Jeanine L Van Nostrand1, Colleen A Brady2, Heiyoun Jung1, Daniel R Fuentes3, Margaret M Kozak2, Thomas M Johnson2, Chieh-Yu Lin4, Chien-Jung Lin5, Donald L Swiderski6, Hannes Vogel4, Jonathan A Bernstein7, Tania Attié-Bitach8, Ching-Pin Chang9, Joanna Wysocka10, Donna M Martin11, Laura D Attardi12. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 2. 1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA [2] Cardiovascular Research Center and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA (C.A.B.); Department of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32827, USA (M.M.K.); Department of Emergency Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA (T.M.J.). 3. Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 5. Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 6. Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. 7. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 8. 1] Département de Génétique, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, APHP, 75015 Paris, France [2] Unite INSERM U1163, Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, Institut Imagine, 75015 Paris, France. 9. Krannert Institute of Cardiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA. 10. 1] Department of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA [2] Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA. 11. 1] Department of Pediatrics, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA [2] Department of Human Genetics, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. 12. 1] Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA [2] Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Abstract
CHARGE syndrome is a multiple anomaly disorder in which patients present with a variety of phenotypes, including ocular coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retarded growth and development, genitourinary hypoplasia and ear abnormalities. Despite 70-90% of CHARGE syndrome cases resulting from mutations in the gene CHD7, which encodes an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeller, the pathways underlying the diverse phenotypes remain poorly understood. Surprisingly, our studies of a knock-in mutant mouse strain that expresses a stabilized and transcriptionally dead variant of the tumour-suppressor protein p53 (p53(25,26,53,54)), along with a wild-type allele of p53 (also known as Trp53), revealed late-gestational embryonic lethality associated with a host of phenotypes that are characteristic of CHARGE syndrome, including coloboma, inner and outer ear malformations, heart outflow tract defects and craniofacial defects. We found that the p53(25,26,53,54) mutant protein stabilized and hyperactivated wild-type p53, which then inappropriately induced its target genes and triggered cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis during development. Importantly, these phenotypes were only observed with a wild-type p53 allele, as p53(25,26,53,54)(/-) embryos were fully viable. Furthermore, we found that CHD7 can bind to the p53 promoter, thereby negatively regulating p53 expression, and that CHD7 loss in mouse neural crest cells or samples from patients with CHARGE syndrome results in p53 activation. Strikingly, we found that p53 heterozygosity partially rescued the phenotypes in Chd7-null mouse embryos, demonstrating that p53 contributes to the phenotypes that result from CHD7 loss. Thus, inappropriate p53 activation during development can promote CHARGE phenotypes, supporting the idea that p53 has a critical role in developmental syndromes and providing important insight into the mechanisms underlying CHARGE syndrome.
CHARGE syndrome is a multiple anomaly disorder in which patients present with a variety of phenotypes, including ocular coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retarded growth and development, genitourinary hypoplasia and ear abnormalities. Despite 70-90% of CHARGE syndrome cases resulting from mutations in the gene CHD7, which encodes an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeller, the pathways underlying the diverse phenotypes remain poorly understood. Surprisingly, our studies of a knock-in mutant mouse strain that expresses a stabilized and transcriptionally dead variant of the tumour-suppressor protein p53 (p53(25,26,53,54)), along with a wild-type allele of p53 (also known as Trp53), revealed late-gestational embryonic lethality associated with a host of phenotypes that are characteristic of CHARGE syndrome, including coloboma, inner and outer ear malformations, heart outflow tract defects and craniofacial defects. We found that the p53(25,26,53,54) mutant protein stabilized and hyperactivated wild-type p53, which then inappropriately induced its target genes and triggered cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis during development. Importantly, these phenotypes were only observed with a wild-type p53 allele, as p53(25,26,53,54)(/-) embryos were fully viable. Furthermore, we found that CHD7 can bind to the p53 promoter, thereby negatively regulating p53expression, and that CHD7 loss in mouse neural crest cells or samples from patients with CHARGE syndrome results in p53 activation. Strikingly, we found that p53 heterozygosity partially rescued the phenotypes in Chd7-null mouse embryos, demonstrating that p53 contributes to the phenotypes that result from CHD7 loss. Thus, inappropriate p53 activation during development can promote CHARGE phenotypes, supporting the idea that p53 has a critical role in developmental syndromes and providing important insight into the mechanisms underlying CHARGE syndrome.
CHARGE syndrome is a multiple anomaly disorder that presents with a variety of
phenotypes, including ocular coloboma, heart
defects, choanal atresia, retarded growth and
development, genitourinary hypoplasia, and ear
abnormalities[1]. Although 70-90% of CHARGE
syndrome cases result from mutations in CHD7, encoding an ATP-dependent
chromatin remodeler, the pathways underlying the diverse phenotypes remain poorly
understood[2]. Surprisingly, our studies of
a knock-in mutant mouse strain expressing a stabilized and transcriptionally-dead variant of
the p53tumor suppressor protein (p5325,26,53,54)[3], along with a wild-type p53 allele, have revealed
late-gestational embryonic lethality associated with a host of phenotypes characteristic of
CHARGE, including coloboma, inner and outer ear malformations, heart outflow tract defects,
and craniofacial defects. We find that the p5325,26,53,54 mutant protein can
stabilize and hyperactivate wild-type p53 to inappropriately induce its target genes and
trigger cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis during development. Importantly, these phenotypes are
only observed with a wild-type p53 allele, as
p53 embryos are fully viable. We find
further that Chd7 can bind to the p53 promoter, thereby negatively regulating
p53expression, and that Chd7 loss in neural crest cells (NCC) or CHARGEpatient samples results in p53 activation. Strikingly, we find that
p53-heterozygosity partially rescues the phenotypes in
Chd7-null embryos, demonstrating that p53 contributes to phenotypes resulting
from Chd7 loss. Thus, inappropriate p53 activation during development can promote CHARGE
phenotypes, supporting a critical role for p53 in developmental syndromes and providing key
new insight into the mechanisms underlying CHARGE syndrome.Unrestrained p53 activity induced by loss of the negative regulators Mdm2 or Mdm4
causes early embryonic lethality[4]. To explore
the role of p53 transcriptional activation in promoting developmental failure, we examined
embryonic development in knock-in mice carrying mutations in the first or both of p53’s
two transcriptional activation domains (p5325,26 and p5325,26,53,54;
Fig. 1a, Extended-Data
Fig. 1). These mutations both disrupt the p53-Mdm2 interaction –
recapitulating loss of Mdm2 regulation – and compromise transactivation[3]. Expression of p5325,26, which is
severely impaired for transactivating most p53 target genes, caused early embryonic lethality
(E10.5; Extended-Data Fig. 2a-c)[5]. Surprisingly,
p53 embryos also exhibited embryonic lethality, but
between E13.5-15.5 (Extended-Data Table 1-2). Lethality associated with p5325,26,53,54
depended on a wild-type p53 allele, as
p53 adult mice were viable (Extended-Data Fig. 2b, 2d). This contrasts with
p53mice, which displayed embryonic lethality,
likely due to the residual transactivation potential of p5325,26 on genes like
Bax[3] (Extended-Data Fig. 2a-b). Our findings both underscore the importance of
transactivation for embryonic lethality induced by stabilized p53, as
p53mice are viable, and reveal an
intriguing genetic interaction between transactivation-dead p5325,26,53,54 and
wild-type p53 during development.
Figure 1
p53 Embryos Exhibit Lethality and Diverse
Craniofacial Defects Characteristic of CHARGE Syndrome
(a) p53 TAD mutant allele with L25Q, W26S, F53Q, F54S mutations. Cre deletes
Lox-Stop-Lox (LSL) cassette, inducing
p53 expression. (b) Exencephaly
(63%, n=35; arrow) and short lower jaw (74%, n=27; arrowhead) in E15.5
p53 embryo. (c) Cleft palate
(arrow) in E15.5 p53 embryo. (n=3).
(d) Absent external ear pinna (arrow) of E15.5
p53 embryo. (47%, n=17). (e)
Posterior semicircular canal (pc) fused to common crus (CC; arrow) in E13.5
p53 inner ear. ac-anterior canal, lc-lateral
canal. (71%, n=12). (f) Coloboma (arrow) in E13.5
p53 embryo. (59%, n=17). (g)
Retinal coloboma (Re; arrow) in E15.5 p53
embryo.
