| Literature DB >> 25126842 |
Graciela García1, Néstor Ríos1, Verónica Gutiérrez1, Jorge Guerra Varela2, Carmen Bouza Fernández2, Belén Gómez Pardo2, Paulino Martínez Portela2.
Abstract
The present paper integrates phylogenetic and population genetics analyses based on mitochondrial and nuclear molecular markers in silversides, genus Odontesthes, from a non-sampled area in the SW Atlantic Ocean to address species discrimination and to define Managements Units for sustainable conservation. All phylogenetic analyses based on the COI mitochondrial gene were consistent to support the monophyly of the genus Odontesthes and to include O. argentinensis, O. perugiae-humensis and some O. bonariensis haplotypes in a basal polytomy conforming a major derivative clade. Microsatellites data revealed somewhat higher genetic variability values in the O. argentinensis-perugia populations than in O. bonariensis and O. perugia-humensis taxa. Contrasting population genetics structuring emerged from mitochondrial and microsatellites analyses in these taxa. Whereas mitochondrial data supported two major groups (O. argentinensis-perugia-humensis vs. O. bonariensis-perugiae-humensis populations), microsatellite data detected three major genetic entities represented by O. bonariensis, O. perugiae-humensis and an admixture of populations belonging to O. argentinensis-perugiae respectively. Therefore, the star COI polytomy in the tree topology involving these taxa could be interpreted by several hypothetic scenarios such as the existence of shared ancestral polymorphisms, incomplete lineage sorting in a radiating speciation process and/or reticulation events. Present findings support that promiscuous and recent contact between incipient species sharing asymmetric gene flow exchanges, blurs taxa boundaries yielding complicated taxonomy and Management Units delimitation in silverside genus Odontesthes from SW Atlantic Ocean basins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25126842 PMCID: PMC4134232 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104659
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Distribution map of 20 sampling sites through three major areas, lower Uruguay and Negro river (UNR) basins, the Río de la Plata (RP) estuary, and associated coastal lagoons and sites from SWAtlantic Ocean (AC) in Odontesthes as follows: UNR- Las Cañas beach (CAB), Yaguarete stream (YAS), Pavón stream (PVS), Baygorria dam (BAD), Rincón del Bonete dam (RBD), Ansina town (ANT); RP- Buceo Port (BP), Hatchery and Carrasco lake (CAL), Pando stream (PAS), Pinar beach (PNB), Solis Chico stream (SCS); Solis Grande stream (SGS); Piriapolis beach (PRB), Sauce Lagoon (SL), Chascomus Lagoon (CHL), Argentina; AC-, Garzón Lagoon (GL), Rocha Lagoon (RL), Castillos Lagoon (CL), Valizas stream (VAS), National Institute for Fisheries Research and Development (INIDEP), Argentina.
Estimates of DNA polymorphism in COI gene of Odontesthes populations from SW Atlantic Coast, Río de la Plata estuary and Uruguay-Negro River basins.
| Base pairs | Variable Sites | S | Number of Haplotypes | Haplotype Diversity | π | Kimura 2P Distance (Tv+Ts) | D | Fs | |
|
| 684 | 40 | 36 | 36 | 0.843 (0.034) | 0.003 (0.013) | 0.007 (0.001) | −2.397 (P<0.01) | −54.046 (P<0.00) |
|
| 684 | 20 | 10 | 7 | 0.696 (0.058) | 0.002 (0.006) | 0.004 (0.002) | −2.797 (P<0.001) | −0.715 (P>0.10) |
S = Average of polymorphic segregating sites; Haplotype diversity (h = gene) (Nei, 1987); π = Nucleotide diversity (Nei, 1987). Corrected Kimura 2P distances (1980). D = Neutrality test (Tajima, 989). Fs = Neutrality test (Fu, 1997). Standard deviation in brackets (SD).
Figure 2Tree topology generated using the HKY+Γ model of molecular evolution based on 43 COI gene haplotypes (H) of Odontesthes from lower Uruguay and Negro river basins, the Río de la Plata estuary, SWA Ocean basins.
Bayesian phylogeographic inference framework implemented in beast 1.5.4 and the estimated divergence dates. Numbers above branches refer to the Bayesian posterior probability of occurrence for clades while bootstrap support values from ML bootstrap are shown below branches. The bottom bar summarizes the time-scale divergence dates in Mya.
