| Literature DB >> 25127687 |
Kgothatso E Machaba, Sinazo Z Z Cobongela, Rebamang A Mosa, Lawal A Oladipupo, Trayana G Djarova, Andy R Opoku1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperlipidemia, a metabolic disorder of lipids, is a well known risk factor of cardiovascular events and metabolic syndrome. In this study, the in vivo lipid-lowering activity of the triterpene (Methyl-3β-hydroxylanosta-9,24-dien-21-oate), isolated from the stem bark of Protorhus longifolia, in high fat diet (HFD)-induced hyperlipidemic rats was investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25127687 PMCID: PMC4246574 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Chemical structure of methyl-3β-hydroxylanosta-9,24-dien-21-oate (KE1).
C-NMR data and significant H-NMR data of the compound
| Position | δ C (ppm) | Type | δ H (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30.4 | CH2 | |
| 2 | 23.9 | CH2 | |
| 3 | 74.3 | CH | 4.25 (1H, s, OH) |
| 4 | 37.4 | C | |
| 5 | 44.4 | CH | |
| 6 | 17.3 | CH2 | |
| 7 | 25.8 | CH2 | |
| 8 | 49.6 | CH | |
| 9 | 145.9 | C | |
| 10 | 34.7 | C | |
| 11 | 118.3 | CH | 5.11 (1H, t) |
| 12 | 28.6 | CH2 | |
| 13 | 43.3 | C | |
| 14 | 51.0 | C | |
| 15 | 31.3 | CH2 | |
| 16 | 27.0 | CH2 | |
| 17 | 47.7 | CH | |
| 18 | 13.3 | CH3 | |
| 19 | 21.7 | CH3 | |
| 20 | 48.4 | CH | |
| 21 | 177.3 | C | |
| 22 | 34.7 | CH2 | |
| 23 | 25.5 | CH2 | |
| 24 | 125.6 | CH | 5.21 (1H, t) |
| 25 | 136.4 | C | |
| 26 | 17.4 | CH3 | 1.61 (3H, s) |
| 27 | 25.8 | CH3 | 1.65 (3H, s) |
| 28 | 21.9 | CH3 | 1.21 (3H, s) |
| 29 | 27.4 | CH3 | 0.90 (3H, s) |
| 30 | 22.1 | CH3 | 1.16 (3H,s) |
| -OCH3 | 59.8 | 3.85 (3H, s) |
13C-NMR- carbon-13 NMR, 1H-NMR- Hydrogen-1(proton) NMR.
Effect of the triterpene on percentage weight change, food conversion, food efficiency ratio, liver weights and adiposity level in HFD rats
| Group | Weight change (%) | Food Conversion | Food Efficiency Ratio | Liver (g) | Adiposity level × 10 04 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 12.12 ± 0.44*** | 0.82 ± 0.07 | 1.23 ± 0.14*** | 3.37 ± 0.17 | 1.17 ± 0.03 |
| (after 36 days) | 41.93 ± 6.29 | 0.21 ± 0.02 | 4.91 ± 0.47 | 2.97 ± 0.03 | 1.17 ± 0.04 |
|
| 6.18 ± 1.09 | 1.30 ± 0.35 | 0.96 ± 0.25 | 4.67 ± 0.06 | 1.02 ± 0.01 |
| (after 36 days) | 13.66 ± 1.77*** | 0.62 ± 0.05 | 1.53 ± 0.13*** | 5.21 ± 0.29*** | 1.06 ± 0.01* |
|
| 6.01 ± 1.57 | 0.75 ± 0.14 | 1.12 ± 0.40 | 4.68 ± 0.21 | 1.04 ± 0.01 |
|
| 10.04 ± 2.72 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 4.43 ± 1.03*** | 5.73 ± 0.18 | 1.08 ± 0.01 |
|
| 3.74 ± 1.20** | 2.17 ± 0.59** | 0.69 ± 0.14 | 4.75 ± 0.14 | 1.03 ± 0.01 |
All values are expressed as mean ± SEM, (n = 4); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the HFD 36 days.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the ND 36 days.
Effect of the triterpene on serum lipids and lipoproteins levels (mmol/L) in HFD-induced hyperlipidemia in rats
| Group | Total cholesterol | Triglyceride | VLDL-c | LDL-c | HDL-c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.38 ± 0.12 | 0.68 ± 0.11 | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 1.14 ± 0.90 |
| (after 36 days) | 1.83 ± 0.24 | 0.79 ± 0.06 | 0.26 ± 0.18 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 1.86 ± 0.07 |
|
| 15.72 ± 1.10 | 1.29 ± 0.54 | 0.28 ± 0.22 | 7.41 ± 0.56** | 14.75 ± 0.19*** |
| (after 36 days) | 49.52 ± 4.83*** | 1.41 ± 0.35 | 0.28 ± 0.14 | 10.72 ± 0.94*** | 6.17 ± 0.16*** |
|
| 34.24 ± 1.50*** | 1.93 ± 0.15 | 0.39 ± 0.05 | 5.85 ± 0.81*** | 30.39 ± 0.92*** |
|
| 7.51 ± 0.97*** | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 4.46 ± 0.82*** | 47.30 ± 0.9*** |
|
| 38.66 ± 3.25* | 0.77 ± 0.13 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 12.97 ± 0.59 | 29.13 ± 0.68*** |
All values are expressed as mean ± SEM, (n = 4); *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to the HFD 36 days; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the ND 36 days.
Figure 2Effect of the triterpene on atherogenic index (AI) and coronary risk index (CRI) in HFD-induced hyperlipidemia in rats. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM, (n = 4); ***p < 0.001 compared to the HFD 36 days; ***p < 0.001 compared to the ND 36 days.
Effect of the triterpene on liver enzymes on HFD-induced hyperlipidemia in rats
| Group | ALP (U/L) | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 73.00 ± 24.85 | 45.90 ± 13.45 | 226.00 ± 95.57 |
| (after 36 days) | 46.10 ± 11.94 | 51.90 ± 10.32 | 289.20 ± 68.95 |
|
| 179.90 ± 34.38 | 78.20 ± 30.09 | 339.30 ± 138.06 |
| (after 36 days) | 249.00 ± 60.40** | 83.80 ± 18.67 | 298.80 ± 55.34 |
|
| 181.10 ± 25.53 | 42.30 ± 6.90 | 161.90 ± 52.22 |
|
| 363.30 ± 53.23 | 48.80 ± 8.28 | 205.50 ± 37.12 |
|
| 108.80 ± 35.03 | 44.11 ± 9.82 | 188.80 ± 52.76 |
All values are expressed as mean ± SEM, (n = 4); **p < 0.01, compared to the ND 36 days.
Figure 3Histopathological changes (200x magnification) in liver of high fat diet induced hyperlipidemia after 15 days treatment with the triterpene. I- liver tissue of the rat fed a normal diet; II- liver tissue of the rat fed a HFD; III- liver tissue of the triterpene (200 mg/kg.bw) treated and HFD fed rat.