Literature DB >> 25129651

Growth hormone tumor histological subtypes predict response to surgical and medical therapy.

Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades1, Nichole E Carlson, Manuel T Borges, B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, Kevin O Lillehei, Janice M Kerr, Margaret E Wierman.   

Abstract

Growth hormone (GH) pituitary tumors are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Current treatments, including surgery and medical therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSA), dopamine agonists and/or a GH receptor antagonist, result in disease remission in approximately half of patients. Predictors of GH tumor response to different therapies have been incompletely defined based on histologic subtype, particularly densely (DG) versus sparsely (SG) granulated adenomas. The aim of this study was to examine our own institutional experience with GH adenomas and correlate how subtype related to clinical parameters as well as response to surgery and medical therapies. A retrospective chart review of 101 acromegalic patients operated by a single neurosurgeon was performed. Clinical data were correlated with histologic subtype and disease control, as defined by IGF-1 levels, and random growth hormone levels in response to surgery and/or medical therapies. SG tumors, compared to DG, occurred in younger patients (p = 0.0010), were 3-fold larger (p = 0.0030) but showed no differences in tumor-invasion characteristics (p = 0.12). DG tumors had a higher rate of remission in response to surgery compared to SG, 65.7 vs. 14.3 % (p < 0.0001), as well as to medical therapy with SSAs (68.8 % for DG vs. 28.6 % for SG tumors; p = 0.028). SG tumors not controlled with SSAs consistently responded to a switch to, or addition of, a GH receptor antagonist. Histological GH tumor subtyping implicates a different clinical phenotype and biologic behavior, and provides prognostic significance for surgical success and response to medical therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25129651      PMCID: PMC4331291          DOI: 10.1007/s12020-014-0383-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrine        ISSN: 1355-008X            Impact factor:   3.633


  40 in total

Review 1.  Keratins in health and cancer: more than mere epithelial cell markers.

Authors:  V Karantza
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  The pathogenesis of pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Sylvia L Asa; Shereen Ezzat
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 23.472

3.  Cabergoline treatment in acromegaly: cons.

Authors:  Leandro Kasuki; Leonardo Vieira Neto; Mônica R Gadelha
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Ultrastructural classification of pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  E Horvath; K Kovacs
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: endocrinological follow-up of 98 patients.

Authors:  I Shimon; Z R Cohen; Z Ram; M Hadani
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Place of cabergoline in acromegaly: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laure Sandret; Patrick Maison; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 7.  Predictors and rates of treatment-resistant tumor growth in acromegaly.

Authors:  G M Besser; P Burman; A F Daly
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 8.  Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update.

Authors:  S Melmed; A Colao; A Barkan; M Molitch; A B Grossman; D Kleinberg; D Clemmons; P Chanson; E Laws; J Schlechte; M L Vance; K Ho; A Giustina
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Growth hormone granulation pattern and somatostatin receptor subtype 2A correlate with postoperative somatostatin receptor ligand response in acromegaly: a large single center experience.

Authors:  Jessica Brzana; Chris G Yedinak; Sakir H Gultekin; Johnny B Delashaw; Maria Fleseriu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.107

10.  Granulation pattern, but not GSP or GHR mutation, is associated with clinical characteristics in somatostatin-naive patients with somatotroph adenomas.

Authors:  Sarah Larkin; Raghava Reddy; Niki Karavitaki; Simon Cudlip; John Wass; Olaf Ansorge
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 6.664

View more
  33 in total

1.  Predictors of surgical outcome and early criteria of remission in acromegaly.

Authors:  Ximene Antunes; Nina Ventura; Gustavo Bittencourt Camilo; Luiz Eduardo Wildemberg; Andre Guasti; Paulo José M Pereira; Aline Helen Silva Camacho; Leila Chimelli; Paulo Niemeyer; Mônica R Gadelha; Leandro Kasuki
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Mammosomatotroph and mixed somatotroph-lactotroph adenoma in acromegaly: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Liang Lv; Yong Jiang; Senlin Yin; Yu Hu; Cheng Chen; Weichao Ma; Shu Jiang; Peizhi Zhou
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Biomarkers of acromegaly.

Authors:  Luis V Syro; Fabio Rotondo; Kalman Kovacs
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Quantitative analyses of T2-weighted MRI as a potential marker for response to somatostatin analogs in newly diagnosed acromegaly.

Authors:  Ansgar Heck; Kyrre E Emblem; Olivera Casar-Borota; Jens Bollerslev; Geir Ringstad
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 5.  Pathology of GH-producing pituitary adenomas and GH cell hyperplasia of the pituitary.

Authors:  Luis V Syro; Fabio Rotondo; Carlos A Serna; Leon D Ortiz; Kalman Kovacs
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

6.  Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas in childhood and young adulthood: clinical features and outcomes.

Authors:  Yuichi Nagata; Naoko Inoshita; Noriaki Fukuhara; Mitsuo Yamaguchi-Okada; Hiroshi Nishioka; Takeo Iwata; Katsuhiko Yoshimoto; Shozo Yamada
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 7.  Management of aggressive growth hormone secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Daniel A Donoho; Namrata Bose; Gabriel Zada; John D Carmichael
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Differential somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 1-5 expression and downstream effectors in histologic subtypes of growth hormone pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Katja Kiseljak-Vassiliades; Mei Xu; Taylor S Mills; Elizabeth E Smith; Lori J Silveira; Kevin O Lillehei; Janice M Kerr; B K Kleinschmidt-DeMasters; Margaret E Wierman
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 9.  Acromegaly in the elderly patients.

Authors:  Maria Rosaria Ambrosio; Irene Gagliardi; Sabrina Chiloiro; Ana Gonçalves Ferreira; Marta Bondanelli; Antonella Giampietro; Antonio Bianchi; Laura De Marinis; Maria Fleseriu; Maria Chiara Zatelli
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Quantitative proteomics revealed the molecular characteristics of distinct types of granulated somatotroph adenomas.

Authors:  Yifan Tang; Tao Xie; Silin Wu; Qiaoqiao Yang; Tengfei Liu; Chen Li; Shuang Liu; Zhiyong Shao; Xiaobiao Zhang
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.