Literature DB >> 25117588

Practical precautionary resource management using robust optimization.

Richard T Woodward1, David Tomberlin.   

Abstract

Uncertainties inherent in fisheries motivate a precautionary approach to management, meaning an approach specifically intended to avoid bad outcomes. Stochastic dynamic optimization models, which have been in the fisheries literature for decades, provide a framework for decision making when uncertain outcomes have known probabilities. However, most such models incorporate population dynamics models for which the parameters are assumed known. In this paper, we apply a robust optimization approach to capture a form of uncertainty nearly universal in fisheries, uncertainty regarding the values of model parameters. Our approach, developed by Nilim and El Ghaoui (Oper Res 53(5):780-798, 2005), establishes bounds on parameter values based on the available data and the degree of precaution that the decision maker chooses. To demonstrate the applicability of the method to fisheries management problems, we use a simple example, the Skeena River sockeye salmon fishery. We show that robust optimization offers a structured and computationally tractable approach to formulating precautionary harvest policies. Moreover, as better information about the resource becomes available, less conservative management is possible without reducing the level of precaution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25117588     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0348-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Sustainability of fisheries through marine reserves: a robust modeling analysis.

Authors:  L Doyen; C Béné
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Adaptive management of natural resources--framework and issues.

Authors:  Byron K Williams
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches.

Authors:  Robert J Lempert; Myles T Collins
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Panaceas, uncertainty, and the robust control framework in sustainability science.

Authors:  John M Anderies; Armando A Rodriguez; Marco A Janssen; Oguzhan Cifdaloz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Active adaptive management for conservation.

Authors:  Michael A McCarthy; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 6.560

6.  Optimal harvesting with both population and price dynamics.

Authors:  F B Hanson; D Ryan
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.144

7.  Adaptive optimization and the harvest of biological populations.

Authors:  B K Williams
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.144

8.  Learning and adaptation in the management of waterfowl harvests.

Authors:  Fred A Johnson
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 6.789

9.  Confronting socially generated uncertainty in adaptive management.

Authors:  Andrew J Tyre; Sarah Michaels
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.789

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Optimization Control of the Color-Coating Production Process for Model Uncertainty.

Authors:  Dakuo He; Zhengsong Wang; Le Yang; Zhizhong Mao
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10

2.  When optimization for governing human-environment tipping elements is neither sustainable nor safe.

Authors:  Wolfram Barfuss; Jonathan F Donges; Steven J Lade; Jürgen Kurths
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 14.919

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.