Literature DB >> 25118330

Low-dose CT for patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis: optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance.

Seung Ho Kim1, Jung-Hee Yoon2, Jang Hee Lee2, Yun-Jung Lim2, Ok Hwa Kim2, Ji Hwa Ryu2, Jung-Hee Son2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As there is increased concern over the radiation exposure particularly in adolescents and young adults, computed tomography (CT) dose reduction is needed in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) to obtain the best image quality on a 30-mAs applied low-dose CT (LDCT 30mAs) and to compare the diagnostic performances of the LDCT 30mAs with different SAFIRE strengths with that of the 100-mAs applied LDCT (LDCT 100mAs) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 102 consecutive patients (47 men, 55 women; mean age, 41.2 years; range, 15-82 years) with right lower quadrant pain underwent abdominal-pelvic CT, consisting of arterial phase LDCT 100mAs and portal venous phase LDCT30mAs under a fixed 120 kV. LDCT 30mAs images were reconstructed separately with five strength levels (S1-S5). Two blinded radiologists recorded scores for the subjective image quality of the LDCT 30mAs dataset (S0-S5) and confidence scores for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis on each dataset and LDCT 100mAs. CT image noise was measured for each set.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 58 patients with confirmed appendicitis and 44 without appendicitis. There was no significant difference in diagnostic performance between LDCT 100mAs and LDCT 30mAs with any strength for both readers (AUC for reader 1, LDCT 30mAs with S0-S5 = 0.97, LDCT 100mAs = 0.93, P = 0.0936; for reader 2, LDCT 30mAs with S0-S5 = 0.96, LDCT 100mAs = 0.97, P = 0.128). The measured noise decreased as the strength increased from S0 to S5 (mean, 20.8 > 17.7 > 15.6 > 13.5 > 11.5 > 9.5, P < 0.0001). However, overall subjective image quality on S3 was better than the other strengths for both readers (S0 < S1 < S2 < S3 > S4 > S5, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Although measured noise declined as SAFIRE strength increased, S3 seems optimal for the best subjective image quality on LDCT 30mAs. The diagnostic performance of LDCT 30mAs with any strength is comparable to that of LDCT 100mAs for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Iterative reconstruction; appendicitis; computed tomography; image reconstruction; radiation dosage

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25118330     DOI: 10.1177/0284185114542297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

1.  Emergency assessment of patients with acute abdominal pain using low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: a comparative study.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Minerva Becker; Christoph D Becker; Alice Halfon Poletti; Olivier T Rutschmann; Habib Zaidi; Thomas Perneger; Alexandra Platon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging in acute appendicitis: What, when, and why?

Authors:  Jyotindu Debnath; R A George; R Ravikumar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2016-03-29

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT compared with abdominal radiography in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain: prospective study and systematic review.

Authors:  Muhammed Alshamari; Eva Norrman; Mats Geijer; Kjell Jansson; Håkan Geijer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Application of 80-kVp scan and raw data-based iterative reconstruction for reduced iodine load abdominal-pelvic CT in patients at risk of contrast-induced nephropathy referred for oncological assessment: effects on radiation dose, image quality and renal function.

Authors:  Yasunori Nagayama; Shota Tanoue; Akinori Tsuji; Joji Urata; Mitsuhiro Furusawa; Seitaro Oda; Takeshi Nakaura; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Eri Yoshida; Morikatsu Yoshida; Masafumi Kidoh; Machiko Tateishi; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Comparison of Imaging Strategies with Conditional versus Immediate Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in Patients with Clinical Suspicion of Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; A Van Randen; W Laméris; H W van Es; J P M van Heesewijk; B van Ramshorst; W H Bouma; W Ten Hove; E M van Keulen; M G W Dijkgraaf; P M M Bossuyt; J Stoker; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Evaluating Suspected Appendicitis in Adolescents and Young Adults: Review of Evidence.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Park; Paulina Salminen; Penampai Tannaphai; Kyoung Ho Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 7.109

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.