Pairwise FST values based on COI data set of Odontesthes populations from SW Atlantic Coast, Río de la Plata estuary and Uruguay-Negro River basins.
| YAS CAB PVS | BAD RBD ANT | RL | SCS | SGS | PAS | PNS | GL | BP | CL VAS | SL | CAL | PRB | CHL | INIDEP | |
| YAS_CAB_PVS ( | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| BAD_RBD_ANT ( | 0.036 | 0 | |||||||||||||
| RL ( |
| 0.085 | 0 | ||||||||||||
| SCS ( |
| 0.092 | 0.023 | 0 | |||||||||||
| SGS ( |
| 0.103 | −0.031 | 0.013 | 0 | ||||||||||
| PAS ( | 0.191 | 0.076 | −0.04 | −0.043 | −0.074 | 0 | |||||||||
| PNS ( |
| 0.040 | 0.024 | −0.042 | 0.049 | −0.013 | 0 | ||||||||
| GL ( |
| 0.088 | −0.026 | 0.022 | −0.038 | −0.035 | 0.036 | 0 | |||||||
| BP ( |
| 0.086 | −0.020 | −0.056 | −0.065 | −0.057 | 0.009 | −0.026 | 0 | ||||||
| CL_VAS ( | 0.206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | |||||
| SL ( | 0.133 | 0.086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | ||||
| CAL ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | |||
| PRB ( |
| 0.195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | ||
| CHL ( | 0.067 | 0.021 |
|
|
|
| 0.173 |
|
| 0.147 | 0.087 |
|
| 0 | |
| INIDEP ( |
|
| 0.122 | 0.092 |
| 0.103 | −0.051 | 0.141 | 0.141 |
|
|
| 0.100 | 0.214 | 0 |
FST significant values are in bold (P = 0.05). (See Fig. 1 and Appendix S1).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on COI gene of Odontesthes populations from SW Atlantic Coast, Río de la Plata estuary and Uruguay-Negro River basins.
| Hypothesis | Source of variation |
| Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Φ statistics |
| a | Among groups | 1 | 8.864 | 0.10574 Va | 21.21 | ΦCT = 0.21209 |
| Among population within groups | 13 | 8.690 | 0.03416 Vb | 6.85 | ΦSC = 0.08695 | |
| Within populations | 139 | 49.855 | 0.35867 Vc | 71.94 | ΦST = 0.28060 | |
| b | Among groups | 2 | 9.588 | 0.09463 Va | 19.44 | ΦCT = 0.19441 |
| Among population within groups | 11 | 7.419 | 0.03316Vb | 6.81 | ΦSC = 0.08456 | |
| Within populations | 138 | 49.539 | 0.35897 Vc | 73.75 | ΦST = 0.26253 |
Two grouping hypotheses among all tested: a) conforming two groups of populations as follows: 1-populations from SL, CL, CAL and CHL vs. 2-populations from VAS, RL, SCS, SGS, PAS, PNB, GL, BP, PRB, INIDEP, CAB, YAS, BAD, RBD and PVS; b) separating three groups of samples as follows:1-populations from CAB, PVS, YAS, BAD and RBD; 2-populations from VAS, RL, SCS, SGS, PAS, PNB, GL, BP, PRB, INIDEP and 3- populations from SL, CL, CAL and CHL. (See Fig. 1 and Appendix S1).
Figure 3Haplotype network (constructed with NETWORK v. 4.6.0.0 software) of Oaph and Obph taxa.
Black dots represent missing haplotypes and circle size is proportional to haplotype frequency. Different colours in each circle indicate the collecting sites as described in the Figure 1.
Figure 4Mismatch distribution in Odontesthes species under the growth–decline population model using mtDNA COI data set.
(a). Oaph and (b). Obph populations.
Estimates of DNA polymorphism based on ten microsatellite loci in Odontesthes populations from SW Atlantic Coast, Río de la Plata estuary and Uruguay-Negro River basins.
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Locus | AT | A | rA | Ho | He |
| A | rA | Ho | He |
| A | rA | Ho | He |
| A | rA | Ho | He |
|
| Obo01 | 71 | 57 | 3.882 | 0,897 | 0,980 | 0,212 | 16 | 3.749 | 0,917 | 0,957 | 0,537 | 15 | 3.526 | 0,865 | 0,915 | 0,074 | 7 | 3.600 | 0,800 | 0,933 | 0,380 |
| Obo26TUF | 19 | 12 | 2.797 | 0,686 | 0,743 | 0,104 | 4 | 4.000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 | 9 | 3.060 | 0,861 | 0,819 | 0,820 | 3 | 1.800 | 0,400 | 0,378 | 1,000 |
| Obo46 | 34 | 30 | 3.093 | 0,810 | 0,800 | 0,420 | 13 | 3.706 | 0,778 | 0,948 | 0,029 | 11 | 2.963 | 0,811 | 0,788 | 0,572 | 7 | 3.172 | 0,833 | 0,833 | 0,543 |
| Obo54TUF | 41 | 25 | 3.200 | 0,740 | 0,836 | 0,009 | 13 | 3.770 | 0,778 | 0,961 | 0,081 | 13 | 3.154 | 0,833 | 0,834 | 0,039 | 6 | 3.467 | 1,000 | 0,911 | 1,000 |
| Obo77TUF | 31 | 23 | 3.541 | 0,941 | 0,916 | 0,773 | 16 | 3.922 | 1,000 | 0,987 | 1,000 | 6 | 2.507 | 0,657 | 0,682 | 0,717 | 3 | 2.600 | 1,000 | 0,733 | 1,000 |
