| Literature DB >> 25128988 |
Minghui Zhao, Yande Dong, Xin Ran, Xiaoxia Guo, Dan Xing, Yingmei Zhang, Ting Yan, Xiaojuan Zhu, Jianxin Su, Hengduan Zhang, Gang Wang, Wenjun Hou, Zhiming Wu, Chunxiao Li1, Tongyan Zhao.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pesticide resistance due to sodium channel point mutations has been well documented in many mosquito species.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25128988 PMCID: PMC4261604 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1The distribution of collecting sites of us. ①-⑥ indicated the six field strains of Cx. p. quinquefasciatus in China. RR was resistance ratio to deltamethrin, and the percentages were mutation frequencies of L1035F.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of amplification of the sodium channel gene of . The complete gene sequence was 6450 bp, and the gene’s six sections are indicated by arrows.
The four pairs of specific primers used to amplify sodium channel gene mutations detected in
| Primers | 5′ → 3′Sequence | length (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| Cx-M1 | GATGATCATGCCATCCACGC | 548 |
| CTTCCTCACATTGGCCAGCA | ||
| Cx-M2 | CGACAGTCGAATCTACCGAGGTG | 995 |
| CTTCTCCTTGTTGTTGTCGTCG | ||
| Cx-M3 | GAGCTGTTCATCACGCTCTG | 689 |
| GCCGACAAACTCGAGGAACC | ||
| Cx-M4 | GCCGGATAACGACAAGGGTT | 661 |
| GGGCTCGTTATCACAGGCAT |
Levels of deltamethrin and cyhalothrin resistance measured in
| Population | Insecticide | LC 50 (ppm) (95% CL) 1 | Regression Equation | χ2 |
| RR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | deltamethrin | 0.001 (0.001, 0.001) | Y = 7.412 + 2.371x | 29.78 | 0.019 | 1 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.001 (0.001, 0.001) | Y = 6.819 + 2.356x | 16.76 | 0.606 | 1 | |
| CL | deltamethrin | 0.009 (0.006, 0.011) | Y = 3.028 + 1.475x | 13.34 | 0.648 | 9 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.014 (0.010, 0.017) | Y = 2.898 + 1.551x | 10.63 | 0.832 | 14 | |
| PX | deltamethrin | 0.428 (0.385, 0.476) | Y = 0.842 + 2.284x | 31.44 | 0.175 | 428 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.396 (0.332, 0.468) | Y = 0.610 + 1.517x | 24.84 | 0.305 | 396 | |
| BA | deltamethrin | 0.186 (0.151, 0.231) | Y = 1.314 + 1.799x | 23.34 | 0.105 | 186 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.215 (0.172, 0.264) | Y = 0.761 + 1.139x | 23.28 | 0.386 | 215 | |
| FH | deltamethrin | 1.019 (0.811, 1.268) | Y = -0.012 + 1.439x | 32.20 | 0.075 | 1019 |
| cyhalothrin | 1.291 (1.051, 1.560) | Y = -0.165 + 1.484x | 16.83 | 0.396 | 1291 | |
| ZJ | deltamethrin | 0.036 (0.031, 0.041) | Y = 3.073 + 2.127x | 18.05 | 0.703 | 36 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.042 (0.037, 0.048) | Y = 3.048 + 2.215x | 26.82 | 0.218 | 42 | |
| LS | deltamethrin | 0.312 (0.234, 0.413) | Y = 0.630 + 0.541x | 40.04 | 0.011 | 312 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.641 (0.520, 0.800) | Y = 0.221 + 0.497x | 25.05 | 0.295 | 641 |
(LA = Lab strain; CL = Haikou Changliu; PX = Haikou Poxiang; BA = Qionghai Boao; FH = Sanya Fenghuang; ZJ = Guangdong Zhanjiang; LS = Hainan Lingshui.
1CL = confidence limits, 2RR = Resistance Ratio).
Figure 3Alternative splicing in the sodium channel gene of CX1 was the sequence of Cx. p. quinquefasciatus (GenBank Accession No.: AB453977.1). CX2 was the sequence of Cx. p. quinquefasciatus in China. The dots indicated the alternative splicings. In the 517–570, there were three kinds of alternative splicings (517–550, 542–550, and 542–570); In the 1106–1139, there were also three kinds of alternative splicings (1106–1118, 1106–1128, and 1106–1139).
