| Literature DB >> 25128480 |
Aline Etelvina Casaril, Neiva Zandonaide Nazario Monaco, Everton Falcão de Oliveira, Gabriel Utida Eguchi, Antonio Conceição Paranhos Filho, Luciana Escalante Pereira, Elisa Teruya Oshiro, Eunice Aparecida Bianchi Galati, Nathália Lopes Fontoura Mateus, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental changes caused by urbanization can cause alterations in the ecology and behavior of sandflies and in the epidemiology of leishmaniasis. Geotechnological tools allow the analysis and recognition of spatiotemporal patterns by monitoring and mapping risk areas of this vector-borne disease. This study aims to describe the sandfly fauna in the municipality of Corumbá and to compare it with the data described in a three-year period from 1984 to 1986 by Galati. A further aim was to analyze the influence of environmental changes on the composition of the fauna.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25128480 PMCID: PMC4261527 DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Geographical location of study area: municipality of Corumbá, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil; 1: Centro; 2: Cristo Redentor; 3: Maria Leite; 4: Nova Corumbá; 5: Popular Nova.
Distribution of sandfly species by sex and ecotopes in the municipality of Corumbá, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, April 2012 to March 2013 (n = 7,370)
| Species | Centro | Cristo Redentor | Maria Leite | Nova Corumbá | Popular Nova | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra | Peri | Intra | Peri | Intra | Peri | Intra | Peri | Intra | Peri | Total | Total | |||||||||||||
| M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | |||
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 0,03 |
|
| - | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | 3 | 0,04 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 3 | 0,04 |
|
| 5 | 17 | 3 | 22 | 6 | 17 | 8 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 111 | 140 | 1,90 |
|
| - | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0,05 |
|
| - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 0,01 |
|
| 1278 | 196 | 456 | 176 | 397 | 89 | 404 | 67 | 91 | 27 | 1070 | 88 | 493 | 71 | 1454 | 227 | 49 | 25 | 215 | 39 | 5907 | 1005 | 6.912 | 93,79 |
|
| 3 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 56 | 25 | 86 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 13 | - | - | 3 | 3 | 198 | 62 | 260 | 3,53 |
|
| - | 1 | - | - | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 2 | 3 | - | - | - | 2 | 17 | 16 | 33 | 0,45 |
|
| - | - | - | - | 4 | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | - | 10 | 0,14 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 0,01 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 0,01 |
|
| 1286 | 216 | 473 | 202 | 476 | 140 | 507 | 97 | 94 | 29 | 1075 | 97 | 510 | 87 | 1478 | 254 | 50 | 27 | 220 | 52 | 6169 | 1201 | 7370 | 100 |
Br: Brumptomyia; Ev: Evandromyia; Lu: Lutzomyia; Mi: Micropygomyia; Mt: Martinsmyia; Pa: Psathyromyia; Sc: Sciopemyia; M: male; F: female.
Number of sandflies captured in the urban areas of Corumbá, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in two periods (Feb. 1984 to Dec. 1986 and Apr. 2012 to Mar. 2013)
| Species | 1984/1986 | 2012/2013 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | % | F | % | Total | % | M | % | F | % | Total | % | |
|
| 1 | 0.11 | 1 | 0.26 | 2 | 0.16 | 2 | 0.03 | - | - | 2 | 0.03 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 0.05 | - | - | 3 | 0.04 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | 0.25 | 3 | 0.04 |
|
| 56 | 6.14 | 74 | 19.58 | 130 | 10.08 | 29 | 0.47 | 111 | 9.24 | 140 | 1.90 |
|
| 3 | 0.33 | 1 | 0.26 | 4 | 0.31 | 1 | 0.02 | 3 | 0.25 | 4 | 0.05 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.02 | - | - | 1 | 0.01 |
|
| 634 | 69.51 | 196 | 51.85 | 830 | 64.34 | 5907 | 95.75 | 1005 | 83.68 | 6912 | 93.79 |
|
| 121 | 13.27 | 50 | 13.23 | 171 | 13.25 | 198 | 3.20 | 62 | 5.16 | 260 | 3.53 |
|
| 34 | 3.73 | 24 | 6.35 | 58 | 4.49 | 17 | 0.28 | 16 | 1.33 | 33 | 0.45 |
|
| 1 | 0.11 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.08 | 10 | 0.16 | - | - | 10 | 0.14 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 0.02 | - | - | 1 | 0.01 |
|
| 62 | 6.80 | 32 | 8.47 | 94 | 7.29 | - | - | 1 | 0.09 | 1 | 0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Br: Brumptomyia; Ev.: Evandromyia; Lu: Lutzomyia; Mi: Micropygomyia; Mt: Martinsmyia; Pa.: Psathyromyia; Sc.: Sciopemyia; M: male; F: female.
