Literature DB >> 25117626

Ability of 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT to detect incidental cancer.

Y Sone1, A Sobajima, T Kawachi, S Kohara, K Kato, S Naganawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and clinical features of pathologically proven incidental cancer (IC) detected by whole-body fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, as well as the incidence of false-positive and false-negative results.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed reports derived from (18)F-FDG PET/CT images of 3079 consecutive patients with known or suspected malignancies for 3 years. Discrete focal uptake indicating IC was identified from reports as well as pathological or clinical diagnoses, and the clinical courses were investigated. The false-positive result was defined as uptake indicating IC but not pathologically confirmed as malignant during follow-up. The false-negative result was defined as pathologically proven IC detected by another modality at initial clinical work-up or diagnosed during the follow-up period.
RESULTS: We found (18)F-FDG uptake indicating IC in 6.7% of all patients, and IC was pathologically proven in 2.2% of all patients. The most common sites were the colon, lung and stomach. The median survival duration of patients with IC was 42 months. The results were false positive in 4.5% of all patients, and the results were false negative in 2.3% of all patients.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT is a valuable tool for detecting IC. The rates of false-positive and false-negative results are within acceptable range. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first report to describe the survival of patients with IC, and the detailed features of false-negative results at actual clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25117626      PMCID: PMC4170860          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  22 in total

1.  PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance.

Authors:  Ora Israel; Nikolay Yefremov; Rachel Bar-Shalom; Olga Kagana; Alex Frenkel; Zohar Keidar; Doron Fischer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Incidental carcinomas detected by PET/CT scans in patients with malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  Kazuya Sato; Katsutoshi Ozaki; Shin-ichiro Fujiwara; Iekuni Oh; Tomohiro Matsuyama; Ken Ohmine; Takahiro Suzuki; Masaki Mori; Tadashi Nagai; Kazuo Muroi; Keiya Ozawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT: referring physicians' point of view.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karantanis; Dimitrios Kalkanis; Martin Allen-Auerbach; Trond Velde Bogsrud; Rathan M Subramaniam; Adam Danielson; Val J Lowe; Johannes Czernin
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Detection of unexpected additional primary malignancies with PET/CT.

Authors:  Takayoshi Ishimori; Pavni V Patel; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Detection of clinically unexpected malignant and premalignant tumors with whole-body FDG PET: histopathologic comparison.

Authors:  Harry Agress; Benjamin Z Cooper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Clinical applications of PET in oncology.

Authors:  Eric M Rohren; Timothy G Turkington; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Pitfalls and artifacts in 18FDG PET and PET/CT oncologic imaging.

Authors:  Gary J R Cook; Eva A Wegner; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  Clinical performance of PET/CT in evaluation of cancer: additional value for diagnostic imaging and patient management.

Authors:  Rachel Bar-Shalom; Nikolai Yefremov; Ludmila Guralnik; Diana Gaitini; Alex Frenkel; Abraham Kuten; Hernan Altman; Zohar Keidar; Ora Israel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  The current status of an FDG-PET cancer screening program in Japan, based on a 4-year (2006-2009) nationwide survey.

Authors:  Ryogo Minamimoto; Michio Senda; Seishi Jinnouchi; Takashi Terauchi; Tsuyoshi Yoshida; Takeshi Murano; Hiroshi Fukuda; Takeshi Iinuma; Kimiichi Uno; Sadahiko Nishizawa; Eriko Tsukamoto; Hiroshi Iwata; Takeshi Inoue; Kazuhiro Oguchi; Rumi Nakashima; Tomio Inoue
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 2.668

View more
  6 in total

1.  Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Focal 18F-FDG Uptake in Colon on PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Yasemin Gökden; Filiz Özülker; Tamer Özülker
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Assessment of incidental focal colorectal uptake by analysis of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters.

Authors:  Haejun Lee; Kyung-Hoon Hwang; Kwang An Kwon
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 1.534

Review 3.  Evidence-based management of incidental focal uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose on PET-CT.

Authors:  Deborah Pencharz; Malavika Nathan; Thomas L Wagner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Incidentalomas of the prostate detected by 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Miles P Mannas; Taeweon Lee; Maral Pourghiasian; Don C Wilson; Peter C Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  PET/CT incidental detection of second tumor in patients investigated for pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Lucia Moletta; Sergio Bissoli; Alberto Fantin; Nicola Passuello; Michele Valmasoni; Cosimo Sperti
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 6.  Melanoma Radiological Surveillance: A Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Challenges.

Authors:  Matthew David Howard
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2020-03-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.