Extended Data Figure 1
Model for Examining p53-Associated Developmental Phenotypes
(a) Schematic of p5325,26, p5353,54,
and p5325,26,53,54 mutant p53 proteins. TAD: Transactivation Domain 1 or
2, PRD: Proline-Rich Domain, Tet: Tetramerization Domain, Basic: Basic Residue-Rich
Domain. (b)
p53 mice (where mut can denote any of the p53
TAD mutants) were crossed to p53 mice, which
express Cre in the germline, to assess viability and developmental phenotypes of the
p53 mutant-expressing progeny. (c) Table summarizing
the actual genotypes and ultimate functional genotypes of progeny from crosses of
p53 and
p53 mice, as used throughout the
manuscript. While
p53;CMV-Cre is the
actual initial genotype, when Cre acts to delete the Lox-Stop-Lox
cassette, the genotype will be written as
p53 to reflect this recombination. In the
text and figure labels, the Cre nomenclature for both control and
p53 embryos is excluded for simplicity.
Controls for analyses comprise embryos both with and without the
CMV-Cre transgene, as summarized in Extended-Data Fig. 3.
Extended Data Figure 2
p53 Mice, but not
p53 or
p53 Mice, are Viable
(a) Crosses of p53
with p53 or
p53 mice reveal a decrease in viable
pups expressing p5325,26 at E9.5-E10.5. Observed numbers of live and dead
pups compared to the expected numbers of live pups are indicated. [Observed
(Expected)] The genotypes of p53 and
p53 mice carrying a
CMV-Cre transgene lack the LSL designation because the
Lox-Stop-Lox element has been deleted from the genome.
Significance as assessed by Binomial distribution statistical tests on live pups:
p=0.18 and 0.09 (b) Crosses of p53 with
p53 mice reveal that
p53 mice, but not
p53 mice, are viable as assessed at
postnatal day 21 (P21). Mut denotes either mutant allele. Observed numbers of pups
compared to the expected numbers of pups are indicated. [Observed (Expected)] The
genotypes of p53 and
p53 mice carrying a
CMV-Cre transgene lack the LSL designation because the
Lox-Stop-Lox element has been deleted from the genome. Lack of
pups is significant at P21 as assessed by Binomial distribution statistical tests on
live pups: p53 and
p53: *p<=3.42E-05,
p53: **p=4.77E-07 (c)
Whole-mount images of a p53 embryo (right) at
E9.5 displaying developmental delay (top) and neural tube defects, including
exencephaly and kinked spine (bottom), compared to littermate control (left).
(d)
p53 mice display a shortened
lifespan (median lifespan 128 days, n=8) compared to wild-type mice (median lifespan
774 days) and a similar lifespan to p53
mice (median lifespan 143 days), further indicating that the
p53 allele itself behaves like a
p53 null allele. p<0.0001 by Mantel-Cox statistical
analysis comparing wild-type and p53 25,26,53,54/− mice
Extended Data Table 1
p53+/+;CMV-Cre X
p53LSL-X/+
Genotype:
p53LSL-wt
p53LSL-53,54
p53LSL-25,26,53,54
# Observed Progeny (# Expected
Progeny) at P21
p53+/+
18 (15)
10 (12)
19 (41.75)
p53+/+Cre+
21 (15)
14 (12)
68 (41.75)
p53LSL-X/+
11 (15)
9 (12)
50 (41.75)
p53X/+Cre+
10 (15)
15 (12)
0* (41.75)
n=60p=0.086
n=48p=0.876
n=167*p=7.65E-18
Extended Data Table 2
p53++;CMV-Cre X
p53LSL-25,26,53,54/+
Genotype:
Embryonic Age:
E12.5
E15.5
E13.5
E14.5
E18.5
# Observed Progeny (# Expected
Progeny)
p53+/+
Live
32 (28)
37 (45)
21 (20)
15 (19)
12 (14)
Dead
1
3
2
0
0
Exencephaly
0
0
0
0
0
p53+/+Cre+
Live
27 (28)
59 (45)
20 (20)
17 (19)
20 (14)
Dead
4
12
3
1
5
Exencephaly
0
0
0
1
0
P53LSL-25,26,53,54/+
Live
26 (28)
38 (45)
18 (20)
24 (19)
9 (14)
Dead
3
3
1
0
0
Exencephaly
0
0
0
0
0
p5325,26,53,54/+ Care+
Live
16 (19)
23* (37)
7 (14)
1** (16)
2* (7)
Dead
3
8
11
6
9
Exencephaly
14
8
2
1
1
p53LSL-25,26,53,54/+
Cre+No or incomplete recombination
Live
9
8
6
3
7
Dead
1
1
1
0
1
Exencephaly
0
2
0
0
0
n=122
n=192
n=90
n=67
n=65
p=0.290
*p=0.019
p=0.053
**p=1.24E-05
*p=0.047
Analysis of p53 embryos identified a host of
gender-independent developmental phenotypes absent in littermate controls (Fig. 1-2, Extended-Data Fig. 3-4).
E13.5 and older p53 embryos commonly displayed
exencephaly, as well as craniofacial defects, including square-shaped faces, short lower jaws,
cleft lip, and cleft palate (Fig. 1b-c, Extended-Data Fig. 4a-b). Furthermore,
p53 embryos displayed defects in external ear
formation (Fig. 1d) and a spectrum of inner ear defects,
ranging from mild, with the posterior semi-circular canal either truncated or fused to the
common crus (Fig. 1e), to highly abnormal, with extreme
inner ear bone malformation. We also observed retinal coloboma in
p53 embryos (Fig.
1f-g). As a potential contributor to the craniofacial defects, we examined
osteogenesis[6] and found delayed bone
formation in p53 embryos, suggesting growth
retardation (Extended-Data Fig. 4c). Notably, this
constellation of phenotypes is reminiscent of those in humanCHARGE syndrome. In particular,
the combined presentation of coloboma and inner ear defects is characteristic of CHARGE and
rarely occurs in other conditions[7].
Figure 2
p53 Embryos Exhibit Additional Features of
CHARGE Syndrome and p53-Dependent Cellular Responses
(a) Double outlet right ventricle (DORV) in E13.5
p53 heart (50%, n=6). Top: Main pulmonary
artery (MPA) connects via pulmonary valve (PV) to right ventricle (RV) in both control and
p53 embryo. Bottom: Aorta (Ao) in control
embryo connects to left ventricle (LV) via aortic valve (AV)Φ. Aorta in
p53 embryo connects to RV via AV*.
(b) Abnormal atrioventricular cushions in E13.5
p53 heart (75%, n=4) fail to elongateinto
mature mitral (mv, arrowhead) and tricuspid (tv, arrow) valves. RA: right atrium; LA: left
atrium. (c) E13.5 p53 kidneys are
smaller (79%), with fewer average glomeruli (13 vs. 3; n=5; arrows), than controls.
(d)
p53 embryonic phenotypes observed in CHARGE
(+present, −absent). (e) Left: Cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3; Top) and p53
(Bottom) immunohistochemistry in E15.5 retinas. Arrows: CC3-positive cells. Right:
CC3-positive cells per retinal area. ***p-value=0.007; one-tailed Welsh’s t-test
(n=5). (f) BrdU immunofluorescence in E9.5 Pax3+ NCCs (delineated
by green-dotted line; Extended-Data Fig. 6c). Right:
Percentage BrdU-positive cells per total Pax3+ NCCs ***p-value=0.004 one-tailed
Student’s t-test (n=4).
Extended Data Figure 3
Genotypes of Control Embryos in Figures and the Genders Associated with
Phenotypes
(a) Table identifying the genotypes of control embryos shown
for each analysis. (b) The table shows the number of male and female
p53 embryos observed with the indicated
phenotypes, as assessed by Zfy PCR. Phenotypes are well represented
in both sexes.
Extended Data Figure 4
p53 Embryos Exhibit Additional
Features of CHARGE Syndrome
(a) H&E-stained sections of E12.5 control (left) and
p53 embryos (right). Examination
confirmed neural tube closure defects (arrow). (b) Close-up image of
UV-illuminated, ethidium bromide-stained E15.5
p53 embryo (right) to highlight short
lower jaw phenotype with protruding tongue (arrow) compared to control littermate
(left). 74% (n=27) of p53 embryos exhibited
short lower jaw. Cleft lip not shown. (c) Top: Alizarin Red (bone) and
Alcian Blue (cartilage) whole-mount stained E15.0
p53 embryo (right) showing reduced bone
density in the cranium (c) and nasal cavity (n); shorter ulna (u), humerus (h),
mandible (m), and femur (f); and reduced bone formation in the ribs (R), where fewer
vertebrae are undergoing ossification relative to control littermate (left). Number
of vertebrae with bone formation: 19 in control (arrow; V19) versus 18 in
p53 embryo (arrow; V18). The severity
of bone and cartilage defects is variable, with the most severe defects evident in
embryos with exencephaly and severe craniofacial defects. n=7. Bottom:
Quantification of bone lengths shown as percent of E14.5-15.0 littermate controls.
