Literature DB >> 25123762

Short implant in limited bone volume.

David Nisand, Franck Renouard.   

Abstract

Rehabilitation of severely resorbed jaws with dental implants remains a surgical and prosthetic challenge for clinicians. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the available data on short-length implants and discuss their indications and limitations in daily clinical practice. A structured review of MEDLINE and a manual search were conducted. Thirty-two case series devoted to short-length implants, 14 reviews and 3 randomized controlled trials were identified. Of this group of papers, we can conclude that short-length implants can be successfully used to support single and multiple fixed reconstructions in posterior atrophied jaws, even in those with increased crown-to-implant ratios. The use of short-length implants allows treatment of patients who are unable to undergo complex surgical techniques for medical, anatomic or financial reasons. Moreover, the use of short-length implants in daily clinical practice reduces the need for complex surgeries, thus reducing morbidity, cost and treatment time. The use of short implants promotes the new concept of stress-minimizing surgery, allowing the surgeon to focus more on the correct three-dimensional positioning of the implant.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123762     DOI: 10.1111/prd.12053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Periodontol 2000        ISSN: 0906-6713            Impact factor:   7.589


  25 in total

Review 1.  Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry.

Authors:  Neha Jain; Manisha Gulati; Meenu Garg; Chetan Pathak
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

Review 2.  Short implants versus bone grafting and standard-length implants placement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juan A V Palacios; Jaime Jiménez Garcia; João M M Caramês; Marc Quirynen; Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Toledano; Enrique Fernández-Romero; Cristina Vallecillo; Raquel Toledano; María T Osorio; Marta Vallecillo-Rivas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Jacopo Pighi; Mauro Marincola; Giovanni Corrocher; Miguel Simancas-Pallares; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-07-02

5.  Comparative evaluation of the stability of two different dental implant designs and surgical protocols-a pilot study.

Authors:  David E Simmons; Pooja Maney; Austin G Teitelbaum; Susan Billiot; Lomesh J Popat; A Archontia Palaiologou
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-05-02

6.  Immediate Post-Extraction Short Implant Placement with Immediate Loading and without Extraction of an Impacted Maxillary Canine: Two Case Reports.

Authors:  José Antonio Moreno-Rodríguez; Julia Guerrero-Gironés; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lozano; Miguel Ramón Pecci-Lloret
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Helle Baungaard Nielsen; Søren Schou; Niels Henrik Bruun; Thomas Starch-Jensen
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-16

8.  Immediate Nonfunctional Loading of Two Single-Maxillary Postextractive Implants: 6-Year Postloading Results of Two Case Reports.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ariano; Manuele Mancini; Andrea Cardi; Roberta Condò; Loredana Cerroni; Guido Pasquantonio
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-05-16

9.  Comparing Short Dental Implants to Standard Dental Implants: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amir Reza Rokn; Abbasali Keshtkar; Abbas Monzavi; Kazem Hashemi; Tahereh Bitaraf
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2018-01-18

10.  The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.