| Literature DB >> 28902295 |
Wagner de Souza Fernandes1, Leandro Machado Borges1,2, Aline Etelvina Casaril1, Everton Falcão de Oliveira3, Jucelei de Oliveira Moura Infran4, Eliane Mattos Piranda4, Elisa Teruya Oshiro4, Suellem Petilim Gomes1, Alessandra Gutierrez de Oliveira1,4.
Abstract
Biological and ecological relations among vectors and their pathogens are important to understand the epidemiology of vector-borne diseases. Camapuã is an endemic area for visceral and tegumentary leishmaniasis. The aim of this study was to characterize the sandfly fauna present in Camapuã , MS, Brazil. Sand flies were collected every fortnight from May 2014 to April 2015 using automatic light traps in the domicile and peridomicile of twelve neighborhoods and forest. The collected specimens were identified based on morphology according to the valid identification keys. In total, 2005 sandflies of five genera and nine species were collected. Nyssomyia whitmani and Lutzomyia cruzi were the most abundant species. Males were more abundant, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.14. The highest diversity was observed in peripheral neighborhood, with abundant plant cover. The peridomicile presented greater abundance of sandflies, with the predominance of Ny. whitmani . No significant correlation between the absolute frequencies of the most abundant species and the precipitation variable was observed; however, there was a predominance of Lu. cruzi in the rainy season. We observed a high frequency of sandflies in urban area, especially vector species. The presence of Nyssomyia whitmani and Lutzomyia cruzi indicate the necessity for health surveillance in the municipality. Additional method of collection such as sticky trap is also recommended for appropriate faunestic study.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28902295 PMCID: PMC5574625 DOI: 10.1590/S1678-9946201759054
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ISSN: 0036-4665 Impact factor: 1.846
Figure 1Geographical location of the study area: municipality of Camapuã , State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
Characteristics of capture sites, Camapuã , MS, Brazil
| Neighborhood | Characteristics | Presence of animals |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial | · Located in the periphery, 3km from the city; Presence of organic matter in the peridomicile, fruit trees and shade; | Dogs (3) Hens (>15) Ducks (4) |
| Coophavale | · Located in the periphery, on the edge of a cerradão (50m); Organic tree litter (about 5cm), shading; | Hens (>15) Horses (2) |
| Chácara Pérola | · Located in the periphery, proximity to escarpment (250m); Peridomicile with little shading; | Hens (3) Sheeps (2) Horses (4) |
| Pedro Luiz Amorim | · Located in central urban area; Peridomicile without shading and organic matter; | – |
| Diamantina | · Located in central urban area; Peridomicile with shading, presence of fruit trees, organic matter; | Dogs (2) Hens (>15) |
| Vale do Sol | · Located in central urban area; Peridomicile without shading, presence of grasses; | Dogs (2) Hens (13) |
| Isolina | · Located in the periphery, near the break of relief (50m) and cerradão (100m); Presence of trees, organic matter; | Dogs (3) Hens (>15) |
| Olídia | · Located in the periphery, unpaved streets and basic sanitation; Shaded peridomicile, presence of fruit trees, organic matter; | Hens (7) Pig (1) |
| Alto | · Located in the periphery, on the side of a cliff; Abundant organic tree litter in the peridomicile, fruit trees; | Dog (1) Hens (4) Horse (2) |
| João Leite | · Located in the outskirts, near the Camapuã River (100m); Presence of organic matter, fruit trees, grain plantation; | Dogs (2) Hens (>15) Goose (4) Peacock (3) |
| Centro | · Commercial area in the city center; Presence of organic tree litter, banana plantation; | Hens (3) |
| São Bento | · Located in the periphery, close proximity to the Cerrado (50m); Presence of organic matter, shading, fruit trees; | Hens (>15) Bovine (3) |
Distribution of sandflies species by neighborhood, Shannon’s Index (H), Pielou’s Index (J) and Standardized Index of Species Abundance (SISA), in urban areas of Camapuã , MS, 2014 to 2015 (n=2,005)
| Species | Capture sites | SISA | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Industrial | Coophavale |
| Pedro Luiz | Diamantina | Vale do Sol | Isolina |
| Alto |
| Centro |
| Mata | ||
|
| 2 | 25 | 3 | - | - | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | - | 0.74 |
|
| - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.03 |
|
| 1 | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 2 | 0.47 |
|
| - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | 0.30 |
|
| - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.03 |
|
| 3 | 44 | 4 | 1 | 274 | 86 | 178 | 34 | 3 | 48 | 55 | 96 | 1 | 1.00 |
|
| 49 | 330 | 15 | 2 | 78 | 14 | 296 | 53 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 227 | 17 | 1.00 |
|
| - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 0.21 |
|
| - | - | - | - | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 1 | - | 4 | - | 0.40 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| 0,4543 | 0,6045 | - | - | 0,5959 | 0,4563 | 0,7698 | 0,8292 | - | 0,5436 | 0,5859 | 0,7403 | - | - |
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| 0,3277 | 0,3755 | - | - | 0,3702 | 0,4153 | 0,4296 | 0,5152 | - | 0,3921 | 0,5333 | 0,3804 | - | |
Br.: Brumptomyia; Ev.: Evandromyia; Lu.: Lutzomyia; Ny.: Nyssomyia; Pa.: Psathyromyia.
Figure 2Monthly Williams’ average of the most frequent species according to SISA and rainfall (mm), in urban areas of Camapuã , MS, Brazil, 2014 to 2015
Absolute frequency of total collected sandflies and most abundant species according to SISA and climatic seasons, in urban areas of Camapuã , MS, 2014 to 2015
| Species | Climatic seasons |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Dry | Rainy | ||
|
| |||
| Male | 144 | 525 | 0,002 |
| Female | 37 | 121 | 0,050 |
| Total | 181 | 646 | 0,001 |
|
| |||
| Male | 296 | 364 | 0,815 |
| Female | 153 | 297 | 0,163 |
| Total | 449 | 661 | 0,340 |
|
| |||
| Male | 446 | 920 | 0,014 |
| Female | 196 | 443 | 0,014 |
| Total | 642 | 1363 | <0,001 |
*Wilcoxon test.