Gene and genotype frequencies of seven sodium channel gene mutations calculated in six populations of
| Mutation | Population | n | Genotype frequency and gene frequency (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS 1 | RS 2 | RR 3 | R 4 | |||
| V250M | FH | 49 | 61.2 | 34.7 | 4.10 | 21.4 |
| PX | 31 | 41.9 | 48.4 | 9.70 | 33.9 | |
| BA | 29 | 55.2 | 37.9 | 6.90 | 25.9 | |
| ZJ | 31 | 48.4 | 51.6 | 0.00 | 25.8 | |
| CL | 32 | 65.6 | 34.4 | 0.00 | 17.2 | |
| LS | 36 | 61.1 | 27.8 | 11.1 | 25.0 | |
| R436K | FH | 27 | 7.40 | 92.6 | 0.00 | 46.3 |
| PX | 12 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.00 | 50.0 | |
| BA | 10 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.00 | 50.0 | |
| ZJ | 20 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.00 | 50.0 | |
| CL | 13 | 0.00 | 100 | 0.00 | 50.0 | |
| LS | 15 | 6.70 | 93.3 | 0.00 | 46.7 | |
| M943V | FH | 32 | 34.4 | 65.6 | 0.00 | 32.8 |
| PX | 38 | 44.7 | 55.3 | 0.00 | 27.6 | |
| BA | 31 | 32.3 | 67.7 | 0.00 | 33.9 | |
| ZJ | 33 | 48.5 | 51.5 | 0.00 | 25.8 | |
| CL | 32 | 28.1 | 71.9 | 0.00 | 35.9 | |
| LS | 31 | 16.1 | 83.9 | 0.00 | 41.9 | |
| I973T | FH | 32 | 46.9 | 53.1 | 0.00 | 26.7 |
| PX | 38 | 39.5 | 60.5 | 0.00 | 30.3 | |
| BA | 31 | 29.0 | 71.0 | 0.00 | 35.5 | |
| ZJ | 33 | 51.5 | 48.5 | 0.00 | 24.2 | |
| CL | 32 | 37.5 | 62.5 | 0.00 | 31.3 | |
| LS | 31 | 32.3 | 67.7 | 0.00 | 33.9 | |
| L1035F | FH | 35 | 0.00 | 11.4 | 68.6 | 74.3 |
| PX | 38 | 5.26 | 18.4 | 44.7 | 54.0 | |
| BA | 31 | 16.1 | 45.2 | 29.0 | 51.6 | |
| ZJ | 33 | 9.09 | 45.5 | 6.06 | 28.8 | |
| CL | 32 | 3.13 | 68.8 | 21.9 | 56.3 | |
| LS | 31 | 0.00 | 12.9 | 58.1 | 64.5 | |
| L1035S | FH | 35 | 0.00 | 20.0 | 0.00 | 10.0 |
| PX | 38 | 5.26 | 31.6 | 0.00 | 15.8 | |
| BA | 31 | 16.1 | 9.68 | 0.00 | 4.84 | |
| ZJ | 33 | 9.09 | 36.4 | 3.03 | 21.2 | |
| CL | 32 | 3.13 | 6.25 | 0.00 | 3.13 | |
| LS | 31 | 0.00 | 25.8 | 3.23 | 16.1 | |
| E1901D | FH | 32 | 34.4 | 50.0 | 15.6 | 40.6 |
| PX | 31 | 38.7 | 58.1 | 3.22 | 32.3 | |
| BA | 34 | 55.9 | 44.1 | 0.00 | 22.1 | |
| ZJ | 30 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 0.00 | 8.33 | |
| CL | 22 | 40.9 | 59.1 | 0.00 | 29.6 | |
| LS | 38 | 34.2 | 41.1 | 23.7 | 44.7 | |
(“S” = the amino acid sequence of the sodium channel gene listed in GenBank (Accession No.: AB453977.1). “R” = mutant variants of “S”. “SS” = “S” homozygotes, “RS” = heterozygotes, and “RR” = “R” homozygotes).
1SS frequency = SS ÷ (SS + RS + RR) × 100%; 2RS frequency = RS ÷ (SS + RS + RR) × 100%.
3RR frequency = RR ÷ (SS + RS + RR) × 100%; 4R frequency = (RR + 1/2RS) ÷ (SS + RS + RR) × 100%.