| Odont02 | 30 | 26 | 3.679 | 0,927 | 0,944 | 0,275 | 12 | 3.542 | 0,667 | 0,915 | 0,012 | 12 | 3.177 | 0,722 | 0,842 | 0,000 | 6 | 3.367 | 0,800 | 0,889 | 0,640 |
| Odont09 | 20 | 16 | 3.291 | 0,927 | 0,864 | 0,931 | 8 | 3.111 | 0,667 | 0,824 | 0,289 | 10 | 2.890 | 0,829 | 0,769 | 0,876 | 7 | 3.600 | 1,000 | 0,933 | 1,000 |
| Odont27 | 11 | 11 | 2.681 | 0,814 | 0,715 | 0,029 | 3 | 2.305 | 0,364 | 0,636 | 0,014 | 5 | 1.779 | 0,405 | 0,384 | 0,069 | 3 | 2.077 | 0,667 | 0,530 | 1,000 |
| Odont38 | 42 | 36 | 3.761 | 0,966 | 0,958 | 0,975 | 14 | 3.686 | 0,917 | 0,946 | 0,287 | 11 | 3.120 | 0,838 | 0,832 | 0,103 | 8 | 3.564 | 0,833 | 0,924 | 0,084 |
| Odont39 | 20 | 14 | 3.184 | 0,825 | 0,843 | 0,737 | 10 | 3.284 | 0,417 | 0,862 | 0,000 | 4 | 1.214 | 0,081 | 0,106 | 0,028 | 8 | 3.564 | 1,000 | 0,924 | 1,000 |
Total number of alleles (AT); number of alleles (A); allelic richness based on minimum sample size of 2 diploid individuals (rA); observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity; significant departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P) (P<0.05).
Populations were ascribed to four taxa. Oa included only population from Garzon Lagoon (GL) collecting site. (See Fig. 1 and Appendix S1).
Pairwise FST values based on ten microsatellite loci of Odontesthes populations from SW Atlantic Coast, Río de la Plata estuary and Uruguay-Negro River basins.
| YAS CAB PVS | BAD RBD ANT | RL | SCS | SGS | PAS | PNS | GL | BP | CL VAS | SL | CAL | PRB | |
| YAS_CAB_PVS ( | 0 | ||||||||||||
| BAD_RBD_ANT ( | −0.019 | 0 | |||||||||||
| RL ( |
|
| 0 | ||||||||||
| SCS ( |
|
| 0.002 | 0 | |||||||||
| SGS ( |
|
| 0.007 |
| 0 | ||||||||
| PAS ( |
|
| −0.012 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0 | |||||||
| PNS ( |
|
| −0.005 |
|
| −0.006 | 0 | ||||||
| GL ( | 0.118 |
| −0.014 | −0.004 | 0.014 | −0.015 | −0.001 | 0 | |||||
| BP ( |
|
| 0.002 | 0.018 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0 | ||||
| CL_VAS ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | |||
| SL ( |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 | ||
| CAL ( | 0.257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.018 | 0 | |
| PRB ( |
|
| −0.004 | −0.006 | 0.012 | −0.007 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 |
|
|
| 0 |
FST significant values are in bold (P = 0.05). (See Fig. 1 and Appendix S1).
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) based on ten microsatellite loci in Odontesthes populations from Atlantic Coast, Río de la Plata estuary and Uruguay-Negro River basins.
| Source of variation |
| Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Φ statistics |
| Among groups | 2 | 67.258 | 0.515 | 15.68 | ΦCT = 0.15677 |
| Among populations within groups | 10 | 35.285 | 0.056 | 1.71 | ΦSC = 0.02025 |
| Among individuals within populations | 93 | 250.480 | −0.019 | −0.58 | ΦIS = −0.00697 |
| Within individuals | 106 | 289.500 | 2.731 | 83.19 | ΦIT = 0.16810 |
Three-groups hypothesis among all tested as follows: 1- populations from CAB, PAS, YAS, BAD and RBD; 2- populations from RL, SCS, SGS, PAS, PNB, GL, BP, PRB and 3- populations from SL, CL, CAL. (See Fig. 1 and Appendix S1).
Figure 5Estimated population structure based on the STRUCTURE analysis (K = 3) of the 10 nuclear microsatellite loci.
Each bin or three colored vertical bar represents the estimated membership fraction of an individual into three major population clusters. Name of 13 collecting sites are above bars.
Figure 6NJ tree based on a matrix of Nei's DA genetic distance based on ten microsatellites data between O. argentinensis, O.perugiae-humensis and O.bonariensis taxa (calculated the Populations, 1.2.30, Langella 1999).
Clusters indicate the distributions of individuals in relation to their corresponding taxon.
Figure 7Marginal posterior probability distribution for the Isolation-with-migration demographic parameters obtained in IMa2 for both molecular markers.
Curves are shown for estimates of effective population size in Oaph populations (q0), Obph bonariensis (q1) and ancestral population (q2) for COI data set (a) and for microsatellite data (b). Estimate migration rate in each pairwise comparison analyses of Oaph vs. Obph (m0>1) and Obph vs. Oaph (m1>0) for COI data set (c) and microsatellite data (d).