| Literature DB >> 22847020 |
Surasak Phuphanich1, Christopher J Wheeler, Jeremy D Rudnick, Mia Mazer, Hongqian Wang, Miriam A Nuño, Jaime E Richardson, Xuemo Fan, Jianfei Ji, Ray M Chu, James G Bender, Elma S Hawkins, Chirag G Patil, Keith L Black, John S Yu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the safety and immune responses to an autologous dendritic cell vaccine pulsed with class I peptides from tumor-associated antigens (TAA) expressed on gliomas and overexpressed in their cancer stem cell population (ICT-107).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22847020 PMCID: PMC3541928 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-012-1319-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother ISSN: 0340-7004 Impact factor: 6.968
Fig. 1Diagram of treatment schedule and events
Fig. 6Gating strategy for intracellular cytokine analysis in CD8+ cells. Identical gain and gating was employed on all stimulated, unstimulated, pre-, and post-vaccine plots prior to analysis. Representative antigen-stimulated, post-vaccine plots from a IFNγ-responsive patient (#4) are shown
Baseline characteristics of recurrent/newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients
| Recurrent and newly diagnosed | Newly diagnosed | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Gender | ||
| Male, | 15 (78.9) | 12 (75.0) |
| Age in years | ||
| Mean (SD) | 51.8 | 55.3 (10.7) |
| Median | 52 | 54.5 |
| Range | 26–79 | 34–79 |
| Karnofsky statusa | ||
| Mean (SD) | 87 (9) | 87 (10.1) |
| Median | 90 | 90 |
| Range | 60–100 | 60–100 |
| HLA status, | ||
| A1+ | 6 | 5 |
| A2+ | 12 | 10 |
| A1+/A2+ | 1 | 1 |
| Prior therapy, | ||
| Surgery | 19 | 16 |
| Radiotherapy | 19 | 16 |
| Temozolomide | 19 | 16 |
| Avastin | 2 | |
| Gliadel | 4 | 2 |
| Extent of surgery, | ||
| Sub-total resection | 4 | 4 |
| Complete resection | 15 | 12 |
| First surgery to vaccine time (months) | ||
| Mean (SD) | 7.32 (5.69) | 5.49 (2.52) |
| Median | 5.19 | 4.52 |
| Range | 2.96–23.01 | 2.96–12.39 |
| Corticosteroid therapy (%) | 26.3 | 18.7 |
aScore collected at screening
Attributable adverse events
| Event | Number of patients ( | Number of events ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Total grade 1 and 2 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Total grade 1 and 2 | |
| Diarrhea | – | 1 (9) | 1 (9) | – | 1 (8) | 1 (8) |
| Fatigue | 3 (27) | – | 3 (27) | 4 (33) | – | 4 (33) |
| Flushing | 1 (9) | – | 1 (9) | 1 (8) | – | 1 (8) |
| Pruritus | 2 (18) | – | 2 (18) | 2 (17) | – | 2 (17) |
| Rash | 2 (18) | – | 2 (18) | 2 (17) | – | 2 (17) |
| Redness on skin | 1 (9) | – | 1 (9) | 1 (8) | – | 1 (8) |
| Vomiting | – | 1 (9) | 1 (9) | – | 1 (8) | 1 (8) |
Characterization of tumor for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients
| Patient ID | Ag expression on tumor (peptide HLA restriction) | Biomarker characterization | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLA type | AIM2 (A1) | gp100 (A1) | MAGE (A2) | TRP-2 (A2) | HER2 (A2) | ILRa2 (A2) | MGMT | PTEN | |
| 2 | A2+ | + | + | + | + | + | + | UnMet | RETAINED |
| 4 | A1+ | + | + | + | + | + | + | UnMet | N/A |
| 6 | A2+ | + | + | Wk | + | + | + | Met | RETAINED |
| 7 | A2+ | + | + | + | + | + | + | Met | LOSS |
| 9 | A2+ | + | + | − | + | − | + | Met | RETAINED |
| 10 | A2+ | + | + | Wk | + | + | + | INV | RETAINED |
| 11 | A2+ | + | + | + | + | + | + | UnMet | LOSS |
| 12 | A2+ | + | + | Wk | + | + | + | UnMet | RETAINED |
| 13 | A1+ | + | Wk | Wk | + | + | + | NT | LOSS |
| 14 | A1+ | + | + | − | + | + | + | NT | LOSS |
| 15 | A1+ | + | − | + | + | + | + | INV | RETAINED |
| 16 | A1 + A2+ | + | + | Wk | + | + | + | Met | LOSS |
| 17 | A2+ | + | − | Wk | − | + | − | NT | LOSS |
| 18 | A1+ | + | Wk | Wk | + | + | + | NT | LOSS |
| 19 | A2+ | + | + | Wk | + | + | + | Met | RETAINED |
| 20 | A2+ | + | + | Wk | + | + | + | Met | RETAINED |
Positive (+), negative (−), weak (Wk)
UnMet unmethylated, Met methylated, INV invalid results, NT not tested
