Literature DB >> 25127524

Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities.

Damiano Urbinello1, Wout Joseph2, Leen Verloock2, Luc Martens2, Martin Röösli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rapid development and increased use of wireless telecommunication technologies led to a substantial change of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in the general population but little is known about temporal trends of RF-EMF in our everyday environment.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study is to evaluate temporal trends of RF-EMF exposure levels in different microenvironments of three European cities using a common measurement protocol.
METHODS: We performed measurements in the cities of Basel (Switzerland), Ghent and Brussels (Belgium) during one year, between April 2011 and March 2012. RF-EMF exposure in 11 different frequency bands ranging from FM (Frequency Modulation, 88 MHz) to WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network, 2.5 GHz) was quantified with portable measurement devices (exposimeters) in various microenvironments: outdoor areas (residential areas, downtown and suburb), public transports (train, bus and tram or metro rides) and indoor places (airport, railway station and shopping centers). Measurements were collected every 4s during 10-50 min per environment and measurement day. Linear temporal trends were analyzed by mixed linear regression models.
RESULTS: Highest total RF-EMF exposure levels occurred in public transports (all public transports combined) with arithmetic mean values of 0.84 V/m in Brussels, 0.72 V/m in Ghent, and 0.59 V/m in Basel. In all outdoor areas combined, mean exposure levels were 0.41 V/m in Brussels, 0.31 V/m in Ghent and 0.26 V/m in Basel. Within one year, total RF-EMF exposure levels in all outdoor areas in combination increased by 57.1% (p<0.001) in Basel by 20.1% in Ghent (p=0.053) and by 38.2% (p=0.012) in Brussels. Exposure increase was most consistently observed in outdoor areas due to emissions from mobile phone base stations. In public transports RF-EMF levels tended also to increase but mostly without statistical significance. DISCUSSION: An increase of RF-EMF exposure levels has been observed between April 2011 and March 2012 in various microenvironments of three European cities. Nevertheless, exposure levels were still far below regulatory limits of each country. A continuous monitoring is needed to identify high exposure areas and to anticipate critical development of RF-EMF exposure at public places.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Exposimeter; Monitoring; Personal exposure; Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF); Temporal trends

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25127524     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  14 in total

1.  Radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures in kindergarten children.

Authors:  Chhavi Raj Bhatt; Mary Redmayne; Baki Billah; Michael J Abramson; Geza Benke
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 2.  Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure in everyday microenvironments in Europe: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sanjay Sagar; Stefan Dongus; Anna Schoeni; Katharina Roser; Marloes Eeftens; Benjamin Struchen; Milena Foerster; Noëmi Meier; Seid Adem; Martin Röösli
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Comparison of statistic methods for censored personal exposure to RF-EMF data.

Authors:  Alberto Najera; Raquel Ramirez-Vazquez; Enrique Arribas; Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Central Railway Station in Sweden and some medical aspects on public exposure to RF fields.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Tarmo Koppel; Michael Carlberg; Mikko Ahonen; Lena Hedendahl
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 5.  Representative survey on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields in Taiwan and comparison with the international literature.

Authors:  Po-Chang Huang; Meng-Ting Cheng; How-Ran Guo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.984

6.  High radiofrequency radiation at Stockholm Old Town: An exposimeter study including the Royal Castle, Supreme Court, three major squares and the Swedish Parliament.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Michael Carlberg; Tarmo Koppel; Lena Hedendahl
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-03

7.  Personal Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields among Australian Adults.

Authors:  Berihun M Zeleke; Christopher Brzozek; Chhavi Raj Bhatt; Michael J Abramson; Rodney J Croft; Frederik Freudenstein; Peter Wiedemann; Geza Benke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Exposure Assessment in Indoor Environments: A Review.

Authors:  Emma Chiaramello; Marta Bonato; Serena Fiocchi; Gabriella Tognola; Marta Parazzini; Paolo Ravazzani; Joe Wiart
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Radiofrequency radiation from nearby mobile phone base stations-a case comparison of one low and one high exposure apartment.

Authors:  Tarmo Koppel; Mikko Ahonen; Michael Carlberg; Lena K Hedendahl; Lennart Hardell
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Electromagnetic interference in cardiac electronic implants caused by novel electrical appliances emitting electromagnetic fields in the intermediate frequency range: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Driessen; Andreas Napp; Kristina Schmiedchen; Thomas Kraus; Dominik Stunder
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.