BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity presents a significant public health challenge, but regional, rural/urban, and racial/ethnic differences in patterns of multimorbidity in diabetes are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns of multimorbidity in medical and mental health by regional, rural/urban, and racial/ethnic variation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from 2002 through 2006 PARTICIPANTS: A national cohort of 892,223 veterans with diabetes MAIN MEASURES: Multimorbidity was the main outcome defined as: the measure of multimorbidity and two categorical outcomes, with pattern of medical and mental health comorbidities combined and separately. KEY RESULTS: Among patients, 52% had 2+ comorbidities, 33% had a single comorbidity, and 14% had no comorbidity; 13.9% had both medical and mental health comorbidities, 70.3% had medical only, and 1.5% had mental health only. The odds of having 3+ comorbidities were nearly fourfold greater in patients 75 years and older relative to patients younger than 50 years (OR=3.95 [95% CI: 3.84, 4.06]). Compared to non-Hispanic whites, the odds of 3+ comorbidities among non-Hispanic blacks were 1.67 times greater (95% CI: 1.63, 1.71). Hispanics were more likely to have a mental health comorbidity alone (OR=1.20 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.28]) than non-Hispanic whites. For patients living in rural areas, the odds were higher of having 3+ comorbidities (OR=1.21 [95% CI: 1.19, 1.23]) and of having both medical and mental health comorbidities (OR=1.15 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.17]) compared to urban dwellers. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with diabetes, traditionally disadvantaged groups, including non-Hispanic blacks and rural patients, appear to bear the greatest burden and risk of multimorbidity. Significantly greater odds with increasing number of comorbidities were seen by race/ethnicity, rural residence, and geographic region.
BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity presents a significant public health challenge, but regional, rural/urban, and racial/ethnic differences in patterns of multimorbidity in diabetes are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns of multimorbidity in medical and mental health by regional, rural/urban, and racial/ethnic variation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study from 2002 through 2006 PARTICIPANTS: A national cohort of 892,223 veterans with diabetes MAIN MEASURES: Multimorbidity was the main outcome defined as: the measure of multimorbidity and two categorical outcomes, with pattern of medical and mental health comorbidities combined and separately. KEY RESULTS: Among patients, 52% had 2+ comorbidities, 33% had a single comorbidity, and 14% had no comorbidity; 13.9% had both medical and mental health comorbidities, 70.3% had medical only, and 1.5% had mental health only. The odds of having 3+ comorbidities were nearly fourfold greater in patients 75 years and older relative to patients younger than 50 years (OR=3.95 [95% CI: 3.84, 4.06]). Compared to non-Hispanic whites, the odds of 3+ comorbidities among non-Hispanic blacks were 1.67 times greater (95% CI: 1.63, 1.71). Hispanics were more likely to have a mental health comorbidity alone (OR=1.20 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.28]) than non-Hispanic whites. For patients living in rural areas, the odds were higher of having 3+ comorbidities (OR=1.21 [95% CI: 1.19, 1.23]) and of having both medical and mental health comorbidities (OR=1.15 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.17]) compared to urban dwellers. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with diabetes, traditionally disadvantaged groups, including non-Hispanic blacks and rural patients, appear to bear the greatest burden and risk of multimorbidity. Significantly greater odds with increasing number of comorbidities were seen by race/ethnicity, rural residence, and geographic region.
Authors: Theresa M Marteau; Eleanor Mann; A Toby Prevost; Joana C Vasconcelos; Ian Kellar; Simon Sanderson; Michael Parker; Simon Griffin; Stephen Sutton; Ann Louise Kinmonth Journal: BMJ Date: 2010-05-13
Authors: Karen Barnett; Stewart W Mercer; Michael Norbury; Graham Watt; Sally Wyke; Bruce Guthrie Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Varsha G Vimalananda; Donald R Miller; Cindy L Christiansen; Wenyu Wang; Patricia Tremblay; B Graeme Fincke Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Leonard E Egede; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Clara E Dismuke; Cheryl P Lynch; R Neal Axon; Yumin Zhao; Patrick D Mauldin Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Guadalupe X Ayala; Leticia Ibarra; Andrea L Cherrington; Humberto Parada; Lucy Horton; Ming Ji; John P Elder Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Bartosz Hudzik; Ilona Korzonek-Szlacheta; Janusz Szkodziński; Marek Gierlotka; Andrzej Lekston; Barbara Zubelewicz-Szkodzińska; Mariusz Gąsior Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-11-06
Authors: Barbara I Nicholl; Daniel J Smith; Breda Cullen; Daniel Mackay; Jonathan Evans; Jana Anderson; Donald M Lyall; Chloe Fawns-Ritchie; Andrew M McIntosh; Ian J Deary; Jill P Pell; Frances S Mair Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 2.497