Literature DB >> 25123685

Training endosonographers in cytopathology: improving the results of EUS-guided FNA.

Shyam Varadarajulu1, Bronte A Holt1, Ji Young Bang2, Muhammad K Hasan1, Amy Logue1, Ashutosh Tamhane3, Robert H Hawes1, Shantel Hebert-Magee4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although on-site cytopathology services have a significant impact on efficiency and accuracy of EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA), the availability of this service is variable.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of an intensive 2-day training program to educate endosonographers in EUS-related cytopathology.
DESIGN: Pilot study.
SETTING: Tertiary care medical center.
SUBJECTS: Six endosonographers (5 male, median age, 35 years) with minimal previous cytopathology exposure comprised the study cohort.
METHODS: Pre- and posttraining testing was administered. Training commenced with a cytopathology tutorial focusing on 4 performance measures: specimen adequacy, sample interpretation, specimen processing, and preliminary diagnosis. Eight live EUS-FNA cases were then performed, and study participants independently completed 4 questions based on performance measures for each case. The ability to independently smear and stain slides and operate a microscope was additionally assessed after a hands-on tutorial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Comparison of pretraining and posttraining scores, improvement in performance measures for live cases, and ability to independently handle specimens and operate a microscope.
RESULTS: Compared with pretraining, mean posttraining test scores improved by 63% from 48 to 78 out of 100. Mean live case performance score was 95%. Performances improved from 89% on day 1 to 100% on day 2. After training, all endosonographers could independently smear/stain slides and operate a microscope. LIMITATIONS: Long-term impact is unclear.
CONCLUSIONS: An intensive 2-day program was effective in training endosonographers in the basics of EUS-related cytopathology. Incorporating basic cytopathology in EUS fellowship curriculum will likely improve diagnostic performance of tissue acquisition procedures.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123685     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  4 in total

1.  Feasibility of Using an Enzymatically Activatable Fluorescence Probe for the Rapid Evaluation of Pancreatic Tissue Obtained Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kazumichi Kawakubo; Shunsuke Ohnishi; Yutaka Hatanaka; Kanako C Hatanaka; Hidetaka Hosono; Yoshimasa Kubota; Mako Kamiya; Masaki Kuwatani; Hiroshi Kawakami; Yasuteru Urano; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Improving the results of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in daily practice: keep it simple.

Authors:  Ji Young Bang; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-02-11

Review 3.  "Clinical" cytology for endoscopists: A practical guide.

Authors:  Michael Hocke; Theodoros Topalidis; Barbara Braden; Christoph F Dietrich
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.628

4.  Endosonographers performing on-site evaluation of solid pancreatic specimens for EUS-guided biopsy: A formal training method and learning curves.

Authors:  Shi-Yu Li; Li Gao; Ping-Ping Zhang; Xiao-Ju Su; Xiang-Yu Kong; Kai-Xuan Wang; Zhen-Dong Jin
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.