Literature DB >> 25122432

The prognostic impact of KRAS, its codon and amino acid specific mutations, on survival in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Benjamin Izar1, Haiyu Zhou, Rebecca S Heist, Christopher G Azzoli, Alona Muzikansky, Emily E F Scribner, Lindsay A Bernardo, Dora Dias-Santagata, Anthony J Iafrate, Michael Lanuti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite complete surgical resection, patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are at risk for disease recurrence. The impact of common oncogenic driver mutations on prognosis in stage I NSCLC is limited. The pure prognostic value of KRAS mutational status was explored in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: Mutation status was tested in patients who had complete resection of stage I lung adenocarcinoma without any adjuvant therapy, using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction)-based assay. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients with KRAS-mutant (KRAS-MUT), KRAS-MUT subtypes, and KRAS wild-type (KRAS-WT) tumors.
RESULTS: A total of 312 patients were included in this analysis; 127 harbored KRAS mutations and 185 had KRAS-WT tumors. When compared with KRAS-WT, KRAS-MUT was associated with significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio 4.36, 95% confidence interval 2.09-9.07; p < 0.0001) and DFS (hazard ratio 3.62, 95% confidence interval 2.11-6.22; p < 0.0001). When stratifying KRAS-WT patients based on EGFR status, KRAS-MUT patients had worse OS (p = 0.0001) and DFS (p < 0.0001) than patients with EGFR-MUT and EGFR-WT/KRAS-WT (WT/WT). Patients with codon 12 mutations had superior DFS (p = 0.0314), but there were no differences in OS compared with mutations found in codons 13 and 61 (p = 0.1772). We observed better DFS associated with G12C/G12V mutations compared with other amino acid specific KRAS mutations (p = 0.0271) with a trend towards improved OS (p = 0.0636). Multivariate analysis identified KRAS mutation as independent predictor of worse OS (p = 0.001) and DFS (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: KRAS is an independent prognostic marker in resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Differential outcomes are associated with codon and amino acid specific KRAS mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25122432     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  35 in total

Review 1.  KRAS Alleles: The Devil Is in the Detail.

Authors:  Kevin M Haigis
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-09-12

2.  MicroRNAs: a new tool in the complex biology of KRAS mutated non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Stéphane Renaud; Joseph Seitlinger; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Targeting KRAS-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: One Mutation at a Time, With a Focus on KRAS G12C Mutations.

Authors:  Timothy F Burns; Hossein Borghaei; Suresh S Ramalingam; Tony S Mok; Solange Peters
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Comprehensive analysis of the clinicopathological features, targetable profile, and prognosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Daisuke Ueda; Masaoki Ito; Yasuhiro Tsutani; Ana Giménez-Capitán; Ruth Román-Lladó; Ana Pérez-Rosado; Cristina Aguado; Kei Kushitani; Yoshihiro Miyata; Koji Arihiro; Miguel Angel Molina-Vila; Rafael Rosell; Yukio Takeshima; Morihito Okada
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Concordant and Discordant EGFR Mutations in Patients With Multifocal Adenocarcinomas: Implications for EGFR-Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Jody C Chuang; Joseph B Shrager; Heather A Wakelee; Joel W Neal
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Heterogeneity and mutation in KRAS and associated oncogenes: evaluating the potential for the evolution of resistance to targeting of KRAS G12C.

Authors:  Vincent L Cannataro; Stephen G Gaffney; Carly Stender; Zi-Ming Zhao; Mark Philips; Andrew E Greenstein; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Factors associated with distant recurrence following R0 lobectomy for pN0 lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Whitney S Brandt; Ilies Bouabdallah; Kay See Tan; Bernard J Park; Prasad S Adusumilli; Daniela Molena; Manjit S Bains; James Huang; James M Isbell; Matthew J Bott; David R Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Cyclin D1 expression as a potential prognostic factor in advanced KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sutima Luangdilok; Passakorn Wanchaijiraboon; Poonchavist Chantranuwatana; Chinachote Teerapakpinyo; Shanop Shuangshoti; Virote Sriuranpong
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

9.  Identification of five driver gene mutations in patients with treatment-naïve lung adenocarcinoma in Taiwan.

Authors:  Kuo-Hsuan Hsu; Chao-Chi Ho; Te-Chun Hsia; Jeng-Sen Tseng; Kang-Yi Su; Ming-Fang Wu; Kuo-Liang Chiu; Tsung-Ying Yang; Kun-Chieh Chen; Hean Ooi; Tzu-Chin Wu; Hung-Jen Chen; Hsuan-Yu Chen; Chi-Sheng Chang; Chung-Ping Hsu; Jiun-Yi Hsia; Cheng-Yen Chuang; Chin-Hung Lin; Jeremy J W Chen; Kuan-Yu Chen; Wei-Yu Liao; Jin-Yuan Shih; Sung-Liang Yu; Chong-Jen Yu; Pan-Chyr Yang; Gee-Chen Chang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  KRAS G12D Mutation Subtype Is A Prognostic Factor for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Fabrice Muscari; Camille Buscail; Eric Assenat; Marc Barthet; Pascal Hammel; Janick Selves; Rosine Guimbaud; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.