François Modave1, Navkiran K Shokar, Eribeth Peñaranda, Norma Nguyen. 1. François Modave is with the Department of Computer Science, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS. Navkiran K. Shokar, Eribeth Peñaranda, and Norma Nguyen are with the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Texas Tech University HSC, El Paso.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We systematically identified and evaluated the quality and comprehensiveness of online information related to weight loss that users were likely to access. METHODS: We evaluated the content quality, accessibility of the information, and author credentials for Web sites in 2012 that were identified from weight loss specific queries that we generated. We scored the content with respect to available evidence-based guidelines for weight loss. RESULTS: One hundred three Web sites met our eligibility criteria (21 commercial, 52 news/media, 7 blogs, 14 medical, government, or university, and 9 unclassified sites). The mean content quality score was 3.75 (range=0-16; SD=2.48). Approximately 5% (4.85%) of the sites scored greater than 8 (of 12) on nutrition, physical activity, and behavior. Content quality score varied significantly by type of Web site; the medical, government, or university sites (mean=4.82, SD=2.27) and blogs (mean=6.33, SD=1.99) had the highest scores. Commercial (mean=2.37, SD=2.60) or news/media sites (mean=3.52, SD=2.31) had the lowest scores (analysis of variance P<.005). CONCLUSIONS: The weight loss information that people were likely to access online was often of substandard quality because most comprehensive and quality Web sites ranked too low in search results.
OBJECTIVES: We systematically identified and evaluated the quality and comprehensiveness of online information related to weight loss that users were likely to access. METHODS: We evaluated the content quality, accessibility of the information, and author credentials for Web sites in 2012 that were identified from weight loss specific queries that we generated. We scored the content with respect to available evidence-based guidelines for weight loss. RESULTS: One hundred three Web sites met our eligibility criteria (21 commercial, 52 news/media, 7 blogs, 14 medical, government, or university, and 9 unclassified sites). The mean content quality score was 3.75 (range=0-16; SD=2.48). Approximately 5% (4.85%) of the sites scored greater than 8 (of 12) on nutrition, physical activity, and behavior. Content quality score varied significantly by type of Web site; the medical, government, or university sites (mean=4.82, SD=2.27) and blogs (mean=6.33, SD=1.99) had the highest scores. Commercial (mean=2.37, SD=2.60) or news/media sites (mean=3.52, SD=2.31) had the lowest scores (analysis of variance P<.005). CONCLUSIONS: The weight loss information that people were likely to access online was often of substandard quality because most comprehensive and quality Web sites ranked too low in search results.
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Shari S Bassuk; Frank B Hu; Meir J Stampfer; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: J O Hill; J Hauptman; J W Anderson; K Fujioka; P M O'Neil; D K Smith; J H Zavoral; L J Aronne Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Melinda A Maggard; Lisa R Shugarman; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Harvey J Sugerman; Harvey J Sugarman; Edward H Livingston; Ninh T Nguyen; Zhaoping Li; Walter A Mojica; Lara Hilton; Shannon Rhodes; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Zhaoping Li; Margaret Maglione; Wenli Tu; Walter Mojica; David Arterburn; Lisa R Shugarman; Lara Hilton; Marika Suttorp; Vanessa Solomon; Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Irina Yermilov; Marcia L McGory; Paul W Shekelle; Clifford Y Ko; Melinda A Maggard Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-04-02 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Molly E Waring; Danielle E Jake-Schoffman; Marta M Holovatska; Claudia Mejia; Jamasia C Williams; Sherry L Pagoto Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Christina Mary Pollard; Claire Elizabeth Pulker; Xingqiong Meng; Deborah Anne Kerr; Jane Anne Scott Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Yi Guo; Jiang Bian; Trevor Leavitt; Heather K Vincent; Lindsey Vander Zalm; Tyler L Teurlings; Megan D Smith; François Modave Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Sarah S Richtering; Karice Hyun; Lis Neubeck; Genevieve Coorey; John Chalmers; Tim Usherwood; David Peiris; Clara K Chow; Julie Redfern Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2017-01-27