Fig. 2a Correlation of quantitative antigen expression on primary tumor from ND patients with progression-free survival (n = 13). Logarithmic plots of antigen expression determined by qRT-PCR (see “Patients and methods”) showed correlations of increasing antigen expression with longer progression-free survival times (PFS). Antigen expression was measured from fresh-frozen samples and calculated relative to GAPDH. b Correlation of quantitative antigen expression on primary tumor from ND patients with overall survival (n = 13). Logarithmic plots of antigen expression determined by qRTPCR (see “Patients and methods”) showed correlations of increasing antigen expression with longer overall survival time (OS)
Fig. 3Downregulation of target antigens in recurrent tumors from HLA-A2+ patients. Antigen expression was from FFPE samples and calculated relative to GADPH. Significant downregulation post-vaccine of A2 epitopes gp100, HER2, and IL13Rα2 relative to upregulations was observed (p = 0.023, Fisher’s exact test). Downregulation of the HLA-A1 antigen, AIM2, was not significant (p = 0.21) in these patients
Fig. 4CD133 expression by RT-PCR in primary tumor and samples from subsequent surgeries from newly diagnosed and recurrent patients. Expression is from FFPE samples and calculated relative to GADPH as described in “Patients and methods”. The sample for Patient 19 was negative for tumor
Demographics and survival and immune response for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients
| Patient ID | Age | Sex | Site | Extent of resection | Time to progression (months) | Survived time (months) | Immune responseb
| Karnofsky scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 64 | M | R temporal parietal | Complete | 11.15 | 28.60 | 0.76, 0.65 | 100 |
| 4 | 46 | M | L frontal | Complete | 60.95a | 60.95a |
| 90 |
| 6 | 56 | F | L temporal | Complete | 66.51a | 66.51a | 1.03, 0.96 | 100 |
| 7 | 61 | F | R frontal | Complete | 60.10a | 60.10a |
| 90 |
| 9 | 51 | M | R anterior temporal | Complete | 6.87 | 19.53 | 0.67, 0.95 | 90 |
| 10 | 47 | M | L frontoparietal | Complete | 15.98 | 53.03a | 1.49, 1.00 | 90 |
| 11 | 53 | F | R temporal | Sub-total | 12.62 | 25.91 | 0.61, 0.74 | 90 |
| 12 | 65 | M | R temporal | Complete | 8.25 | 22.55 | 0.43, 0.49 | 90 |
| 13 | 60 | M | L temporal | Complete | 29.0 | 38.37 |
| 90 |
| 14 | 44 | M | R temporoparietal | Complete | 49.38* | 49.38* | 0.46, | 80 |
| 15 | 34 | M | R parietal | Complete | 48.66a | 48.66a | 0.43, 0.82 | 90 |
| 16 | 63 | M | L parietal | Sub-total | 17.72 | 32.42 | 1.07, 1.18 | 60 |
| 17 | 79 | M | R frontal | Sub-total | 11.28 | 15.98 | 0.62, | 70 |
| 18 | 52 | F | Bifrontal | Complete | 8.88 | 33.99 | 1.21, 1.01 | 90 |
| 19 | 48 | M | L Frontal | Complete | 47.64a | 47.64a | 0.56, 0.91 | 80 |
| 20 | 62 | M | L Temporal | Sub-total | 7.27 | 41.82a | NT | 90 |
aProgression/mortality has not been observed for these patients
bIFNγhi = IFNγ+ in CD8hi gate; IFNγlo = IFNγ+ in CD8lo gate
cFresh CD8+ cells, no in vitro stimulation
dAt screening
Bold values indicate positive immune response greater than 1.5
Progression-free and overall survival in months for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients
| Time in months | % Survival (95 % CI) |
|---|---|
| Progression-free survival | |
| 6 | 100 |
| 12 | 62.5 (34.9, 81.1) |
| 18 | 43.8 (19.8, 66.0) |
| 24 | 43.8 (19.8, 66.0) |
| Median | 16.9 (8.9, 49.8) |
| Overall survival | |
| 6 | 100 |
| 12 | 100 |
| 18 | 93.7 (63.2, 99.1) |
| 24 | 80.3 (58.6, 96.7) |
| 36 | 55.6 (28.6, 75.9) |
| Median | 38.4 (25.9, 40.7) |
CI confidence interval
Fig. 5a Kaplan–Meier estimates of progression-free survival for newly diagnosed patients (n = 16). Dotted lines illustrate the 95 % confidence intervals, and hash marks denote censored patients. b Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival for newly diagnosed patients (n = 16). Dotted lines illustrate the 95 % confidence intervals, and hash marks denote censored patients