P-value of HWE test for heterozygote deficiency and excess confirmed at six loci in six populations
| Mutations | FH | PX | BA | ZJ | CL | LS | All populations | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Def. | Exc. | Def. | Exc. | Def. | Exc. | Def. | Exc. | Def. | Exc. | Def. | Exc. | P-value | |
| V250M | 0.6638 | 0.8045 | 0.8784 | 0.3797 | 0.5647 | 0.8103 | 1.0000 | 0.0729 | 1.0000 | 0.7097 | 0.0144 | 0.9992 | 0.3499 |
| R436K | 1.0000 | 0.0018 | 1.0000 | 0.0018 | 1.0000 | 0.0115 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0008 | 1.0000 | 0.0017 | <0.01 |
| M943V | 1.0000 | 0.0060 | 1.0000 | 0.0218 | 1.0000 | 0.0047 | 1.0000 | 0.0611 | 1.0000 | 0.0020 | 1.0000 | 0.0001 | <0.01 |
| I973T | 1.0000 | 0.0523 | 1.0000 | 0.0218 | 1.0000 | 0.0026 | 1.0000 | 0.0904 | 1.0000 | 0.0175 | 1.0000 | 0.0050 | <0.01 |
| L1035F/S | 0.4900 | 0.5000 | 0.4186 | 0.5748 | 0.5859 | 0.4458 | 0.9620 | 0.0349 | 0.9990 | 0.0012 | 0.2784 | 0.7220 | <0.01 |
| E1901D | 1.0000 | 0.0553 | 0.9902 | 0.0881 | 1.0000 | 0.3579 | 1.0000 | 0.8282 | 1.0000 | 0.2919 | 0.4961 | 0.7498 | 0.3615 |
Chi-squared test results showed linkage between pairs of loci across six populations of (Fisher’s method)
| Locus pair | χ2 | df |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| V250M & R436K | 0.0000 | 2 | 1.0000 |
| V250M & M943V | 10.307 | 12 | 0.5890 |
| R436K & M943V | 0.0000 | 2 | 1.0000 |
| V250M & I973T | 13.680 | 12 | 0.3216 |
| R436K & I973T | 0.0000 | 2 | 1.0000 |
| M943V & I973T | Infinity | 12 | <0.01 |
| V250M & L1035F/S | 13.758 | 12 | 0.3164 |
| R436K & L1035F/S | 1.1216 | 2 | 0.5707 |
| M943V & L1035F/S | 20.486 | 12 | 0.0584 |
| I973T & L1035F/S | 20.864 | 12 | 0.0524 |
| V250M & E1901D | 12.551 | 12 | 0.4025 |
| R436K & E1901D | 0.0000 | 2 | 1.0000 |
| M943V & E1901D | 8.3050 | 12 | 0.7609 |
| I973T & E1901D | 6.0710 | 12 | 6.0710 |
| L1035F/S & E1901D | 16.813 | 12 | 0.1568 |
Correlations calculated between frequencies of sodium channel gene mutations in and resistance to deltamethrin and cyhalothrin
| Mutations | Insecticide | R (95% CL) | R 2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V250M | deltamethrin | 0.054(-0.793,0.829) | 0.003 | 0.460 |
| cyhalothrin | -0.046(-0.827,0.795) | 0.002 | 0.465 | |
| M973V | deltamethrin | 0.022(-0.804,0.819) | 0.001 | 0.483 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.235(-0.713,0.879) | 0.055 | 0.327 | |
| I973T | deltamethrin | -0.240(-0.880,0.710) | 0.058 | 0.323 |
| cyhalothrin | -0.158(-0.859,0.750) | 0.025 | 0.383 | |
| L1035F | deltamethrin | 0.732(-0.197,0.968) | 0.536 | 0.049 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.791(-0.057,0.976) | 0.626 | 0.030 | |
| L1035S | deltamethrin | 0.007( -0.809,0.814) | 0.000 | 0.495 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.040( -0.797,0.825) | 0.002 | 0.470 | |
| L1035F + L1035S | deltamethrin | 0.813( 0.005,0.979) | 0.661 | 0.025 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.896( 0.309,0.989) | 0.803 | 0.008 | |
| E1901D | deltamethrin | 0.609(-0.401,0.951) | 0.371 | 0.100 |
| cyhalothrin | 0.710(-0.240,0.965) | 0.504 | 0.057 |
CL = confidence limits.
Figure 4Linear regression of the relationship between the frequency of the L1035F mutation and deltamethrin resistance.
Figure 5Linear regression of the relationship between the frequency of the L1035F mutation and cyhalothrin resistance.
Figure 6Linear regression of the relationship between the frequency of the L1035 F + S mutation and deltamethrin resistance.
Figure 7Linear regression of the relationship between the frequency of the L1035 F + S mutation and cyhalothrin resistance.
Figure 8Linear regression of the relationship between deltamethrin and cyhalothrin resistance (LC ) in .