Literature DB >> 25119191

Understanding reproducibility of human IVF traits to predict next IVF cycle outcome.

Bin Wu1, Juanzi Shi, Wanqiu Zhao, Suzhen Lu, Marta Silva, Timothy J Gelety.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluating the failed IVF cycle often provides useful prognostic information. Before undergoing another attempt, patients experiencing an unsuccessful IVF cycle frequently request information about the probability of future success. Here, we introduced the concept of reproducibility and formulae to predict the next IVF cycle outcome.
METHODS: The experimental design was based on the retrospective review of IVF cycle data from 2006 to 2013 in two different IVF centers and statistical analysis. The reproducibility coefficients (r) of IVF traits including number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturity, fertilization, embryo quality and pregnancy were estimated using the interclass correlation coefficient between the repeated IVF cycle measurements for the same patient by variance component analysis. The formulae were designed to predict next IVF cycle outcome.
RESULTS: The number of oocytes retrieved from patients and their fertilization rate had the highest reproducibility coefficients (r = 0.81 ~ 0.84), which indicated a very close correlation between the first retrieval cycle and subsequent IVF cycles. Oocyte maturity and number of top quality embryos had middle level reproducibility (r = 0.38 ~ 0.76) and pregnancy rate had a relative lower reproducibility (r = 0.23 ~ 0.27). Based on these parameters, the next outcome for these IVF traits might be accurately predicted by the designed formulae.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the concept of reproducibility to our human IVF program allows us to predict future IVF cycle outcomes. The traits of oocyte numbers retrieved, oocyte maturity, fertilization, and top quality embryos had higher or middle reproducibility, which provides a basis for accurate prediction of future IVF outcomes. Based on this prediction, physicians may counsel their patients or change patient's stimulation plans, and laboratory embryologists may improve their IVF techniques accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25119191      PMCID: PMC4171406          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0288-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  9 in total

1.  Predictors of ovarian follicle number.

Authors:  C Westhoff; P Murphy; D Heller
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Clinical evaluation of the MPS 9000 Macular Pigment Screener.

Authors:  Hannah Bartlett; Louise Stainer; Sandip Singh; Frank Eperjesi; Olivia Howells
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000.

Authors:  G David Adamson; Jacques de Mouzon; Paul Lancaster; Karl-G Nygren; Elizabeth Sullivan; Fernando Zegers-Hochschild
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Estimating the success of an in vitro fertilization programme using multiple imputation.

Authors:  N Soullier; J Bouyer; J L Pouly; J Guibert; E de La Rochebrochard
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Predicting fertility.

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Neil P Johnson
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.767

6.  Predictors of IVF outcome: markers and protocols.

Authors:  David M Robertson
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2006-05

7.  The graduated embryo score predicts the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies better than a single day 3 evaluation and achieves results associated with blastocyst transfer from day 3 embryo transfer.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Fisch; Geoffrey Sher; Mark Adamowicz; Levent Keskintepe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Follicle numbers are highly repeatable within individual animals but are inversely correlated with FSH concentrations and the proportion of good-quality embryos after ovarian stimulation in cattle.

Authors:  J J Ireland; F Ward; F Jimenez-Krassel; J L H Ireland; G W Smith; P Lonergan; A C O Evans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Prediction models in reproductive medicine: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Esther Leushuis; Jan Willem van der Steeg; Pieternel Steures; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Fulco van der Veen; Ben W J Mol; Peter G A Hompes
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 15.610

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Understanding reproducibility of human IVF traits to predict next IVF cycle outcome; common mistake.

Authors:  Siamak Sabour
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.