Literature DB >> 25130705

Minimally invasive fetal autopsy using ultrasound: a feasibility study.

C Votino1, T Cos Sanchez1, B Bessieres2,3, V Segers2, H Kadhim4, F Razavi3, M Condorelli1, R Votino1, V D'Ambrosio1, J Jani1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate postmortem ultrasound (PM-US) for minimally invasive autopsy, and to demonstrate its feasibility, sensitivity and specificity, as compared with conventional autopsy, in detecting major congenital abnormalities.
METHODS: Over a 19-month study period from 1 March 2012 to 30 September 2013, we recruited from a referral hospital 88 consecutive fetuses, at 11-40 weeks' gestation, which had undergone termination, miscarriage or intrauterine fetal death. We performed PM-US using different transducers and compared the data with those from conventional autopsy. The latter was performed, according to the Societé Francaise de Foetopathologie (France) guidelines, by experienced perinatal pathologists who were blinded to the ultrasound data.
RESULTS: Complete virtual autopsy by ultrasound was possible in 95.5% of the cases. The sensitivity of PM-US for detecting brain abnormalities was 90.9% (95% CI, 58.7-99.8%) and the specificity was 87.3% (95% CI, 75.5-94.7%). In 20% of cases, a neuropathological examination was not possible due to severe maceration. The sensitivity for detection of thoracic abnormalities was 88.9% (95% CI, 65.3-98.6%) and the specificity was 92.8% (95% CI, 84.1-97.6%), and the sensitivity for detection of abdominal anomalies was 85.7% (95% CI, 57.2-98.2%) and the specificity was 94.6% (95% CI, 86.7-98.5%).
CONCLUSION: This pilot study confirms the feasibility of PM-US for virtual autopsy as early as 11 weeks' gestation. This new technique shows high sensitivity and specificity in detecting congenital structural abnormalities as compared with conventional autopsy.
Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2014 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal autopsy; high-frequency linear probe; imaging; postmortem ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 25130705     DOI: 10.1002/uog.14642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  9 in total

1.  Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy.

Authors:  Xin Kang; Mieke M Cannie; Owen J Arthurs; Valerie Segers; Catherine Fourneau; Elisa Bevilacqua; Teresa Cos Sanchez; Neil J Sebire; Jacques C Jani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  ESPR postmortem imaging task force: where we begin.

Authors:  Owen J Arthurs; Rick R van Rijn; Elspeth H Whitby; Karl Johnson; Elka Miller; Martin Stenzel; Andrew Watt; Ajay Taranath; David H Perry
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-07-13

Review 3.  Dutch guideline for clinical foetal-neonatal and paediatric post-mortem radiology, including a review of literature.

Authors:  L J P Sonnemans; M E M Vester; E E M Kolsteren; J J H M Erwich; P G J Nikkels; P A M Kint; R R van Rijn; W M Klein
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Perinatal post mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a practical approach.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-03-18

Review 5.  Perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): radiological-pathological correlation.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; Neil J Sebire; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-08-21

6.  Maceration determines diagnostic yield of fetal and neonatal whole body post-mortem ultrasound.

Authors:  Susan Cheng Shelmerdine; Dean Langan; Uday Mandalia; Neil James Sebire; Owen John Arthurs
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 7.  COVID-19 in the autopsy room-requirements, safety, recommendations and pathological findings.

Authors:  Jacek Baj; Marzanna Ciesielka; Grzegorz Buszewicz; Ryszard Maciejewski; Barbara Budzyńska; Piotr Listos; Grzegorz Teresiński
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.007

8.  Diagnostic accuracy of perinatal post-mortem ultrasound (PMUS): a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan Shelmerdine; Dean Langan; Neil J Sebire; Owen Arthurs
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2019-11-11

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem ultrasound vs postmortem 1.5-T MRI for non-invasive perinatal autopsy.

Authors:  S C Shelmerdine; N J Sebire; O J Arthurs
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 7.299

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.