Literature DB >> 25130985

Laparoscopic hepatectomy is theoretically better than open hepatectomy: preparing for the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection.

Go Wakabayashi1, Daniel Cherqui, David A Geller, Ho-Seong Han, Hironori Kaneko, Joseph F Buell.   

Abstract

Six years have passed since the first International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection was held. This comparatively new surgical technique has evolved since then and is rapidly being adopted worldwide. We compared the theoretical differences between open and laparoscopic liver resection, using right hepatectomy as an example. We also searched the Cochrane Library using the keyword "laparoscopic liver resection." The papers retrieved through the search were reviewed, categorized, and applied to the clinical questions that will be discussed at the 2nd Consensus Conference. The laparoscopic hepatectomy procedure is more difficult to master than the open hepatectomy procedure because of the movement restrictions imposed upon us when we operate from outside the body cavity. However, good visibility of the operative field around the liver, which is located beneath the costal arch, and the magnifying provide for neat transection of the hepatic parenchyma. Another theoretical advantage is that pneumoperitoneum pressure reduces hemorrhage from the hepatic vein. The literature search turned up 67 papers, 23 of which we excluded, leaving only 44. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are underway, but their results are yet to be published. Most of the studies (n = 15) concerned short-term results, with some addressing long-term results (n = 7), cost (n = 6), energy devices (n = 4), and so on. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is theoretically superior to open hepatectomy in terms of good visibility of the operative field due to the magnifying effect and reduced hemorrhage from the hepatic vein due to pneumoperitoneum pressure. However, there is as yet no evidence from previous studies to back this up in terms of short-term and long-term results. The 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection will arrive at a consensus on the basis of the best available evidence, with video presentations focusing on surgical techniques and the publication of guidelines for the standardization of procedures based on the experience of experts.
© 2014 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bleeding; Caudal approach; Concept; Pneumoperitoneum; Theoretical comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25130985     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  38 in total

1.  National trends with a laparoscopic liver resection: results from a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Jin He; Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Kenzo Hirose; Martin Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Matthew J Weiss; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The variations of the middle colic vein tributaries: depiction by three-dimensional CT angiography.

Authors:  Yumi Maki; Masaru Mizutani; Mamoru Morimoto; Tatsuya Kawai; Motoo Nakagawa; Yoshiyuki Ozawa; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Hiroyuki Maki; Kenichiro Kurosaka; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Laparoscopic liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma located in segments 7 or 8.

Authors:  Hanisah Guro; Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; YoungRok Choi; Jae Seong Jang; Seong Uk Kwon; Sungho Kim; Jang Kyu Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  MILS in a general surgery unit: learning curve, indications, and limitations.

Authors:  Alberto Patriti; Luigi Marano; Luciano Casciola
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-12

6.  From Louisville to Morioka: where is now MILS?

Authors:  Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-07-08

7.  A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty.

Authors:  Yasushi Hasegawa; Go Wakabayashi; Hiroyuki Nitta; Takeshi Takahara; Hirokatsu Katagiri; Akira Umemura; Kenji Makabe; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: Will it be more effective and smooth?

Authors:  Chung-Wei Lin; Tzu-Jung Tsai; Tsung-Yen Cheng; Hung-Kuang Wei; Chen-Fang Hung; Yin-Yin Chen; Chii-Ming Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Precoagulation-assisted parenchyma-sparing laparoscopic liver surgery: rationale and surgical technique.

Authors:  Elisa Francone; Elena Muzio; Luigi D'Ambra; Carlo Aschele; Teseo Stefanini; Cinzia Sani; Emilio Falco; Stefano Berti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Laparoscopic liver resection for the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Zenichi Morise
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.