| Literature DB >> 25126583 |
Zhe Bao Wu1, Chao Qiu2, An Li Zhang2, Lin Cai3, Shao Jian Lin3, Yu Yao4, Qi Sheng Tang4, Ming Xu4, Wei Hua4, Yi Wei Chu5, Ying Mao4, Jian Hong Zhu4, Jianqing Xu2, Liang Fu Zhou4.
Abstract
A2B5+ glioblastoma (GBM) cells have glioma stem-like cell (GSC) properties that are crucial to chemotherapy resistance and GBM relapse. T-cell-based antigens derived from A2B5+ GBM cells provide important information for immunotherapy. Here, we show that HEAT repeat containing 1 (HEATR1) expression in GBM tissues was significantly higher than that in control brain tissues. Furthermore, HEATR1 expression in A2B5+ U87 cells was higher than that in A2B5-U87 cells (P = 0.016). Six peptides of HEATR1 presented by HLA-A∗02 were selected for testing of their ability to induce T-cell responses in patients with GBM. When peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy donors (n = 6) and patients with glioma (n = 33) were stimulated with the peptide mixture, eight patients with malignant gliomas had positive reactivity with a significantly increased number of responding T-cells. The peptides HEATR(1682-690), HEATR(11126-1134), and HEATR(1757-765) had high affinity for binding to HLA-A∗02:01 and a strong capacity to induce CTL response. CTLs against HEATR1 peptides were capable of recognizing and lysing GBM cells and GSCs. These data are the first to demonstrate that HEATR1 could induce specific CTL responses targeting both GBM cells and GSCs, implicating that HEATR1 peptide-based immunotherapy could be a novel promising strategy for treating patients with GBM.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25126583 PMCID: PMC4121097 DOI: 10.1155/2014/131494
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Clinical characteristics of healthy donors and patients.
| Number | Gender | Years | Tumor location | Pathology | Grade | ELISpot response | HLA-A2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 198 | M | 54 | Healthy | Negative | Yes | ||
| 203 | M | 55 | Healthy | Negative | Yes | ||
| 205 | F | 56 | Healthy | Negative | Yes | ||
| 209 | F | 45 | Healthy | Negative | Yes | ||
| 219 | M | 22 | Healthy | Negative | No | ||
| 306 | M | 31 | Healthy | Negative | No | ||
|
| |||||||
| 215 | F | 48 | Right frontal | Meningioma | 0 | Negative | Yes |
| 216 | F | 62 | Cerebellum | Hemangioblastoma | 0 | Negative | No |
| 255 | F | 59 | Left frontal | Meningioma | 0 | Negative | Yes |
| 226 | F | 49 | Sellar region | Pituitary adenoma | 0 | Negative | Yes |
| 261 | M | 21 | Sellar region | Pituitary adenoma | 0 | Negative | No |
|
| |||||||
| 122 | M | 45 | Right temporal¶ | Astrocytoma | 2 | Negative | No |
| 135 | F | 37 | Right temporal¶ | Astrocytoma | 2 | Negative | Yes |
| 217 | M | 48 | Right frontal¶ | Astrocytoma | 2 | Negative | No |
| 246 | F | 30 | Left parietal | Astrocytoma | 2 | Negative | Yes |
| 252 | M | 50 | Right temporal | Oligodendroglioma | 2 | Negative | No |
| 264 | M | 45 | Right frontal-callosum | Astrocytoma | 2 | Negative | Yes |
| 262 | M | 40 | Left temporal | Oligodendroglioma | 2 | Negative | Yes |
|
| |||||||
| 218 | M | 58 | Right temporal | AA | 3 | Negative | Yes |
| 238 | F | 56 | Right callosal convolution¶ | AO | 3 | Negative | No |
| 254 | F | 33 | Right frontal | AOA | 3 | Negative | Yes |
| 256 | F | 46 | Right temporal-basal ganglia | AA | 3 | Negative | No |
| 259 | F | 58 | Right parietal | AO | 3 | Negative | No |
| 265 | M | 56 | Right frontal-parietal¶ | AOA | 3 | Negative | No |
| 127 | F | 42 | Left frontal | AA | 3 | Positive | No |
| 140 | M | 45 | Left temporal | AA | 3 | Positive | A0201/A1101 |
| 156 | M | 48 | Left occipital | AE | 3 | Positive | A0203/A3001 |
| 239 | M | 16 | Left temporal | AA | 3 | Positive | A0207/A1102 |
|
| |||||||
| 129 | F | 38 | Left occipital | GBM | 4 | Negative | Yes |
| 133 | F | 48 | Left temporal | GBM | 4 | Negative | No |
| 147 | F | 61 | Left temporal | GBM | 4 | Negative | Yes |
| 150 | M | 48 | Right frontal-temporal | GBM | 4 | Negative | Yes |
| 151 | M | 30 | Right temporal | GBM | 4 | Negative | Yes |
| 214 | M | 66 | Right parietal-occipital | GBM | 4 | Negative | No |
| 223 | M | 37 | Left frontal-temporal¶ | GBM | 4 | Negative | Yes |
| 224 | M | 59 | Left temporal-occipital | GBM | 4 | Negative | Yes |
| 225 | M | 31 | Left frontal¶ | GBM | 4 | Negative | No |
| 231 | M | 36 | Left frontal | GBM | 4 | Negative | No |
| 241 | M | 58 | Right frontal¶ | GBM | 4 | Negative | Yes |
| 253 | M | 54 | Left frontal | GBM | 4 | Negative | No |
| 132 | M | 68 | Right temporal | GBM | 4 | Positive | A0201/A0203 |
| 141 | F | 12 | Right parietal-occipital¶ | GBM | 4 | Positive | No |
| 220 | M | 47 | Left temporal | GBM | 4 | Positive | A0201/A3303 |
| 221 | F | 39 | Right temporal | GBM | 4 | Positive | No |
¶: recurrence; F: female; M: male; GBM: glioblastoma multiforme; AA: anaplastic astrocytoma; AO: anaplastic oligodendroglioma; AOA: anaplastic oligoastrocytoma; AE: anaplastic ependymoma.