Bone lengths of the mandible, humerus, ulna, and femur were measured using the ruler
function in Adobe Photoshop on images taken at 6.3×. Only litters with
detectable bone formation in p53 embryos
were included in bone length analyses. Student’s T-test **p=0.008 (mandible),
**p=0.005 (humerus). (d) Representative images of H&E-stained
sagittal sections of E12.5 control (left) and
p53 hearts (right) showing all three
cardiac cell types in both genotypes. en: endocardium; ep: epicardium; myo:
myocardium (arrows). (e) H&E-stained E12.5
p53 heart exhibiting persistent truncus
arteriosus (PTA) (33%, n=6). The cardiac outflow tract in the control embryo (left)
is septated into the aorta (Ao) and main pulmonary artery (MPA), whereas the cardiac
outflow tract (truncus arteriosus or TA) in the
p53 embryo (right) remains unseptated,
resulting in PTA. (f) Illustration of control heart (left) and
p53 embryo heart (right), highlighting
DORV and atrioventricular cushion defects. Both the aorta (Ao) and main pulmonary
artery (MPA) flow out from the right ventricle (RV), resulting in mixed oxygenated
and deoxygenated blood in systemic circulation when combined with concurrent VSDs
(ventricular septal defects). The atrioventricular cushions remain bulbous and fail
to elongate into mature valve leaflets (mitral valve: mv; tricuspid valve: tv). Red:
oxygenated blood; Blue: deoxygenated blood; Purple/Pink: mixed
oxygenated/deoxygenated blood. (g) Representative H&E-stained
transverse section of thymus in p53 E15.5
embryo (right) reveals smaller thymus compared to control littermate (left) (63% of
control; n=4). (h) Representative H&E analysis of liver sections
from E12.5 control (left) and p53 embryos
(right) showing normal liver architecture in both genotypes (top). High
magnification image (bottom) of the region of the liver outlined by the white box in
the top panel shows the presence of nucleated erythrocytes (arrows), indicating
proper hematopoiesis. (i) Top: Table summarizing the incidence (%) and
sample size (n) for phenotypes assessed qualitatively in
p53 embryos. The occurrence of these
phenotypes in CHARGE syndrome is also indicated (+ present, − absent).
Bottom: Table summarizing phenotypes assessed quantitatively in
p53 embryos relative to controls, shown
as the percent average size of controls (%), with sample size (n) also indicated.
The occurrence of these phenotypes in CHARGE syndrome is also shown (+ present).
Detailed description of bone and cartilage defects can be found in Extended-Data Fig. 4c.
Given this phenotypic overlap with CHARGE, we examined whether
p53 embryos display other CHARGE-related
characteristics[8-10]. Hearts in p53 embryos
possessed the full complement of cell types (Extended-Data Fig.
4d), but displayed outflow tract defects (Persistent Truncus Arteriosus and Double
Outlet Right Ventricle; Fig. 2a, Extended-Data Fig. 4e-f) accompanied by ventricular septation defects (not
shown). The atrioventricular cushions also failed to remodel, foreshadowing potential heart
valve defects (Fig. 2b, Extended-Data Fig. 4f). Notably, outflow tract and atrioventricular septation
defects are highly overrepresented in CHARGEpatients compared to individuals with isolated
congenital heart disease[11]. Additionally,
kidneys and thymi in p53 embryos were smaller than in
controls, and kidneys displayed branching defects (Fig.
2c, Extended-Data Fig. 4g). These phenotypes
contrasted with the liver, which exhibited normal architecture and hematopoiesis (Extended-Data Fig. 4h). Evaluation for choanal atresia and
external genital defects – features of CHARGE – was precluded by
late-gestational embryonic lethality. Importantly, p53-null embryos did not
display CHARGE-like phenotypes, suggesting that these phenotypes result from p53 activation
(Extended-Data Fig. 5)[12-14]. Collectively,
analysis of p53 embryonic phenotypes revealed a
strong similarity to CHARGEpatient phenotypes (Fig. 2d,
Extended-Data Fig. 4i), including the hallmarks of
coloboma, ear malformations, and heart defects. Additionally, we observed exencephaly and
late-gestation lethality, neither of which is commonly reported in CHARGE. However, it remains
possible that CHARGE fetuses with more severe phenotypes die in utero[.
Extended Data Figure 5
p53 Embryos Do Not Exhibit
Characteristics of CHARGE Syndrome
(a) Whole-mount image of the external ear of E15.5
p53 embryo (right) and control
embryo (left) showing normal ear pinna development. (b) Whole mount
image of E13.5 p53 embryo (right) and
control embryo (left) showing normal retinal development and no evidence of
coloboma. (c) Whole-mount image of E15.5
p53 embryo (right) and control
embryo (left) with normal lower jaw development. (d) Alizarin Red
(bone) and Alcian Blue (cartilage) whole-mount stained E14.5
p53 embryo (right) showing normal
long bone formation of the ulna (u), humerus (h), mandible (m), and femur (f)
relative to control littermate (left). Bottom: Quantification of bone lengths shown
as percent of E14.5 littermate controls (n=3). (e) Representative
images of H&E-stained sagittal sections of E13.5 control (left) and
p53 hearts (right) showing all
three cardiac cell types in both genotypes. en: endocardium; ep: epicardium; myo:
myocardium (arrows). (f) Analysis of H&E-stained transverse
sections of E13.5 p53 and control
hearts revealing normal outflow tract development. (Top) The main pulmonary artery
(MPA) and aorta (Ao) are fully septated, and the MPA connects to the right ventricle
(RV) in p53 hearts. (Bottom) The aorta
connects to the left ventricle (LV). Φventricular outflow tract
that connects the left ventricle and aorta. PV: pulmonary valve, AV: aortic valve
(g) Analysis of transverse sections of H&E-stained E13.5
p53 hearts (right) reveals normal
atrioventricular cushions which have remodeled to form mature, elongated mitral (mv,
arrowhead) and tricuspid (tv, arrow) valves similar to control hearts (left). RA:
right atrium; LA: left atrium; RV: right ventricle; LV: left ventricle.
(h) H&E-stained sagittal section of kidney from
p53 (right) and control embryos
(left) showing normal renal size and development. (i) H&E-stained
transverse section of thymi in p53
E13.5 embryo (right) reveals similar thymus size compared to control littermate
(left).
To understand the underlying cellular basis for the
p53 embryonic phenotypes, we examined whether p53
apoptotic or cell-cycle arrest responses were induced. Analysis of the retina, which is
affected in coloboma, and NCCs, which are responsible for some CHARGE phenotypes, revealed
increased apoptosis and decreased proliferation in
p53 embryos compared to controls (Fig. 2e-f, Extended-Data Fig.
6a, c-d). Similar results were observed in other tissues affected in CHARGE,
including the thymus, neuroepithelium, and otic vesicles (Extended-Data Fig. 6b, 6e-f). Thus, both increased apoptosis and reduced
proliferation contribute to p53 embryonic
phenotypes.
Extended Data Figure 6
p53 Embryo Tissues Display Increased
Apoptosis and Decreased Proliferation
(a) Left: Immunofluorescence for Phospho-Histone H3 (red) in
the retina of E13.5 control and p53
embryos. Right: Quantification of Phospho-Histone H3 positive cells per retina area
relative to littermate controls. **p-value=0.006 by one-tailed Welsh’s t-test
(n=4). (b) Left: Immunohistochemistry for cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3) in
thymi of control (left) and p53 (right)
embryos. Inset: close-up image of cleaved-caspase 3 positive region. Right:
Quantification of CC3-positive cells per thymic area. *p-value=0.02 by one-tailed
Student’s t-test (n=4). (c) Immunofluorescence for Pax3 (green)
in neural crest cells of E9.5 control and
p53 embryos was used to identify neural
crest cells in Figure 2f. (d)
Left: Immunofluorescence for cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3, red) and Pax3 (green) in neural
crest cells of E9.5 control and p53
embryos. p53 embryos have more apoptotic
(red) neural crest cells, as determined by Pax3-positive staining (green), compared
to control littermates. Right: Quantification of CC3 positive cells per total neural
crest cell number. p-value=0.14 by one-tailed Student’s t-test (n=4).
