Literature DB >> 25128797

On predicting others' words: electrophysiological evidence of prediction in speech production.

Cristina Baus1, Natalie Sebanz2, Vania de la Fuente3, Francesca Martina Branzi3, Clara Martin4, Albert Costa5.   

Abstract

The present study investigated whether lexical processes that occur when we name objects can also be observed when an interaction partner is naming objects. We compared the behavioral and electrophysiological responses of participants performing a conditional go/no-go picture naming task in two different conditions: individually and jointly with a confederate participant. To obtain an index of lexical processing, we manipulated lexical frequency, so that half of the pictures had corresponding names of high-frequency and the remaining half had names of low-frequency. Color cues determined whether participants should respond, whether their task-partner should respond, or whether nobody should respond. Behavioral and ERP results showed that participants engaged in lexical processing when it was their turn to respond. Crucially, ERP results on no-go trials revealed that participants also engaged in lexical processing when it was their partner's turn to act. In addition, ERP results showed increased response inhibition selectively when it was the partner's turn to act. These findings provide evidence for the claim that listeners generate predictions about speakers' utterances by relying on their own action production system.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Joint action; Lexical frequency; Speech production

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25128797     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  8 in total

1.  Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Authors:  Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Interference in the shared-Stroop task: a comparison of self- and other-monitoring.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Janet F McLean; Chiara Gambi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Interactive influence of self and other language behaviors: Evidence from switching between bilingual production and comprehension.

Authors:  Huanhuan Liu; Chao Kong; Angela de Bruin; Junjie Wu; Yuying He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Inner versus Overt Speech Production: Does This Make a Difference in the Developing Brain?

Authors:  Franziska Stephan; Henrik Saalbach; Sonja Rossi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-12-05

5.  Encouraging prediction during production facilitates subsequent comprehension: Evidence from interleaved object naming in sentence context and sentence reading.

Authors:  Florian Hintz; Antje S Meyer; Falk Huettig
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  The Brain Differentially Prepares Inner and Overt Speech Production: Electrophysiological and Vascular Evidence.

Authors:  Franziska Stephan; Henrik Saalbach; Sonja Rossi
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-03-04

7.  Expectancy effects in the EEG during joint and spontaneous word-by-word sentence production in German.

Authors:  Tatiana Goregliad Fjaellingsdal; Diana Schwenke; Stefan Scherbaum; Anna K Kuhlen; Sara Bögels; Joost Meekes; Martin G Bleichner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Same Ultra-Rapid Parallel Brain Dynamics Underpin the Production and Perception of Speech.

Authors:  Amie Fairs; Amandine Michelas; Sophie Dufour; Kristof Strijkers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-06-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.