Literature DB >> 25123129

The biomechanics of biodegradable versus titanium interference screw fixation for anterior cruciate ligament augmentation and reconstruction.

Max Ettinger1, Diana Schumacher, Tilman Calliess, Antonios Dratzidis, Marco Ezechieli, Christof Hurschler, Christoph Becher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) is one of the options available for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To date, however, there are no published data regarding the biomechanical properties of LARS fixation for ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of various LARS interference-screw fixations.
METHODS: A total of 100 LARS ligaments were fixed in porcine femurs with five different interference screws (four biodegradable screws and one titanium interference screw) introduced from inside-out or extra-articularly outside-in. Each group consisted of ten specimens. The constructs were cyclically stretched and subsequently loaded until failure. We evaluated the maximum load before failure, elongation during cyclic loading, stiffness, and failure mode.
RESULTS: Elongation during cyclical loading for all devices tested was significantly larger between the first and 20th cycles than between the 20th and 500th cycles (p < 0.05). Maximum failure load was not significantly lower for the biodegradable screws than for the titanium screws (p > 0.05). All specimens failed because of ligament pull-out from the bony tunnel.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that biomechanical secure fixation of the LARS for ACL reconstruction can be achieved using either biodegradable or titanium interference screws. The stability of fixation is independent of the approach, type of investigation, and type of fixation (extra-articular outside-in or intra-articular inside-out).

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25123129     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2483-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  21 in total

1.  The influence of screw geometry on hamstring tendon interference fit fixation.

Authors:  A Weiler; R F Hoffmann; C J Siepe; S F Kolbeck; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Mechanical evaluation of a soft tissue interference screw in free tendon anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation.

Authors:  D G Nagarkatti; B P McKeon; B S Donahue; J P Fulkerson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  [Biomechanical analysis of press-fit fixation of anterior cruciate ligament transplants].

Authors:  M Jagodzinski; M Ettinger; C Haasper; S Hankemeier; D Breitmeier; C Hurschler; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Biomechanical properties of femoral posterior cruciate ligament fixations.

Authors:  M Ettinger; M Petri; K T Haag; S Brand; A Dratzidis; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Höher; H D Möller; F H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  C B Frank; D W Jackson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Autogenous doubled hamstring tendons connected in series with polyester tapes.

Authors:  K Yasuda; J Tsujino; Y Tanabe; K Kaneda
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Compaction versus extraction drilling for fixation of the hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Janne T Nurmi; Teppo L N Järvinen; Pekka Kannus; Harri Sievänen; Jani Toukosalo; Markku Järvinen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The mechanics of the knee joint in relation to normal walking.

Authors:  J B Morrison
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The fixation strength of tibial PCL press-fit reconstructions.

Authors:  M Ettinger; T Wehrhahn; M Petri; E Liodakis; G Olender; U-V Albrecht; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  3 in total

1.  Resorbable screw and sheath versus resorbable interference screw and staples for ACL reconstruction: a comparison of two tibial fixation methods.

Authors:  Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Stefano Soderi; Luigi Sirleo; Giovanni Munz; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Does thread shape affect the fixation strength of the bioabsorbable interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gerardo L Garcés; Oscar Martel; Alejandro Yánez; Alberto Cuadrado
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Significant Loss of ACL Graft Force With Tibial-Sided Soft Tissue Interference Screw Fixation Over 24 Hours: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Philipp Kruppa; Anne Flies; Dag Wulsten; Robert Collette; Georg N Duda; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Roland Becker; Sebastian Kopf
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.