(e) Left: Immunofluorescence for cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3, red) in otic
vesicle of E9.5 control and p53 embryos.
Right: Quantification of CC3 positive cells per total cell number. *p-value=0.03 by
one-tailed Student’s t-test (n=3). (f) Whole-mount
cleaved-caspase 3 staining in E8.5 control and
p53 embryos reveals enhanced apoptosis in
the neuroepithelium of p53 embryos (right)
but not in controls (left). Close-up shows magnification of the caudal
neuroepithelium (bottom). Arrows indicate cleaved-caspase 3 positive regions.
We next investigated the molecular mechanisms through which p5325,26,53,54
triggers CHARGE-associated phenotypes. Mutation of p53 residues 25,26 inhibits Mdm2
interaction, resulting in inappropriate p5325,26,53,54 protein stabilization, as
seen in untreated p53 and
p53mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs)
compared to untreated p53 MEFs (Fig 3a, Extended-Data Fig. 7a). Using
co-transfection/immunoprecipitation, we showed that p5325,26,53,54 interacts with
wild-type p53 (Fig. 3b, Extended-Data Fig 7b). Moreover, overexpressing increasing amounts of
FLAG-p5325,26,53,54 (lanes 2-4), but not FLAG-p53 (lanes 6-8), caused HA-p53
protein accumulation (Fig. 3c). Similarly, immunoblot
analysis with a wild-type p53-specific antibody revealed increased wild-type p53 protein in
untreated p53 MEFs (lane 5) relative to untreated
p53 or p53 MEFs
(lanes 2-3; Fig. 3a). To examine the effects of increased
wild-type p53, we examined p53 target gene expression in
p53 and control MEFs. p5325,26,53,54
alone displayed no transcriptional activity, as seen in genome-wide microarray analyses (Extended-Data Fig. 7c)[3] and individual gene qRT-PCR assays comparing
p53 and
p53 MEFs (Fig.
3d). In contrast, p5325,26,53,54 combined with wild-type p53 drove
elevated expression of select p53 target genes, including Noxa and
Pidd, but not p21 and Mdm2, relative to
levels in p53 and p53
MEFs, suggesting that p5325,26,53,54 activates wild-type p53 to induce expression
of specific p53 target genes (Fig. 3d, Extended-Data Fig. 7d). Similarly, overexpression of
p5325,26,53,54, but not wild-type p53, in p53 MEFs
significantly enhanced expression of select p53 target genes (Extended-Data Fig. 7e). Quantitative-ChIP analyses revealed that this selective
target gene activation resulted from increased p53 binding to response elements of particular
target genes in p53 MEFs compared to
p53 MEFs (Fig.
3e). This pattern likely reflects different affinities of p53 binding sites for p53,
such that p53 can only bind and activate transcription from lower affinity p53 binding sites,
such as those in Noxa and Pidd, when sufficiently
stabilized, as in the presence of both p5325,26,53,54 and wild-type
p5317. Collectively, these findings suggest that in
p53 embryos, p5325,26,53,54 interacts
with and stabilizes wild-type p53, likely by compromising Mdm2 interaction, and activates p53
to inappropriately induce target gene expression, cell-cycle arrest/apoptosis, and CHARGE-like
phenotypes (Fig. 3f).
Figure 3
p5325,26,53,54 Interacts with and Increases Wild-Type p53 Levels and
Activity
(a) Immunoblot for total p53 (top row) and wild-type (WT) p53
(2nd row) in untreated and doxorubicin (Dox)-treated MEFs. Actin loading
control. (b) Anti-FLAG immunoprecipitation from
p53 MEFs transiently overexpressing
HA-p53 and FLAG-p53 or FLAG-p5325,26,53,54. Negative controls: HA-MBP,
FLAG-eGFP. *See Extended-Data Figure 7b
(c) Immunoblot of p53 MEFs
transiently overexpressing HA-p53 and increasing amounts of FLAG-p53 or
FLAG-p5325,26,53,54. Bottom: Average+/−s.d. HA-p53 protein levels
relative to lane 1 and normalized to Actin. (n=3). (d) p53 target gene
expression in untreated MEFs. Averages+/−s.d. normalized to
β-actin. (n=4) *,***p-values<0.05,<0.005 comparing
p53 and
p53 MEFs by two-tailed Student’s t-test.
(e) Representative of duplicate p53 ChIP analyses of p53 target genes in
MEFs, relative to input DNA. (f) Proposed model for how
p5325,26,53,54 affects p53 activity.
Extended Data Figure 7
p5325,26,53,54 is Transactivation-Dead but Augments Wild-Type p53
Activity
(a) Western blot analysis of p53 protein levels in untreated
or doxorubicin-treated (0.2 μg/ml Dox)
p53, and
p53 MEFs. Actin serves as a loading
control. (b) Western blot analysis of anti-FLAG immunoprecipitation
from p53 MEFs transiently
overexpressing HA-p53 and FLAG-p53 or FLAG-p5325,26,53,54. HA-MBP and
FLAG-eGFP were used as negative controls. Immunoprecipitated protein and 10% input
were probed with either anti-HA or anti-FLAG. (μg ratio of HA-p53 to FLAG-p53
or FLAG-p5325,26,53,54 plasmid DNA: 1:1 or 1:2.5). (Supplement to Fig. 3b) (c) Heat map examining the
transactivation capacity of p5325,26,53,54 on p53-dependent genes
identified by microarray analysis through comparison of six
HrasV12;p53 wild-type mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) lines to six
HrasV12;p53null MEF lines, as previously
described[3]. Three independent
HrasV12;p53 MEFs lines were
analyzed, and showed that the gene expression profiles were indistinguishable from
HrasV12;p53 null cells. Numbered columns indicate independent MEF
lines. Blue – repressed genes; Red – induced genes. (d)
qRT-PCR analysis of p53 target gene expression in untreated MEFs derived from
p53 and
p53 E13.5 embryos. Graphs indicate
averages from four independent MEF lines, +/−SD, after normalization to
β-actin. **,*** denote p-values of <0.01, and
<0.005, respectively, by Student’s t-test analysis. (e)
qRT-PCR analysis of p53 target gene expression in p53
and p53 MEFs stably transduced with
empty vector, FLAG-p53, or FLAG-p5325,26,53,54. Representative gene
expression from one experiment. +/−SD of technical triplicates after
normalization to β-actin.
These observations suggested that p53 may respond to Chd7 status and play a role in
CHARGE syndrome. Analysis of Chd7expression in
p53 and p53
MEFs revealed no significant difference, suggesting that altered Chd7 levels
do not explain the CHARGE-like phenotypes in p53
embryos (Extended-Data Fig. 8a). We next assessed
whether p53 responds to changes in Chd7 status[15,16,18,19]. Indeed, p53
and select p53 target genes were induced in Chd7-null NCCs (Fig.
4a, Extended-Data Fig 8b). Interestingly, ChIP
analyses showed that Chd7 binds the p53 promoter in NCCs, suggesting that
Chd7 negatively regulates p53expression, providing a mechanism by which Chd7
loss might contribute to a p53 response (Fig. 4b),
although not excluding the possibility that Chd7 deficiency could also activate p53 through
other mechanisms. To query p53 activation in CHARGE syndrome directly, we analyzed
CHD7-mutation-positive CHARGEpatient fibroblasts and found increased basal
p53 protein levels as well as target gene induction following mild stress, relative to
controls (Fig. 4c-d). Similarly, analysis of thymi showed
more p53-positive thymocytes in CHD7-mutation-positive CHARGE fetuses than in
unaffected fetuses (Fig. 4e). Thus, p53 is activated in
Chd7- null NCCs and in humanCHARGEpatient fibroblasts and tissue. To
establish the role of p53 downstream of Chd7 loss, we tested whether
Chd7-null phenotypes are rescued by p53-heterozygosity. We
found that the characteristic Chd7-null phenotypes of severe developmental
delay and generalized hypoplasia at E10.5 are significantly rescued on a
p53 background. Specifically, heart development and
somite number – an indicator of developmental stage – are rescued, while limb,
forebrain, and facial morphogenesis are partially rescued (Fig.
