Literature DB >> 25127624

Low cost microfluidic cell culture array using normally closed valves for cytotoxicity assay.

Godfrey Pasirayi1, Simon M Scott2, Meez Islam2, Liam O'Hare2, Simon Bateson2, Zulfiqur Ali3.   

Abstract

A reusable low cost microfluidic cell culture array device (MCCAD) integrated with a six output concentration gradient generator (cGG) and 4×6 arrays of microchamber elements, addressed by a series of row and columnar pneumatically actuated normally closed (NC) microvalves was fabricated for cell-based screening of chemotherapeutic compounds. The poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) device consists of three layers: fluidic, control and membrane which are held by surface contact and made leak-proof by clamping pressure. The NC valves are actuated by a thick PDMS membrane that was created by a novel method based on the self-assembly of PDMS pre-polymer molecules over a denser calcium chloride solution. The membrane actuated the valves reliably and particulates such as alumina particles (3 µm) and MCF-7 cells (20-24 µm) (2×10(5) cells/mL) were flowed through the valves without causing blockage or leakage and consequently avoiding contamination of the different cell culture elements. The MCCAD was cast and assembled in a standard laboratory without specialist equipment and demonstrated for performing quantitative cell-based cytotoxicity assays of pyocyanine on human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells and assessed for toxic effect on human hepatocyte carcinoma (HepG2) cells as an indicator for liver injury. Then, the MCCAD was demonstrated for sequential drug combinatorial screening involving gradient generation of paclitaxel doses followed by treatment with aspirin doses on the viability of MCF-7 cells. The interaction between paclitaxel and aspirin was evaluated by using the Bliss independence predictive model and results showed reasonable agreement with the model. A robust, portable, easily fabricated and low cost device is therefore shown to conveniently carry out culturing of multiple cell lines for high throughput screening of anti-cancer compounds using minimal reagents.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell culture array; Combinatorial screening; Cytotoxicity assay; Microfluidic; Normally closed valve

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25127624     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biology-inspired microphysiological system approaches to solve the prediction dilemma of substance testing.

Authors:  Uwe Marx; Tommy B Andersson; Anthony Bahinski; Mario Beilmann; Sonja Beken; Flemming R Cassee; Murat Cirit; Mardas Daneshian; Susan Fitzpatrick; Olivier Frey; Claudia Gaertner; Christoph Giese; Linda Griffith; Thomas Hartung; Minne B Heringa; Julia Hoeng; Wim H de Jong; Hajime Kojima; Jochen Kuehnl; Marcel Leist; Andreas Luch; Ilka Maschmeyer; Dmitry Sakharov; Adrienne J A M Sips; Thomas Steger-Hartmann; Danilo A Tagle; Alexander Tonevitsky; Tewes Tralau; Sergej Tsyb; Anja van de Stolpe; Rob Vandebriel; Paul Vulto; Jufeng Wang; Joachim Wiest; Marleen Rodenburg; Adrian Roth
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2016-05-15       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  Complete experimental and theoretical characterization of nonlinear concentration gradient generator microfluidic device for analytical purposes.

Authors:  Paulo Henrique Maciel Buzzetti; Maiara Mitiko Taniguchi; Nayara de Souza Mendes; Renata Corrêa Vicentino; Jean Halison de Oliveira; Bento Pereira Cabral Júnior; Marcos de Souza; Johny Paulo Monteiro; Emerson Marcelo Girotto
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 5.833

Review 3.  Advances in Concentration Gradient Generation Approaches in a Microfluidic Device for Toxicity Analysis.

Authors:  Nicole M E Valle; Mariana P Nucci; Arielly H Alves; Luiz D Rodrigues; Javier B Mamani; Fernando A Oliveira; Caique S Lopes; Alexandre T Lopes; Marcelo N P Carreño; Lionel F Gamarra
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 4.  Organoid-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems for drug screening and disease modeling.

Authors:  Aleksander Skardal; Thomas Shupe; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 8.369

Review 5.  Microfluidic Organ/Body-on-a-Chip Devices at the Convergence of Biology and Microengineering.

Authors:  Ana Rubina Perestrelo; Ana C P Águas; Alberto Rainer; Giancarlo Forte
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Multi-tissue interactions in an integrated three-tissue organ-on-a-chip platform.

Authors:  Aleksander Skardal; Sean V Murphy; Mahesh Devarasetty; Ivy Mead; Hyun-Wook Kang; Young-Joon Seol; Yu Shrike Zhang; Su-Ryon Shin; Liang Zhao; Julio Aleman; Adam R Hall; Thomas D Shupe; Andre Kleensang; Mehmet R Dokmeci; Sang Jin Lee; John D Jackson; James J Yoo; Thomas Hartung; Ali Khademhosseini; Shay Soker; Colin E Bishop; Anthony Atala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Sepsis.

Authors:  Andrew Teggert; Harish Datta; Zulfiqur Ali
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 8.  Fabrication Methods for Microfluidic Devices: An Overview.

Authors:  Simon M Scott; Zulfiqur Ali
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.891

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.