Giovanni Corrao1, Davide Soranna, Luca Merlino, Giuseppe Mancia. 1. Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Laboratory of Healthcare research and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although generic and earlier brand-name counterparts are bioequivalent, their equivalence in preventing relevant clinical outcomes is of concern. OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness of generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs for preventing the onset of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A population-based, nested case-control study was carried out by including the cohort of 78 520 patients from Lombardy (Italy) aged 18 years or older who were newly treated with antihypertensive drugs during 2005. Cases were the 2206 patients who experienced a hospitalization for CV disease from initial prescription until 2011. One control for each case was randomly selected from the same cohort that generated cases. Logistic regression was used to model the CV risk associated with starting on and/or continuing with generic or brand-name agents. RESULTS: There was no evidence that patients who started on generics experienced different CV risk than those on brand-name product (OR 0·86; 95% CI 0·63-1·17). Patients at whom generics were main dispensed had not significantly difference in CV outcomes than those mainly on brand-name agents (OR 1·19; 95% CI 0·86-1·63). Compared with patients who kept initial brand-name therapy, those who experienced brand-to-generic or generic-to-brand switches, and those always on generics, did not show differential CV risks, being the corresponding ORs (and 95% CIs), 1·18 (0·96-1·47), 0·87 (0·63-1·21) and 1·08 (0·80-1·46). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the notion that brand-name antihypertensive agents are superior to generics for preventing CV outcomes in the real-world clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Although generic and earlier brand-name counterparts are bioequivalent, their equivalence in preventing relevant clinical outcomes is of concern. OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness of generic and brand-name antihypertensive drugs for preventing the onset of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: A population-based, nested case-control study was carried out by including the cohort of 78 520 patients from Lombardy (Italy) aged 18 years or older who were newly treated with antihypertensive drugs during 2005. Cases were the 2206 patients who experienced a hospitalization for CV disease from initial prescription until 2011. One control for each case was randomly selected from the same cohort that generated cases. Logistic regression was used to model the CV risk associated with starting on and/or continuing with generic or brand-name agents. RESULTS: There was no evidence that patients who started on generics experienced different CV risk than those on brand-name product (OR 0·86; 95% CI 0·63-1·17). Patients at whom generics were main dispensed had not significantly difference in CV outcomes than those mainly on brand-name agents (OR 1·19; 95% CI 0·86-1·63). Compared with patients who kept initial brand-name therapy, those who experienced brand-to-generic or generic-to-brand switches, and those always on generics, did not show differential CV risks, being the corresponding ORs (and 95% CIs), 1·18 (0·96-1·47), 0·87 (0·63-1·21) and 1·08 (0·80-1·46). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the notion that brand-name antihypertensive agents are superior to generics for preventing CV outcomes in the real-world clinical practice.
Authors: Josephine Walker; Betty B Chaar; Numa Vera; Alvish S Pillai; Jessy S Lim; Lisa Bero; Rebekah J Moles Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aaron S Kesselheim; Wesley Eddings; Tara Raj; Eric G Campbell; Jessica M Franklin; Kathryn M Ross; Lisa A Fulchino; Jerry Avorn; Joshua J Gagne Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Justine Alderfer; Jyoti Aggarwal; Kim Gilchrist; Jose Maria Jimenez Alvir; Joseph Cook; Sang Hee Park; Jennifer M Stephens Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2022-04-27
Authors: Rishi J Desai; Ameet Sarpatwari; Sara Dejene; Nazleen F Khan; Joyce Lii; James R Rogers; Sarah K Dutcher; Saeid Raofi; Justin Bohn; John Connolly; Michael A Fischer; Aaron S Kesselheim; Joshua J Gagne Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-04-03