4f-g, Extended-Data Fig. 8c-d). Thus,
p53-heterozygosity rescues phenotypes caused by Chd7 inactivation, although
incompletely, consistent with the existence of both p53-dependent and p53-independent
responses downstream of Chd7 loss. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Chd7
deficiency provokes p53 activation and p53-dependent phenotypes.
(a) qRT-PCR analysis of Chd7 in untreated
MEFs derived from E13.5 p53 and
p53 embryos. Graphs indicate averages
from four independent MEF lines, +/−s.d., after normalization to
β-actin. ns=non-significant. (b) Left:
Schematic of neural crest cell differentiation. Right: Representative qRT-PCR
analysis of neural crest cell markers in neural crest-like cells differentiated from
Chd7 and
Chd7 (whi/whi) mouse
embryonic stem cells normalized to β-actin and compared to
matched embryonic stem cells. (c) H&E-stained E10.5
Chd7 (control),
Chd7 and
Chd7
embryos. The Chd7
embryo shown is necrotic as evidenced by cellular autolysis. (d)
Close-up image of heart region, denoted by red box in panel c, in E10.5
Chd7 (control) and
Chd7
embryos.
Figure 4
p53 is Activated Upon Chd7 Deficiency and Contributes to Chd7-null
Phenotypes
(a) p53 target gene expression in Chd7 and
Chd7 (whi/whi) NCCs.
Averages+/−s.e.m. normalized to β-actin (n=5).
*,**p-values<0.05,<0.01, one-tailed Mann-Whitney test. (b) Top:
5′ end of p53 locus. Bottom: Representative of triplicate ChIP
analyses of Chd7 binding at p53 promoter (P1) and negative control open-chromatin regions
(P2 and P3), relative to input. +/−s.d. of technical triplicates. (c)
Bottom: p53 immunoblot of human fibroblasts derived from unaffected and CHARGE patients.
(Below: p53 levels after normalization to Actin.) Top: Averages+/−s.d of p53
levels. *p-value=0.015, one-tailed Student’s t-test. (d) p53 target
gene expression in low-serum treated human fibroblast cells derived from unaffected and
CHARGE patients relative to untreated samples. 5 CHARGE cell lines analyzed in duplicate.
Representative cell line pair is shown, +/−s.d. of technical triplicates.
(e) Left, p53 immunohistochemistry on thymi from fetuses with CHARGE
syndrome and unaffected fetuses. Arrows: p53-positive cells. Right, The number of
p53-positive cells per ten fields at 400× magnification, from one section.
(f) Comparison to control and
Chd7 embryos reveals
partial rescue of E10.5
Chd7 embryos.
(Chd7: n=3;
Chd7: n=6).
(g) Embryo somite number for each genotype. ns=non-significant,
**,***p-value=0.0024,0.00032, two-tailed Student’s t-test.
Our p53mouse strain provides a new model to
study features relevant to CHARGE syndrome. Mouse models for CHARGE syndrome have been
generated previously through ENU mutagenesis or targeting of the Chd7
locus[20,21]. While Chd7 mutants display
embryonic lethality ~E10.5, Chd7 mutants are
viable, exhibiting defects of the inner ear, heart, external genitalia, and
choanae/palate[20,21]. In the inner ear, Chd7mice display truncated lateral semicircular canals (SCCs) and variably truncated posterior
SCCs[20,22], whereas p53 embryos primarily
exhibit posterior SCC defects or defects in all three SCCs, similar to CHARGEpatients, in
which all three SCCs are often involved[23].
Interestingly, Chd7mice are not reported to display the
CHARGE hallmarks of coloboma or cardiac outflow tract defects. Thus, the presence of extensive
ear defects, heart defects, and coloboma in p53
embryos highlights the utility of our model for recapitulating a broader form of CHARGE,
potentially representing a phenotype intermediate in severity between
Chd7 and
Chd7 mutants.Interestingly, the collection of phenotypes in
p53 embryos represents one in a spectrum of mouse
models whereby varying levels of p53 activity trigger different phenotypes. Unlike
Mdm2-deficiency, which results in stabilized, fully active wild-type p53,
the combination of wild-type p53 and p5325,26,53,54 in
p53 embryos results in modest p53 activation,
causing lethality and phenotypes less severe than Mdm2 loss[24]. The
p53 embryonic phenotypes also contrast with those
seen in other hyperactive-p53mouse models, including one where expression of a
carboxy-terminal p53 fragment causes premature aging, and another where reduced Mdm2expression triggers lymphopenia and reduced body weight in adults[25-27]. In these models,
phenotypes manifested without enhanced basal p53 activity or increased p53 stabilization,
respectively, potentially explaining the lack of embryonic lethality and the milder phenotypes
than in p53 embryos.Mechanistically, our observation that p53 activation is sufficient to cause
CHARGE-like phenotypes in mice suggested that activated p53 could similarly provoke the
characteristic defects in humanCHARGE. Indeed, p53expression and activity are increased with
Chd7 deficiency, and phenotypes triggered by Chd7 loss are partially rescued by
p53-heterozygosity. This contrasts with a study where p53 morpholinos
failed to rescue Chd7 deficiency in zebrafish, perhaps reflecting species-specific
differences[28]. p53 may also function
independently of CHD7 to induce CHARGE features, a possibility relevant in the ~10-30%
of cases where CHD7 is not mutated. p53 could become activated in response to
other genetic alterations found in CHARGE or the p53 pathway could itself be mutated in some
CHARGE cases. Our sequencing analysis of the p53 coding region in 25
CHD7-mutation-negative CHARGEpatients failed to reveal any mutations, potentially because
modest p53 activation may be difficult to achieve by point mutation, suggesting that mutations
in p53 cis-regulatory regions or pathway components may be more likely.
Significantly, p53 may act as a common node for developmental defects not only in CHARGE but
also in other developmental syndromes, such as 22q11 deletion syndrome[29]. Indeed, p53 activation by ribosome dysfunction
provokes NCC deficiency and craniofacial defects[30]. Future studies will reveal precisely how p53 contributes to CHARGE
syndrome and potentially the broader spectrum of humancraniofacial-cardiac developmental
syndromes.
METHODS SECTION
Mouse Breeding and Analysis
Conditional p53 mutant mice were described previously[3,5].
p53 males were crossed to
CMV-Cre females and timed pregnancies conducted[31]. Genotyping analysis was performed using
yolk sac DNA. Males were identified using the Y-chromosome-specific Zfy
PCR. As reported[31], we observed mosaic
Cre activity in some embryos, reflected by incomplete or no Lox-Stop-Lox
deletion in PCR analysis of yolk sac and in p53 immunohistochemical analysis in embryos.
Embryos that showed little to no recombination of the Lox-Stop-Lox allele
were kept separate for all analyses. In the text and figure labels, the Cre nomenclature
for both control and p53 embryos is excluded for
simplicity. The genotypes of p53mice carrying a
CMV-Cre transgene lack the LSL designation because the
Lox-Stop-Lox element has been deleted from the genome. Controls in
analyses comprise littermate embryos both with and without the CMV-Cre
transgene (Extended-Data Figure 3). Mice were
maintained on a mixed 129/Sv;C57BL/6J background. Chd7-deficient
gene-trapped mice were described previously[21]. Controls for embryo somite number rescue analysis comprise
Chd7 and
Chd7 embryos. Sample
sizes were estimated based on previous work in embryogenesis in order to be able to reach
statistically significant conclusions. For example, using a χ2-test we
can estimate it would require 24 embryos in order to obtain a significance level of 5% if
all homozygous embryos were inviable and from a heterozygous mating where homozygotes
should represent 25% of total based on Mendelian ratio. All animal work was done in
accordance with the Stanford University APLAC.
Embryo Tissue Analysis
Embryos were examined under a dissecting microscope for the presence of a
heartbeat and for other abnormalities, in a blinded fashion, prior to genotyping, and
photographs of either fixed or live embryos were taken using the dissecting microscope.
