Literature DB >> 20466370

Pressure ulcers: development and psychometric evaluation of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument (APuP).

D Beeckman1, T Defloor, L Demarré, A Van Hecke, K Vanderwee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers continue to be a significant problem in hospitals, nursing homes and community care settings. Pressure ulcer incidence is widely accepted as an indicator for the quality of care. Negative attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention may result in suboptimal preventive care. A reliable and valid instrument to assess attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention is lacking. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Attitude towards Pressure ulcer Prevention instrument (APuP).
DESIGN: Prospective psychometric instrument validation study.
METHODS: A literature review was performed to design the instrument. Content validity was evaluated by nine European pressure ulcer experts and five experts in psychometric instrument validation in a double Delphi procedure. A convenience sample of 258 nurses and 291 nursing students from Belgium and The Netherlands participated in order to evaluate construct validity and stability reliability of the instrument. The data were collected between February and May 2008.
RESULTS: A factor analysis indicated the construct of a 13 item instrument in a five factor solution: (1) attitude towards personal competency to prevent pressure ulcers (three items); (2) attitude towards the priority of pressure ulcer prevention (three items); (3) attitude towards the impact of pressure ulcers (three items); (4) attitude towards personal responsibility in pressure ulcer prevention (two items); and (5) attitude towards confidence in the effectiveness of prevention (two items). This five factor solution accounted for 61.4% of the variance in responses related to attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention. All items demonstrated factor loadings over 0.60. The instrument produced similar results during stability testing [ICC=0.88 (95% CI=0.84-0.91, P<0.001)]. For the total instrument, the internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha) was 0.79.
CONCLUSION: The APuP is a psychometrically sound instrument that can be used to effectively assess attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention in patient care, education, and research. In further research, the association between attitude, knowledge and clinical performance should be explored. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20466370     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  15 in total

1.  Getting evidence-based pressure ulcer prevention into practice: a multi-faceted unit-tailored intervention in a hospital setting.

Authors:  Eva Sving; Marieann Högman; Anna-Greta Mamhidir; Lena Gunningberg
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the APuP instrument.

Authors:  Jan Florin; Carina Bååth; Lena Gunningberg; Gunilla Mårtensson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Design and psychometric testing of the attitude towards the prevention of incontinence-associated dermatitis instrument (APrIAD).

Authors:  Nele Van Damme; Ann Van Hecke; Annelies Himpens; Sofie Verhaeghe; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Operating room nurses' self-reported knowledge and attitude on perioperative pressure injury.

Authors:  Betty Peck Chui Khong; Bong Chee Goh; Lai Yee Phang; Thamilselvi David
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  A study on the nursing knowledge, attitude, and performance towards pressure ulcer prevention among nurses in Korea long-term care facilities.

Authors:  Jung Y Kim; Yun J Lee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Development and psychometric evaluation of the patient knowledge of, and attitudes and behaviours towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument (KPUP).

Authors:  Emer Shanley; Zena Moore; Declan Patton; Tom O Connor; Pinar Avsar; Linda Nugent; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Reduced pressure for fewer pressure ulcers: can real-time feedback of interface pressure optimise repositioning in bed?

Authors:  Lena Gunningberg; Cheryl Carli
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  Consistent practices in pressure ulcer prevention based on international care guidelines: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Elina Haavisto; Minna Stolt; Pauli Puukka; Teija Korhonen; Emilia Kielo-Viljamaa
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.099

9.  Nurses' Knowledge and Attitudes towards Prevention of Pressure Ulcers.

Authors:  Beáta Grešš Halász; Anna Bérešová; Ľubomíra Tkáčová; Dagmar Magurová; Ľubomíra Lizáková
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument.

Authors:  María Dolores López-Franco; Laura Parra-Anguita; Inés María Comino-Sanz; Pedro L Pancorbo-Hidalgo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.