Shannon’s Index and (H) Pielou’s Index (J) for sandflies captured in urban areas of Corumbá, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in two periods (Feb. 1984 to Dec. 1986 and Apr. 2012 to Mar. 2013)
| Neighborhood | 1984/1986 | 2012/2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | J | H | J | |
| Centro | 0.4288 | 0.2664 | 0.1752 | 0.0900 |
| Cristo Redentor | 1.1707 | 0.6534 | 0.7385 | 0.3207 |
| Dom Bosco | 1.6201 | 0.7791 | - | - |
| Maria Leite | - | - | 0.0862 | 0.0785 |
| Nova Corumbá | - | - | 0.1929 | 0.0991 |
| Popular Nova | - | - | 0.2830 | 0.2041 |
Standardized Index of Species Abundance (SISA) of sandflies captured in Corumbá, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in two periods (Feb. 1984 to Dec. 1986 and Apr. 2012 to Mar. 2013)
| Species | 1984/1986 | 2012/2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SISA | Position | SISA | Position | |
|
| 0.13 | 5th | 0.09 | 5th |
|
| - | - | 0.31 | 4th |
|
| - | - | 0.31 | 4th |
|
| 1.00 | 1st | 1.00 | 1st |
|
| 0.44 | 4th | 0.31 | 4th |
|
| - | - | 0.09 | 5th |
|
| 1.00 | 1st | 1.00 | 1st |
|
| 0.96 | 2nd | 1.00 | 1st |
|
| 0.92 | 3rd | 0.86 | 2nd |
|
| 0.06 | 6th | 0.42 | 3rd |
|
| - | - | 0.09 | 5th |
|
| 1.00 | 1st | 0.09 | 5th |
Br: Brumptomyia; Ev: Evandromyia; Lu: Lutzomyia; Mi: Micropygomyia; Mt: Martisnmyia Pa: Psathyromyia; Sc: Sciopemyia.
Figure 2LANDSAT 5 Image and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) for collection areas in Corumbá, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in two periods (1984 and 2010);1: Centro; 2: Cristo Redentor; 3: Maria Leite; 4: Nova Corumbá; 5: Popular Nova.
500-meter and 1000-meter vegetation buffers at collection points in Corumbá, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, in two periods (1984 and 2010)
| 500-m buffer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Neighborhood/Year | 1984 | 2010 |
| Centro |
|
|
| Cristo Redentor |
|
|
| Maria Leite |
|
|
| Nova Corumbá |
|
|
| Popular Nova |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Centro |
|
|
| Cristo Redentor |
|
|
| Maria Leite |
|
|
| Nova Corumbá |
|
|
| Popular Nova |
|
|
Mean, standard deviation and variance of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index at sandfly collection sites with radii of 500 and 1000 meters; Corumbá, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil (1984 and 2010)
| Neighborhood | Mean | Standard deviation | Variance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | 2010 | 1984 | 2010 | 1984 | 2010 | |
|
| ||||||
| Centro | 80 | 75 | 69 | 72 | 4750 | 5189 |
| Cristo | 98 | 107 | 41 | 54 | 1659 | 2950 |
| Maria Leite | 102 | 90 | 46 | 68 | 2162 | 4650 |
| Nova Corumbá | 96 | 94 | 32 | 65 | 1010 | 4205 |
| Popular Nova | 87 | 92 | 48 | 68 | 2328 | 4691 |
|
| ||||||
| Centro | 74 | 76 | 68 | 72 | 4631 | 5229 |
| Cristo | 97 | 109 | 39 | 51 | 1557 | 2648 |
| Maria Leite | 102 | 100 | 45 | 63 | 2046 | 3935 |
| Nova Corumbá | 102 | 104 | 34 | 60 | 1175 | 3639 |
| Popular Nova | 93 | 102 | 43 | 65 | 1847 | 4155 |