Live mice are determined by the presence of a heartbeat. All analyses were performed on
embryos of specified ages as determined by the expected stage of tissue and organ
development in control embryos. Within age groups, embryos were randomly assigned for
analysis of individual tissues. Heart, inner ear, and craniofacial analysis was performed
with the assistance of collaborators who were blinded to the genotypes. Histological
analysis was performed on hematoxylin and eosin-stained paraffin-embedded sagittal,
coronal, or transverse embryo sections using standard protocols. Consecutive 7 μm
sections were evaluated for heart and craniofacial analyses. Whole-mount images for
craniofacial analysis were created by staining embryos in 70% ethanol with ethidium
bromide and imaging with UV light. Whole-mount cleaved-caspase 3 staining was performed as
described[32] with
anti-cleaved-caspase 3 antibody (Cell Signaling #9664) and developed with DAB (Vector
Labs). Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence were performed as described with
anti-cleaved-caspase 3 antibody (Cell Signaling #9664), anti-BrdU (BD Bioscience 347580),
anti-p53 (CM5, Vector Labs), anti-Pax3 (Iowa Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) and
human anti-p53 (Ab1801, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) on paraformaldehyde-fixed,
paraffin-embedded tissue and developed with either DAB (Vector Labs) or imaged with
confocal microscope. For BrdU staining, embryos were pulsed prior to dissection for 20
minutes with 0.1mg/gram of body weight. Cleaved-Caspase 3 and BrdU positive cells were
quantified and normalized to area, number of sections, or total cell number. Bone and
cartilage staining was performed as described using Alizarin Red and Alcian Blue to stain
bone and cartilage, respectively[33]. Bone
lengths were quantified from measurements on photomicrographs taken at 6.3×. The
areas of the kidney and thymus were calculated from measurements on photomicrographs taken
at 200X magnification. Inner ear analysis using the paint-fill assay was performed as
described; paint-filled ears were imaged in brightfield using a Leica DMRB
stereoscope[34]. All individuals with
affected ears that could be scored for both ears exhibited a similar severity of the
defect in the two ears. Additionally, while different types of analyses precluded
investigation of all phenotypes in particular embryos, these defects commonly occurred in
combination: for example, coloboma and inner ear defects occurred together in 57% of
p53 embryos examined.
qRT-PCR
For qRT-PCR, MEFs were cultured at subconfluency, RNA was isolated by Trizol
extraction and reverse transcribed using MMLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and
random primers, and PCR was performed in triplicate using SYBR green (Qiagen, Bio-Rad) and
mouse-specific primers for each gene (Supplemental Methods Table 1a) in a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR machine (Applied
Biosystems). Results were computed relative to a standard curve made with cDNA pooled from
all samples[3]. Human fibroblasts were
cultured at subconfluency in DMEM with 20% serum or 0.1% serum for 24 hour prior to RNA
isolation by Trizol extraction and qRT-PCR performed as above using SYBR Green and
human-specific primers for each gene (Supplemental Methods Table 1b).
Cell Culture, Western Blot Analysis, and Immunoprecipitation
Mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) were derived from E13.5 embryos. For stable
overexpressing MEF lines, wild-type and p53-null MEFs were transduced
with pWZL-based retroviruses expressing FLAG-p53+,
FLAG-p5325,26,53,54, or empty vector as described[5]. Mutant p53 constructs were made via site-directed mutagenesis
to bear L25Q;W26S and F53Q;F54S mutations found to incapacitate p53’s
transactivation capability. In summary, a p53 cDNA, generated from mouse
embryonic fibroblast RNA, was amplified and engineered with Asc1 and Pac1 restriction
enzyme sites using primers against the second amino acid through the STOP codon. The
amplified DNA was subcloned into a pBlueScript construct with the multiple cloning site
replaced with Asc1 and Pac1 sites. The p53 cDNA underwent site-directed
mutagenesis (TTATGG -> CAATCG and TTTTTT -> CAGTCT) to generate the four
mutations. The mutated p53 cDNA was confirmed by sequencing and subcloned
into the appropriate expression vectors (pWZL or pcDNA) that contain 3 copies of either
the HA or FLAG tag at the N-terminus and Asc1 and Pac1 sites instead of the multiple
cloning sites. For Western blot analysis, cells were left untreated, treated with
0.2μg/ml doxorubicin (Dox) for eight hours, or transfected using X-tremeGENE HP
(Roche) for 24 hours with pcDNA constructs (FLAG-p53, FLAG-p5325,26,53,54,
HA-p53, or empty vector). Cells were collected and lysed using RIPA buffer. Western blots
were probed with anti-p53 (1:500 CM5 Vector), anti-wild-type p53 (pAB242, kind gift of
David Lane and Borivoj Vojtesek)[35],
anti-FLAG (1:1000 Sigma F3165), anti-HA (1:1000 Sigma H6908), and anti-Actin (1:30,000
Sigma A2228). Immunoprecipitation was performed on MEFs transfected with pcDNA constructs
(FLAG-p53, FLAG-p5325,26,53,54, HA-p53, FLAG-eGFP, or HA-MBP) using M2
anti-FLAG agarose beads (Sigma A2220). Dox-treated
p53 (Figure
3a, Lane 6) and p53 (Figure 3a, Lane 4) MEFs control for wild-type
p53-specific antibody activity and specificity, respectively. Cells were lysed using RIPA
buffer, lysates were added to anti-FLAG beads to allow binding of FLAG protein, and bound
protein was retrieved by addition of sample buffer and centrifugation of beads. 10% input
was used for western blot analysis. Human fibroblasts were grown in DMEM with 20% serum
and lysed using RIPA buffer or incubated in 0.1% serum for 24 hours prior to collection
for RNA. Western blots were probed with anti-p53 (DO-1, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Differentiation of mouseChd7 and
Chd7 (whi/whi) embryonic
stem cells (ESCs) into neural crest cells (NCCs) was performed using an adaptation of a
previously-described protocol[18,19] that was further characterized by
Rada-Iglesias et al[36]. Importantly, loss
of Chd7 leads to defects in migratory neural crest cells, without affecting induction of
neural crest cells, allowing generation of the cells for this analysis[18]. Validation of Neural Crest Cell phenotype
was performed by assessing gene expression of neural crest cell markers, Wnt1,
Snai1, and Pax3 (Supplemental Methods Table 1a).
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Analysis of p53 binding was performed on Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts of
different genotypes. 30-40×10^7 cells were collected for Chromatin
Immunoprecipitation (ChIP), as previously described, using anti-p53 (CM5, Vector
Laboratories)[37]. In brief, cells
were crosslinked following trypsinization with 1% formaldehyde and quenched with glycine.
Chromatin was sheared using Bioruptor sonicator (Diagenode), then immunoprecipitated with
anti-p53–Dynabeads complex overnight. IP’d DNA was washed, and
reverse-crosslinked and isolated using Qiagen PCR clean-up kit. IP’d DNA was
analyzed using qPCR using binding site specific primers (Supplemental Methods Table 2) and
normalized to input. Analysis of p53 binding site affinities was based on previously
reported ChIP-seq data and a p53-binding site algorithm[17,37]. Analysis of Chd7
binding was performed using anti-Chd7 on neural crest-like cells differentiated from
wild-type or Chd7-null (whi/whi) Embryonic Stem Cells using the same
protocol as above[18].
Human Samples
All human work was conducted under human subjects protocols approved by the
Stanford Institutional Review Board (IRB), the University of Michigan UM-IRBMED, and the
Ethical Committee of d’Ile de France II (N° 2009-164). Informed consent was
obtained from participants in the study. Human fibroblasts were obtained by skin biopsy
under local anesthesia from CHARGEpatients with CHD7 mutations and
unaffected patients. Thymi were obtained from pregnancies terminated for severe
malformations, in accordance with French law, after genetic counselling, between 24 and 37
weeks of gestation. Detailed clinicopathological examination allowed the diagnosis of
CHARGE syndrome, confirmed by CHD7 molecular analysis that identified a
de novo nonsense mutation in each. Age matched control thymi were
obtained from fetuses with isolated brain malformation.TP53 exome sequence was analyzed in a group of 25
CHD7-mutation-negative patients with features of CHARGE syndrome, which
were selected in the cohort based on the availability of parental DNA for segregation
analysis, in case a variant was found. All TP53 coding exons were
analyzed by direct sequencing of PCR products comprising the 10 coding exons and the
adjacent intronic junctions of TP53 isoform 2 (exons 2 to 11, reference
sequence NM_001126112.2) and the alternatively spliced exon 10 of isoforms 3 and 4
(reference sequences NM_001126114.2 and NM_001126113.2). This analysis failed to reveal
any mutations within the coding region (i.e. no sequence changes apart from already known
SNPs).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical tests used were the Student’s t-test (equal variance),
Welsh’s t-test (unequal variance), Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric test), and
Binomial Distribution test. Due to presence of embryos with little or no recombination of
the Lox-Stop-Lox allele, Binomial Distribution analysis was used to
exclude these embryos and determine statistical significance for the viability of
p53 embryos at each embryonic timepoint.