Figure 1HEATR1 was overexpressed in GBM and in A2B5+GSCs. (a) qRT-PCR was performed to analyze the differential expression between GBM tissues (n = 22) and controlled brain tissues (n = 8). (b)-(c) IHC was performed in FFPE tissue sections of 10 primary GBM tissues (left, ×400) and 10 normal brain tissues (right, ×400). GBM tissues had higher staining score of HEATR1 protein than normal brain tissues (P = 0.015). (d) qRT-PCR was performed to analyze the differential expression between A2B5+U87 cells and A2B5−U87 cells (P = 0.0016).
Binding score of HEATR1-derived peptides to HLA-A02 molecules.
| Peptide | HLA molecule | Amino acid position | Subsequence residue listing | Score (estimate of half time of disassociation of a molecule containing this subsequence) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEATR12003–2011 | A_0201 | 2003–2011 | F | 4004.119 |
| HEATR11126–1134 & | A_0201 | 1126–1134 | K | 3690.419 |
| HEATR12102–2110 | A_0201 | 2102–2110 | L | 1883.533 |
| HEATR11411–1419 ¶ | A_0201 | 1411–1419 | F | 1875.918 |
| HEATR1682–670 | A_0201 | 682–670 | K | 1657.907 |
| HEATR1757–765 | A_0201 | 757–765 | L | 1295.433 |
&HEATR11126–1134 was also predicted to bind to HLA-03 and HLA-B08.
¶HEATR11411–1419 was also predicted to bind to HLA-B08, HLA-B40, and HLA-B3801.
Figure 2HLA-A02 binding affinity of six candidate peptides. (a) Flow cytometry results of HEATR1mix. (b) The binding activity of selected peptides to HLA-A∗02 molecule was determined semiquantitatively by measuring peptide-induced expression of HLA-A∗02 on T2 cells with flow cytometry. Data from three independent experiments were expressed as the mean ± SE. Unrelated 15-mer peptides were considered as control peptide.
Figure 3Six epitope peptides derived from the HEATR1 induce the IFN-γ response. (a) ELISpot result of 8 malignant gliomas with positive reactivity. The number of IFN-γ formingspots was calculated per 1 × 106 PBMCs. (b) The positive reactivity among 6 healthy donors and 38 patients only occurred in 8 malignant gliomas (P = 0.022). GBM: glioblastoma multiforme; AA: anaplastic astrocytoma; AE: anaplastic ependymoma. This is a representative experiment from two independent experiments. No peptide stimulation was negative control. Correlation between ELISpot response and glioma grades was evaluated using a χ 2 test.
Figure 4Single epitope peptide derived from the HEATR1 induces the IFN-γ response using ELISpot assay. PBMCs were extracted from 5 patients with HLA-A2+ GBM and 1 controlled patient with HLA-A∗02+ benign tumor. IFN-γ formingspots were calculated per 1 × 106 PBMC.
Figure 5HEATR1-specific-peptide CTLs kill HLA-A∗02+ gliomas that express HEATR1. (a) RNA was isolated from three GBM cell lines and mRNA expression of HEATR1 was investigated by RT-PCR. (b) The values shown represent the mean ± SD of triplicate assays from PBMCs of patient number 323. U87, SHG66, and A172 were loaded with or without peptides and used as target cells in a LDH-release assay. The results showed that 6-peptides-stimulated PBMCs significantly lysed U87 and SHG66 target cells expressing both HEATR1 and HLA-A∗02 but not A172 cells that do not express HLA-A∗02 at an E/T ratio of 10 : 1. (c) Six-peptides-stimulated PBMCs from patient number 323 also significantly lysed the U87 and SHG66 GSCs at an E/T ratio of 10 : 1. Statistical differences between two groups were evaluated by the unpaired Student's t-test.