Literature DB >> 25124151

Cochlear length determination using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a clinical setting.

Waldemar Würfel1, Heinrich Lanfermann2, Thomas Lenarz3, Omid Majdani3.   

Abstract

Indications for cochlear implants are determined by audiological and medical considerations. Clinical imaging is therefore an integral element for anatomical evaluation in terms of medical considerations. Several authors have discussed the variability of cochlear shape, especially cochlear length. Cochlear length is, however, an increasingly recognized parameter in terms of preoperative evaluation. This study introduces a methodology to determine individual cochlear length in clinical setting by using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Cochlear length determination was performed retrospectively with an OsiriX curved 3D Multiplanar Reconstruction tool on subjects who underwent temporal bone imaging from January 2011 to February 2013. Cochlear length was defined as the spiral route from the center-distal point of the bony round window along the lateral wall towards the helicotrema, which is the endpoint of the measurement. Cochlear length was measured in 436 temporal bones (218 left ears, 218 right ears, 218 subjects). The mean cochlear length was 37.6 mm (SD: ± 1.93 mm), median was 37.6 mm, range 32-43.5 mm. The cochlear length had a normal distribution. A significant difference was found between cochlear length by gender (p < .0001), but not between the left and right cochlea (p = .301) or according to age. Consideration of the cochlear length in clinical data may be an insufficiently represented parameter in cochlear implant treatment. Literature shows the impact of electrode insertion depth on residual hearing preservation and speech performance. Individual evaluation of the cochlear implant electrode choice may be the next step in personalized cochlear implant treatment as a valuable addition to existing audiological and surgical evaluation. The cochlear length determination methodology presented herein is a reproducible and clinically available parameter. Indeed, revealing a significant cochlear length span width, especially according to gender differences, may be assumed as hardly ignorable.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25124151     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  42 in total

1.  [Objective frequency-specific measurement of hearing threshold using narrow-band chirp stimuli with level-adaptive simultaneous masking].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Measuring the cochlea and cochlear implant electrode depth.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Guenette
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Daniel Schurzig; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  First use of flat-panel computed tomography during cochlear implant surgery : Perspectives for the use of advanced therapies in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  N Rotter; B Schmitz; F Sommer; S Röhrer; P J Schuler; F Bischof; M O Scheithauer; T K Hoffmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Insertion trauma of a cochlear implant electrode array with Nitinol inlay.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Lenka Harbach; Nick Pawsey; Marcel Kluge; Peter Erfurt; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.

Authors:  M C Ketterer; A Aschendorff; S Arndt; F Hassepass; T Wesarg; R Laszig; R Beck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Marcel Kluge; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Klawitter; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  [Pathophysiology of hearing loss : Classification and treatment options].

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Is Cochlear Length Related to Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Preliminary Data.

Authors:  Mehmet Bilgin Eser; Başak Atalay; Mahmut Tayyar Kalcıoğlu
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.