Additional statistical analysis, with the assistance of the Stanford Biostatistics Core,
was performed to assess viability over multiple embryonic timepoints of
CMV-Cre;p53 embryos that were recombined
versus not recombined, as scored by PCR analysis (Extended-Data Table 2).The number of dead p53 embryos, as a
proportion of the total (dead plus alive) was also analyzed using logistic regression,
with a factor for genotype and a factor for gestational age. Because some of the totals
were small, we assessed significance using a permutation test, comparing the observed
phenotype (ratio of dead embryos) to a set of 10,000 random permutations of the phenotype
(keeping the number of dead and total numbers unchanged at each time point and re-fitting
the logistic regression). Note that this analysis assumes the effect of clustering within
dams is negligible. The P value for the permutation test was 0.0234: 234 out of 10,000
random permutations showed a greater frequency of death in absolute value than the
frequency of death observed for p53 embryos; the
P value from logistic regression software was P=0.0003. A model allowing for a continuous
effect of gestational age was also fit to explore whether the genotype affected the rate
of change in hazard of death: the slopes over time for
p53 and controls were significantly different
P=0.0245, despite the confidence intervals at each individual time being wide and
overlapping.
Model for Examining p53-Associated Developmental Phenotypes
(a) Schematic of p5325,26, p5353,54,
and p5325,26,53,54 mutant p53 proteins. TAD: Transactivation Domain 1 or
2, PRD: Proline-Rich Domain, Tet: Tetramerization Domain, Basic: Basic Residue-Rich
Domain. (b)
p53mice (where mut can denote any of the p53
TAD mutants) were crossed to p53mice, which
express Cre in the germline, to assess viability and developmental phenotypes of the
p53 mutant-expressing progeny. (c) Table summarizing
the actual genotypes and ultimate functional genotypes of progeny from crosses of
p53 and
p53mice, as used throughout the
manuscript. While
p53;CMV-Cre is the
actual initial genotype, when Cre acts to delete the Lox-Stop-Lox
cassette, the genotype will be written as
p53 to reflect this recombination. In the
text and figure labels, the Cre nomenclature for both control and
p53 embryos is excluded for simplicity.
Controls for analyses comprise embryos both with and without the
CMV-Cre transgene, as summarized in Extended-Data Fig. 3.
p53 Mice, but not
p53 or
p53 Mice, are Viable
(a) Crosses of p53
with p53 or
p53mice reveal a decrease in viable
pups expressing p5325,26 at E9.5-E10.5. Observed numbers of live and dead
pups compared to the expected numbers of live pups are indicated. [Observed
(Expected)] The genotypes of p53 and
p53mice carrying a
CMV-Cre transgene lack the LSL designation because the
Lox-Stop-Lox element has been deleted from the genome.
Significance as assessed by Binomial distribution statistical tests on live pups:
p=0.18 and 0.09 (b) Crosses of p53 with
p53mice reveal that
p53mice, but not
p53mice, are viable as assessed at
postnatal day 21 (P21). Mut denotes either mutant allele. Observed numbers of pups
compared to the expected numbers of pups are indicated. [Observed (Expected)] The
genotypes of p53 and
p53mice carrying a
CMV-Cre transgene lack the LSL designation because the
Lox-Stop-Lox element has been deleted from the genome. Lack of
pups is significant at P21 as assessed by Binomial distribution statistical tests on
live pups: p53 and
p53: *p<=3.42E-05,
p53: **p=4.77E-07 (c)
Whole-mount images of a p53 embryo (right) at
E9.5 displaying developmental delay (top) and neural tube defects, including
exencephaly and kinked spine (bottom), compared to littermate control (left).
(d)
p53mice display a shortened
lifespan (median lifespan 128 days, n=8) compared to wild-type mice (median lifespan
774 days) and a similar lifespan to p53mice (median lifespan 143 days), further indicating that the
p53 allele itself behaves like a
p53 null allele. p<0.0001 by Mantel-Cox statistical
analysis comparing wild-type and p53 25,26,53,54/− mice
Genotypes of Control Embryos in Figures and the Genders Associated with
Phenotypes
(a) Table identifying the genotypes of control embryos shown
for each analysis. (b) The table shows the number of male and female
p53 embryos observed with the indicated
phenotypes, as assessed by Zfy PCR. Phenotypes are well represented
in both sexes.
p53 Embryos Exhibit Additional
Features of CHARGE Syndrome
(a) H&E-stained sections of E12.5 control (left) and
p53 embryos (right). Examination
confirmed neural tube closure defects (arrow). (b) Close-up image of
UV-illuminated, ethidium bromide-stained E15.5
p53 embryo (right) to highlight short
lower jaw phenotype with protruding tongue (arrow) compared to control littermate
(left). 74% (n=27) of p53 embryos exhibited
short lower jaw. Cleft lip not shown. (c) Top: Alizarin Red (bone) and
Alcian Blue (cartilage) whole-mount stained E15.0
p53 embryo (right) showing reduced bone
density in the cranium (c) and nasal cavity (n); shorter ulna (u), humerus (h),
mandible (m), and femur (f); and reduced bone formation in the ribs (R), where fewer
vertebrae are undergoing ossification relative to control littermate (left). Number
of vertebrae with bone formation: 19 in control (arrow; V19) versus 18 in
p53 embryo (arrow; V18). The severity
of bone and cartilage defects is variable, with the most severe defects evident in
embryos with exencephaly and severe craniofacial defects. n=7. Bottom:
Quantification of bone lengths shown as percent of E14.5-15.0 littermate controls.
Bone lengths of the mandible, humerus, ulna, and femur were measured using the ruler
function in Adobe Photoshop on images taken at 6.3×. Only litters with
detectable bone formation in p53 embryos
were included in bone length analyses. Student’s T-test **p=0.008 (mandible),
**p=0.005 (humerus). (d) Representative images of H&E-stained
sagittal sections of E12.5 control (left) and
p53 hearts (right) showing all three
cardiac cell types in both genotypes. en: endocardium; ep: epicardium; myo:
myocardium (arrows). (e) H&E-stained E12.5
p53 heart exhibiting persistent truncus
arteriosus (PTA) (33%, n=6). The cardiac outflow tract in the control embryo (left)
is septated into the aorta (Ao) and main pulmonary artery (MPA), whereas the cardiac
outflow tract (truncus arteriosus or TA) in the
p53 embryo (right) remains unseptated,
resulting in PTA. (f) Illustration of control heart (left) and
p53 embryo heart (right), highlighting
DORV and atrioventricular cushion defects. Both the aorta (Ao) and main pulmonary
artery (MPA) flow out from the right ventricle (RV), resulting in mixed oxygenated
and deoxygenated blood in systemic circulation when combined with concurrent VSDs
(ventricular septal defects). The atrioventricular cushions remain bulbous and fail
to elongate into mature valve leaflets (mitral valve: mv; tricuspid valve: tv). Red:
oxygenated blood; Blue: deoxygenated blood; Purple/Pink: mixed
oxygenated/deoxygenated blood. (g) Representative H&E-stained
transverse section of thymus in p53 E15.5
embryo (right) reveals smaller thymus compared to control littermate (left) (63% of
control; n=4). (h) Representative H&E analysis of liver sections
from E12.5 control (left) and p53 embryos
(right) showing normal liver architecture in both genotypes (top). High
magnification image (bottom) of the region of the liver outlined by the white box in
the top panel shows the presence of nucleated erythrocytes (arrows), indicating
proper hematopoiesis. (i) Top: Table summarizing the incidence (%) and
sample size (n) for phenotypes assessed qualitatively in
p53 embryos. The occurrence of these
phenotypes in CHARGE syndrome is also indicated (+ present, − absent).
Bottom: Table summarizing phenotypes assessed quantitatively in
p53 embryos relative to controls, shown
as the percent average size of controls (%), with sample size (n) also indicated.
The occurrence of these phenotypes in CHARGE syndrome is also shown (+ present).
