Literature DB >> 26841263

Persistence, distribution, and impact of distinctly segmented microparticles on cochlear health following in vivo infusion.

Astin M Ross1,2, Sahar Rahmani1,3, Diane M Prieskorn2, Acacia F Dishman3,4, Josef M Miller2, Joerg Lahann1,3,5, Richard A Altschuler2.   

Abstract

Delivery of pharmaceuticals to the cochleae of patients with auditory dysfunction could potentially have many benefits from enhancing auditory nerve survival to protecting remaining sensory cells and their neuronal connections. Treatment would require platforms to enable drug delivery directly to the cochlea and increase the potential efficacy of intervention. Cochlear implant recipients are a specific patient subset that could benefit from local drug delivery as more candidates have residual hearing; and since residual hearing directly contributes to post-implantation hearing outcomes, it requires protection from implant insertion-induced trauma. This study assessed the feasibility of utilizing microparticles for drug delivery into cochlear fluids, testing persistence, distribution, biocompatibility, and drug release characteristics. To allow for delivery of multiple therapeutics, particles were composed of two distinct compartments; one containing polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA), and one composed of acetal-modified dextran and PLGA. Following in vivo infusion, image analysis revealed microparticle persistence in the cochlea for at least 7 days post-infusion, primarily in the first and second turns. The majority of subjects maintained or had only slight elevation in auditory brainstem response thresholds at 7 days post-infusion compared to pre-infusion baselines. There was only minor to limited loss of cochlear hair cells and negligible immune response based on CD45+ immunolabling. When Piribedil-loaded microparticles were infused, Piribedil was detectable within the cochlear fluids at 7 days post-infusion. These results indicate that segmented microparticles are relatively inert, can persist, release their contents, and be functionally and biologically compatible with cochlear function and therefore are promising vehicles for cochlear drug delivery.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 104A: 1510-1522, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocompatibility; cochlear drug delivery; electrohydrodynamic co-jetting; segmented microparticle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26841263      PMCID: PMC5111169          DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  25 in total

1.  Technical report: chronic and acute intracochlear infusion in rodents.

Authors:  D M Prieskorn; J M Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Design-based stereological methods for counting neurons.

Authors:  Mark J West
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Alleles that modulate late life hearing in genetically heterogeneous mice.

Authors:  Jochen Schacht; Richard Altschuler; David T Burke; Shu Chen; David Dolan; Andrzej T Galecki; David Kohrman; Richard A Miller
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  OTO-104: a sustained-release dexamethasone hydrogel for the treatment of otic disorders.

Authors:  Fabrice Piu; Xiaobo Wang; Rayne Fernandez; Luis Dellamary; Anne Harrop; Qiang Ye; Jenifer Sweet; Rachel Tapp; David F Dolan; Richard A Altschuler; Jay Lichter; Carl LeBel
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Shape induced inhibition of phagocytosis of polymer particles.

Authors:  Julie A Champion; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Gene therapy for sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Wade W Chien; Elyssa L Monzack; Devin S McDougald; Lisa L Cunningham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Development of gene therapy for inner ear disease: Using bilateral vestibular hypofunction as a vehicle for translational research.

Authors:  Hinrich Staecker; Mark Praetorius; Douglas E Brough
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Noise damage in the C57BL/CBA mouse cochlea.

Authors:  H C Ou; B A Bohne; G W Harding
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Transsynaptic delivery of nanoparticles to the central auditory nervous system.

Authors:  Mark Praetorius; Christian Brunner; Bernhard Lehnert; Christoph Klingmann; Helmut Schmidt; Hinrich Staecker; Bernhard Schick
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Visual evidence of acidic environment within degrading poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microspheres.

Authors:  K Fu; D W Pack; A M Klibanov; R Langer
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Protein Nanoparticles: Uniting the Power of Proteins with Engineering Design Approaches.

Authors:  Nahal Habibi; Ava Mauser; Yeongun Ko; Joerg Lahann
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 16.806

2.  Engineering of nanoparticle size via electrohydrodynamic jetting.

Authors:  Sahar Rahmani; Sumaira Ashraf; Raimo Hartmann; Acacia F Dishman; Mikhail V Zyuzin; Chris K J Yu; Wolfgang J Parak; Joerg Lahann
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-20

Review 3.  Nanocarriers for Inner Ear Disease Therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoxiang Xu; Jianwei Zheng; Yanze He; Kun Lin; Shuang Li; Ya Zhang; Peng Song; Yuye Zhou; Xiong Chen
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.505

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.