Literature DB >> 25123852

The pros and cons of funnel plots as an aid to risk communication and patient decision making.

Tim Rakow1, Rebecca J Wright, David J Spiegelhalter, Catherine Bull.   

Abstract

Funnel plots, which simultaneously display a sample statistic and the corresponding sample size for multiple cases, have a range of applications. In medicine, they are used to display treatment outcome rates and caseload volume by institution, which can inform strategic decisions about health care delivery. We investigated lay people's understanding of such plots and explored their suitability as an aid to individual treatment decisions. In two studies, 172 participants answered objective questions about funnel plots representing the surgical outcomes (survival or mortality rates) of institutions varying in caseload, and indicated their preferred institutions. Accuracy for extracting objective information was high, unless question phrasing was inconsistent with the plot's survival/mortality framing, or participants had low numeracy levels. Participants integrated caseload-volume and outcome-rate data when forming preferences, but were influenced by reference lines on the plot to make inappropriate discriminations between institutions with similar outcome rates. With careful choice of accompanying language, funnel plots can be readily understood and are therefore a useful tool for communicating risk. However, they are less effective as a decision aid for individual patient's treatment decisions, and we recommend refinements to the standard presentation of the plots if they are to be used for that purpose.
© 2014 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian shrinkage estimation; Decision making; decision aids; informed consent; inter-institutional comparison; numeracy; sample-size neglect; subjective numeracy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123852     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  6 in total

1.  Medication Use and Clinical Outcomes by the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing Medicines Program: Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Rawa Kamaran Ismail; Jesper van Breeschoten; Silvia van der Flier; Caspar van Loosen; Anna Maria Gerdina Pasmooij; Maaike van Dartel; Alfons van den Eertwegh; Anthonius de Boer; Michel Wouters; Doranne Hilarius
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 7.076

2.  Funnel plots and choropleth maps in cancer risk communication: a comparison of tools for disseminating population-based incidence data to stakeholders.

Authors:  Walter Mazzucco; Rosanna Cusimano; Maurizio Zarcone; Sergio Mazzola; Francesco Vitale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Guidelines on constructing funnel plots for quality indicators: A case study on mortality in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Ilona Wm Verburg; Rebecca Holman; Niels Peek; Ameen Abu-Hanna; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.021

4.  Enhancing feedback on performance measures: the difference in outlier detection using a binary versus continuous outcome funnel plot and implications for quality improvement.

Authors:  Laurien Kuhrij; Erik van Zwet; Renske van den Berg-Vos; Paul Nederkoorn; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 7.035

5.  The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.

Authors:  Dominic Balog-Way; Katherine McComas; John Besley
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Quality of life measurement in community-based aged care - understanding variation between clients and between care service providers.

Authors:  Joyce Siette; Mikaela L Jorgensen; Andrew Georgiou; Laura Dodds; Tom McClean; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.921

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.