Detailed description of bone and cartilage defects can be found in Extended-Data Fig. 4c.
p53 Embryos Do Not Exhibit
Characteristics of CHARGE Syndrome
(a) Whole-mount image of the external ear of E15.5
p53 embryo (right) and control
embryo (left) showing normal ear pinna development. (b) Whole mount
image of E13.5 p53 embryo (right) and
control embryo (left) showing normal retinal development and no evidence of
coloboma. (c) Whole-mount image of E15.5
p53 embryo (right) and control
embryo (left) with normal lower jaw development. (d) Alizarin Red
(bone) and Alcian Blue (cartilage) whole-mount stained E14.5
p53 embryo (right) showing normal
long bone formation of the ulna (u), humerus (h), mandible (m), and femur (f)
relative to control littermate (left). Bottom: Quantification of bone lengths shown
as percent of E14.5 littermate controls (n=3). (e) Representative
images of H&E-stained sagittal sections of E13.5 control (left) and
p53 hearts (right) showing all
three cardiac cell types in both genotypes. en: endocardium; ep: epicardium; myo:
myocardium (arrows). (f) Analysis of H&E-stained transverse
sections of E13.5 p53 and control
hearts revealing normal outflow tract development. (Top) The main pulmonary artery
(MPA) and aorta (Ao) are fully septated, and the MPA connects to the right ventricle
(RV) in p53 hearts. (Bottom) The aorta
connects to the left ventricle (LV). Φventricular outflow tract
that connects the left ventricle and aorta. PV: pulmonary valve, AV: aortic valve
(g) Analysis of transverse sections of H&E-stained E13.5
p53 hearts (right) reveals normal
atrioventricular cushions which have remodeled to form mature, elongated mitral (mv,
arrowhead) and tricuspid (tv, arrow) valves similar to control hearts (left). RA:
right atrium; LA: left atrium; RV: right ventricle; LV: left ventricle.
(h) H&E-stained sagittal section of kidney from
p53 (right) and control embryos
(left) showing normal renal size and development. (i) H&E-stained
transverse section of thymi in p53
E13.5 embryo (right) reveals similar thymus size compared to control littermate
(left).
p53 Embryo Tissues Display Increased
Apoptosis and Decreased Proliferation
(a) Left: Immunofluorescence for Phospho-Histone H3 (red) in
the retina of E13.5 control and p53
embryos. Right: Quantification of Phospho-Histone H3 positive cells per retina area
relative to littermate controls. **p-value=0.006 by one-tailed Welsh’s t-test
(n=4). (b) Left: Immunohistochemistry for cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3) in
thymi of control (left) and p53 (right)
embryos. Inset: close-up image of cleaved-caspase 3 positive region. Right:
Quantification of CC3-positive cells per thymic area. *p-value=0.02 by one-tailed
Student’s t-test (n=4). (c) Immunofluorescence for Pax3 (green)
in neural crest cells of E9.5 control and
p53 embryos was used to identify neural
crest cells in Figure 2f. (d)
Left: Immunofluorescence for cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3, red) and Pax3 (green) in neural
crest cells of E9.5 control and p53
embryos. p53 embryos have more apoptotic
(red) neural crest cells, as determined by Pax3-positive staining (green), compared
to control littermates. Right: Quantification of CC3 positive cells per total neural
crest cell number. p-value=0.14 by one-tailed Student’s t-test (n=4).
(e) Left: Immunofluorescence for cleaved-caspase 3 (CC3, red) in otic
vesicle of E9.5 control and p53 embryos.
Right: Quantification of CC3 positive cells per total cell number. *p-value=0.03 by
one-tailed Student’s t-test (n=3). (f) Whole-mount
cleaved-caspase 3 staining in E8.5 control and
p53 embryos reveals enhanced apoptosis in
the neuroepithelium of p53 embryos (right)
but not in controls (left). Close-up shows magnification of the caudal
neuroepithelium (bottom). Arrows indicate cleaved-caspase 3 positive regions.
p5325,26,53,54 is Transactivation-Dead but Augments Wild-Type p53
Activity
(a) Western blot analysis of p53 protein levels in untreated
or doxorubicin-treated (0.2 μg/ml Dox)
p53, and
p53 MEFs. Actin serves as a loading
control. (b) Western blot analysis of anti-FLAG immunoprecipitation
from p53 MEFs transiently
overexpressing HA-p53 and FLAG-p53 or FLAG-p5325,26,53,54. HA-MBP and
FLAG-eGFP were used as negative controls. Immunoprecipitated protein and 10% input
were probed with either anti-HA or anti-FLAG. (μg ratio of HA-p53 to FLAG-p53
or FLAG-p5325,26,53,54 plasmid DNA: 1:1 or 1:2.5). (Supplement to Fig. 3b) (c) Heat map examining the
transactivation capacity of p5325,26,53,54 on p53-dependent genes
identified by microarray analysis through comparison of six
HrasV12;p53 wild-type mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) lines to six
HrasV12;p53null MEF lines, as previously
described[3]. Three independent
HrasV12;p53 MEFs lines were
analyzed, and showed that the gene expression profiles were indistinguishable from
HrasV12;p53 null cells. Numbered columns indicate independent MEF
lines. Blue – repressed genes; Red – induced genes. (d)
qRT-PCR analysis of p53 target gene expression in untreated MEFs derived from
p53 and
p53 E13.5 embryos. Graphs indicate
averages from four independent MEF lines, +/−SD, after normalization to
β-actin. **,*** denote p-values of <0.01, and
<0.005, respectively, by Student’s t-test analysis. (e)
qRT-PCR analysis of p53 target gene expression in p53
and p53 MEFs stably transduced with
empty vector, FLAG-p53, or FLAG-p5325,26,53,54. Representative gene
expression from one experiment. +/−SD of technical triplicates after
normalization to β-actin.
(a) qRT-PCR analysis of Chd7 in untreated
MEFs derived from E13.5 p53 and
p53 embryos. Graphs indicate averages
from four independent MEF lines, +/−s.d., after normalization to
β-actin. ns=non-significant. (b) Left:
Schematic of neural crest cell differentiation. Right: Representative qRT-PCR
analysis of neural crest cell markers in neural crest-like cells differentiated from
Chd7 and
Chd7 (whi/whi) mouse
embryonic stem cells normalized to β-actin and compared to
matched embryonic stem cells. (c) H&E-stained E10.5
Chd7 (control),
Chd7 and
Chd7
embryos. The Chd7
embryo shown is necrotic as evidenced by cellular autolysis. (d)
Close-up image of heart region, denoted by red box in panel c, in E10.5
Chd7 (control) and
Chd7
embryos.
Authors: Stuart D Tyner; Sundaresan Venkatachalam; Jene Choi; Stephen Jones; Nader Ghebranious; Herbert Igelmann; Xiongbin Lu; Gabrielle Soron; Benjamin Cooper; Cory Brayton; Sang Hee Park; Timothy Thompson; Gerard Karsenty; Allan Bradley; Lawrence A Donehower Journal: Nature Date: 2002-01-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: D P Lane; C W Stephen; C A Midgley; A Sparks; T R Hupp; D A Daniels; R Greaves; A Reid; B Vojtesek; S M Picksley Journal: Oncogene Date: 1996-06-06 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Nicole Corsten-Janssen; Wilhelmina S Kerstjens-Frederikse; Gideon J du Marchie Sarvaas; Maria E Baardman; Marian K Bakker; Jorieke E H Bergman; Hanne D Hove; Ketil R Heimdal; Cecilie F Rustad; Raoul C M Hennekam; Robert M W Hofstra; Lies H Hoefsloot; Conny M A Van Ravenswaaij-Arts; Livia Kapusta Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Genet Date: 2013-06
Authors: Stephanie A Balow; Lain X Pierce; Gabriel E Zentner; Patricia A Conrad; Stephani Davis; Hatem E Sabaawy; Brian M McDermott; Peter C Scacheri Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Christopher J Lengner; Heather A Steinman; James Gagnon; Thomas W Smith; Janet E Henderson; Barbara E Kream; Gary S Stein; Jane B Lian; Stephen N Jones Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2006-03-13 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Catherine Bélanger; Félix-Antoine Bérubé-Simard; Elizabeth Leduc; Guillaume Bernas; Philippe M Campeau; Seema R Lalani; Donna M Martin; Stephanie Bielas; Amanda Moccia; Anshika Srivastava; David W Silversides; Nicolas Pilon Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ratnam S Seelan; Partha Mukhopadhyay; Dennis R Warner; Savitri N Appana; Guy N Brock; M Michele Pisano; Robert M Greene Journal: Microrna Date: 2014
Authors: Margot E Bowen; Jacob McClendon; Hannah K Long; Aryo Sorayya; Jeanine L Van Nostrand; Joanna Wysocka; Laura D Attardi Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 12.270