William G Shadel1, Maria Orlando Edelen2, Joan S Tucker3, Brian D Stucky3, Mark Hansen4, Li Cai4. 1. RAND Health, RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA; shadel@rand.org. 2. RAND Health, RAND Corporation, Boston, MA; 3. RAND Health, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA; 4. CSE/CRESST, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Nicotine dependence is a core construct important for understanding cigarette smoking and smoking cessation behavior. This article describes analyses conducted to develop and evaluate item banks for assessing nicotine dependence among daily and nondaily smokers. METHODS: Using data from a sample of daily (N = 4,201) and nondaily (N =1,183) smokers, we conducted a series of item factor analyses, item response theory analyses, and differential item functioning analyses (according to gender, age, and race/ethnicity) to arrive at a unidimensional set of nicotine dependence items for daily and nondaily smokers. We also evaluated performance of short forms (SFs) and computer adaptive tests (CATs) to efficiently assess dependence. RESULTS: A total of 32 items were included in the Nicotine Dependence item banks; 22 items are common across daily and nondaily smokers, 5 are unique to daily smokers, and 5 are unique to nondaily smokers. For both daily and nondaily smokers, the Nicotine Dependence item banks are strongly unidimensional, highly reliable (reliability = 0.97 and 0.97, respectively), and perform similarly across gender, age, and race/ethnicity groups. SFs common to daily and nondaily smokers consist of 8 and 4 items (reliability = 0.91 and 0.81, respectively). Results from simulated CATs showed that dependence can be assessed with very good precision for most respondents using fewer than 6 items adaptively selected from the item banks. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine dependence on cigarettes can be assessed on the basis of these item banks via one of the SFs, by using CATs, or through a tailored set of items selected for a specific research purpose.
INTRODUCTION:Nicotine dependence is a core construct important for understanding cigarette smoking and smoking cessation behavior. This article describes analyses conducted to develop and evaluate item banks for assessing nicotine dependence among daily and nondaily smokers. METHODS: Using data from a sample of daily (N = 4,201) and nondaily (N =1,183) smokers, we conducted a series of item factor analyses, item response theory analyses, and differential item functioning analyses (according to gender, age, and race/ethnicity) to arrive at a unidimensional set of nicotine dependence items for daily and nondaily smokers. We also evaluated performance of short forms (SFs) and computer adaptive tests (CATs) to efficiently assess dependence. RESULTS: A total of 32 items were included in the Nicotine Dependence item banks; 22 items are common across daily and nondaily smokers, 5 are unique to daily smokers, and 5 are unique to nondaily smokers. For both daily and nondaily smokers, the Nicotine Dependence item banks are strongly unidimensional, highly reliable (reliability = 0.97 and 0.97, respectively), and perform similarly across gender, age, and race/ethnicity groups. SFs common to daily and nondaily smokers consist of 8 and 4 items (reliability = 0.91 and 0.81, respectively). Results from simulated CATs showed that dependence can be assessed with very good precision for most respondents using fewer than 6 items adaptively selected from the item banks. CONCLUSIONS:Nicotine dependence on cigarettes can be assessed on the basis of these item banks via one of the SFs, by using CATs, or through a tailored set of items selected for a specific research purpose.
Authors: Megan E Piper; Thomas M Piasecki; E Belle Federman; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2004-04
Authors: Saul Shiffman; Stuart G Ferguson; Chad J Gwaltney; Mark H Balabanis; William G Shadel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Timothy B Baker; Megan E Piper; Danielle E McCarthy; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Su-Young Kim; Suzanne Colby; David Conti; Gary A Giovino; Dorothy Hatsukami; Andrew Hyland; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Raymond Niaura; Kenneth A Perkins; Benjamin A Toll Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Wenjing Huang; Brian D Stucky; Maria O Edelen; Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Mark Hansen; Li Cai Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-01-31 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Meghan E Morean; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Steve Sussman; Jonathan Foulds; Howard Fishbein; Rachel Grana; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-10-26 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Elizabeth Antognoli; David Cavallo; Erika Trapl; Mary Step; Sarah Koopman Gonzalez; Rose Perez; Susan Flocke Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Krysten W Bold; Steve Sussman; Stephanie S O'Malley; Rachel Grana; Jonathan Foulds; Howard Fishbein; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Maria Orlando Edelen; Brian D Stucky; Mark Hansen; Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Li Cai Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Karina Newhall; Bjoern Suckow; Emily Spangler; Benjamin S Brooke; Andres Schanzer; Tze-Woei Tan; Mary Burnette; Maria Orlando Edelen; Alik Farber; Philip Goodney Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 1.466