity care and gave birth at Mater Health Services Brisbane between January 2010 and January 2013. Pregnancy information and birth outcomes for each woman who attended the service were matched with those of three women who reported that they had planned their pregnancy but did not attend the service. Records were matched for prepregnancy BMI, age, parity, prepregnancy smoking status and number of health conditions.
RESULTS: Pregnant women who attended preconception care were more likely to have received adequate peri-conceptual folate, to report being vaccinated against influenza and hepatitis B, to have consulted with a specialist with the specific aim of optimising a pre-existing health condition and to report less weight gain up until booking. Preterm birth and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were less common amongst women who had attended preconception care, and there were trends towards a decreased incidence of gestational diabetes, LGA and fetal anomalies.
CONCLUSION: These preliminary data provide some optimism that a comprehensive preconception care service may positively influence maternal and neonatal outcomes.
© 2014 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health behaviour; health promotion; preconception care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25132235     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  7 in total

Review 1.  A Summary of Pathways or Mechanisms Linking Preconception Maternal Nutrition with Birth Outcomes.

Authors:  Janet C King
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Patient and provider perspectives on preterm birth risk assessment and communication.

Authors:  Martha A Tesfalul; Sky K Feuer; Esperanza Castillo; Kimberly Coleman-Phox; Allison O'Leary; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 3.  Preconception Care to Reduce the Risks of Overweight and Obesity in Women of Reproductive Age: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  EunSeok Cha; Michael J Smart; Betty J Braxter; Melissa Spezia Faulkner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  China's community-based strategy of universal preconception care in rural areas at a population level using a novel risk classification system for stratifying couples´ preconception health status.

Authors:  Qiongjie Zhou; Shikun Zhang; Qiaomei Wang; Haiping Shen; Weidong Tian; Jingqi Chen; Ganesh Acharya; Xiaotian Li
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Informing the development and uptake of a weight management intervention for preconception: a mixed-methods investigation of patient and provider perceptions.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; NithyaPriya S Ramalingam; Kathryn E Wilson; Emily Evans-Hoeker
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2017-02-06

6.  Change in Lifestyle Behaviors After Preconception Care: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Meertien K Sijpkens; Sabine F van Voorst; Ageeth N Rosman; Lieke C de Jong-Potjer; Semiha Denktaş; Birgit C P Koch; Loes C M Bertens; Eric A P Steegers
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2020-05-20

7.  Prevalence and predictors of early gestational weight gain associated with obesity risk in a diverse Australian antenatal population: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  K Cheney; S Berkemeier; K A Sim; A Gordon; K Black
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.