Namrata Upadhayay1, Sanjeev Guragain2. 1. PhD Student, Department of Physiology, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences , Buddha Chowk, Dharan-18, Nepal . 2. PhD Student, Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Medical Sciences , Nepal .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are gender differences in cognitive abilities. The major enigma is whether males or females perform better in various cognitive tasks. The reports were found to be contradictory. Studies have shown that oestrogen and testosterone accentuate cognitive functions. But the effects of progesterone on cognitive functions are still contradictory. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the cognitive functions between male and female students. METHODS: This study was conducted on healthy male (n=21) and female (n=21) volunteers who were aged between 19-37 years. Cognitive functions which were assessed in males (one time) and females (two times: during preovulatory and postovulatory phases of the menstrual cycle) were attentional: visual reaction time (VRT) and Go/No-Go VRT; perceptual: fast counting (FC), executive: Erisken Flanker Test (EFT) and Stroop Test (ST), and working memory. Data were compared by using Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Cognitive functions in female preovulatory phase were comparable to male cognitive functions. In addition, the female postovulatory phase cognitive functions were also similar to those of males in all the tasks, except those seen in VRT and ST. Male performed better than females in VRT (M: 331.66 ms, IQR: 286.99-375.33 vs. M: 367.8 ms, IQR: 340.66-435.66; p=0.05). However, in ST, females showed higher accuracies in reading colour interferences than males (M: 100%, IQR: 95.12-100 vs. M: 95.24%, IQR: 86.36-100; p=0.04). In addition, males showed trend of a poorer performance than females in Go/No-Go VRT, ST colour reading normal time and interference time and in working-memory time. CONCLUSION: Male cognitive functions were comparable to female preovulatory phase cognitive functions. However, females, during postovulatory phase of their cycle, may have advantages in executive tasks (Stroop test) and disadvantages in attentional tasks (VRT), as compared to males.
BACKGROUND: There are gender differences in cognitive abilities. The major enigma is whether males or females perform better in various cognitive tasks. The reports were found to be contradictory. Studies have shown that oestrogen and testosterone accentuate cognitive functions. But the effects of progesterone on cognitive functions are still contradictory. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the cognitive functions between male and female students. METHODS: This study was conducted on healthy male (n=21) and female (n=21) volunteers who were aged between 19-37 years. Cognitive functions which were assessed in males (one time) and females (two times: during preovulatory and postovulatory phases of the menstrual cycle) were attentional: visual reaction time (VRT) and Go/No-Go VRT; perceptual: fast counting (FC), executive: Erisken Flanker Test (EFT) and Stroop Test (ST), and working memory. Data were compared by using Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: Cognitive functions in female preovulatory phase were comparable to male cognitive functions. In addition, the female postovulatory phase cognitive functions were also similar to those of males in all the tasks, except those seen in VRT and ST. Male performed better than females in VRT (M: 331.66 ms, IQR: 286.99-375.33 vs. M: 367.8 ms, IQR: 340.66-435.66; p=0.05). However, in ST, females showed higher accuracies in reading colour interferences than males (M: 100%, IQR: 95.12-100 vs. M: 95.24%, IQR: 86.36-100; p=0.04). In addition, males showed trend of a poorer performance than females in Go/No-Go VRT, ST colour reading normal time and interference time and in working-memory time. CONCLUSION: Male cognitive functions were comparable to female preovulatory phase cognitive functions. However, females, during postovulatory phase of their cycle, may have advantages in executive tasks (Stroop test) and disadvantages in attentional tasks (VRT), as compared to males.
Authors: Pamela Taxel; Michael C Stevens; Margaret Trahiotis; Jill Zimmerman; Richard F Kaplan Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Eda Cinar; Benajmin David Weedon; Patrick Esser; Shawn Joshi; Yan-Ci Liu; Anne Delextrat; Andy Meaney; Johnny Collett; Daniella Nicole Springett; Helen Dawes Journal: J Mot Behav Date: 2020-11-17 Impact factor: 1.358
Authors: Daniel J Fehring; Alexandra Gaillard; Farshad A Mansouri; Shapour Jaberzadeh; Helena Parkington Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 5.027
Authors: Sean D Conrin; Liang Zhan; Zachery D Morrissey; Mengqi Xing; Angus Forbes; Pauline Maki; Mohammed R Milad; Olusola Ajilore; Scott A Langenecker; Alex D Leow Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Marta Ołpińska-Lischka; Karolina Kujawa; Josef Alexander Wirth; Katarzyna Z Antosiak-Cyrak; Janusz Maciaszek Journal: Nat Sci Sleep Date: 2020-02-12
Authors: Abbi R Hernandez; Leah M Truckenbrod; Keila T Campos; Sonora A Williams; Sara N Burke Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Görkem Anapa; Mandy Roheger; Ümran Sema Seven; Hannah Liebermann-Jordanidis; Oezguer A Onur; Josef Kessler; Elke Kalbe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390