Literature DB >> 21111358

Self-induction of abortion among women in the United States.

Daniel Grossman1, Kelsey Holt, Melanie Peña, Diana Lara, Maggie Veatch, Denisse Córdova, Marji Gold, Beverly Winikoff, Kelly Blanchard.   

Abstract

Recent media coverage and case reports have highlighted women's attempts to end their pregnancies by self-inducing abortions in the United States. This study explored women's motivations for attempting self-induction of abortion. We surveyed women in clinic waiting rooms in Boston, San Francisco, New York, and a city in Texas to identify women who had attempted self-induction. We conducted 30 in-depth interviews and inductively analyzed the data. Median age at time of self-induction attempt was 19 years. Between 1979 and 2008, the women used a variety of methods, including medications, malta beverage, herbs, physical manipulation and, increasingly, misoprostol. Reasons to self-induce included a desire to avoid abortion clinics, obstacles to accessing clinical services, especially due to young age and financial barriers, and a preference for self-induction. The methods used were generally readily accessible but mostly ineffective and occasionally unsafe. Of the 23 with confirmed pregnancies, three reported a successful abortion not requiring clinical care. Only one reported medical complications in the United States. Most would not self-induce again and recommended clinic-based services. Efforts should be made to inform women about and improve access to clinic-based abortion services, particularly for medical abortion, which may appeal to women who are drawn to self-induction because it is natural, non-invasive and private.
Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Health Matters. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21111358     DOI: 10.1016/S0968-8080(10)36534-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health Matters        ISSN: 0968-8080


  28 in total

1.  Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Sarah Baum; Liza Fuentes; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Amanda Stevenson; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  TRAP laws and the invisible labor of US abortion providers.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mercier; Mara Buchbinder; Amy Bryant
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2015-08-19

3.  Knowledge of Abortion Laws and Services Among Low-Income Women in Three United States Cities.

Authors:  Diana Lara; Kelsey Holt; Melanie Peña; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-12

4.  The public health threat of anti-abortion legislation.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.

Authors:  Liza Fuentes; Sharon Lebenkoff; Kari White; Caitlin Gerdts; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Factors Associated With Use of an Online Telemedicine Service to Access Self-managed Medical Abortion in the US.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Jennifer E Starling; Rebecca Gomperts
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

7.  Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.

Authors:  Caitlin Gerdts; Liza Fuentes; Daniel Grossman; Kari White; Brianna Keefe-Oates; Sarah E Baum; Kristine Hopkins; Chandler W Stolp; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 11.561

8.  Exploring pregnancy termination experiences and needs among Malaysian women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Wen Ting Tong; Wah Yun Low; Yut Lin Wong; Sim Poey Choong; Ravindran Jegasothy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Demand for Self-Managed Medication Abortion Through an Online Telemedicine Service in the United States.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken; Jennifer E Starling; Alexandra van der Wal; Sascha van der Vliet; Kathleen Broussard; Dana M Johnson; Elisa Padron; Rebecca Gomperts; James G Scott
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 11.561

10.  Medical abortion offered in pharmacy versus clinic-based settings.

Authors:  Maria I Rodriguez; Alison Edelman; Alyssa Hersh; Pragya Gartoulla; Jillian Henderson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.