Literature DB >> 17650246

Active adaptive management for conservation.

Michael A McCarthy1, Hugh P Possingham.   

Abstract

Active adaptive management balances the requirements of management with the need to learn about the system being managed, which leads to better decisions. It is difficult to judge the benefit of management actions that accelerate information gain, relative to the benefit of making the best management decision given what is known at the time. We present a first step in developing methods to optimize management decisions that incorporate both uncertainty and learning via adaptive management. We assumed a manager can allocate effort to discrete units (e.g., areas for revegetation or animals for reintroduction), the outcome can be measured as success or failure (e.g., the revegetation in an area is successful or the animal survives and breeds), and the manager has two possible management options from which to choose. We further assumed that there is an annual budget that may be allocated to one or both of the two options and that the manager must decide on the allocation. We used Bayesian updating of the probability of success of the two options and stochastic dynamic programming to determine the optimal strategy over a specified number of years. The costs, level of certainty about the success of the two options, and the timeframe of management all influenced the optimal allocation of the annual budget. In addition, the choice of management objective had a large influence on the optimal decision. In a case study of Merri Creek, Melbourne, Australia, we applied the approach to determining revegetation strategies. Our approach can be used to determine how best to manage ecological systems in the face of uncertainty.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17650246     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00677.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  22 in total

1.  A modelling framework for integrating reproduction, survival and count data when projecting the fates of threatened populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Parlato; John G Ewen; Mhairi McCready; Kevin A Parker; Doug P Armstrong
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Application of thresholds of potential concern and limits of acceptable change in the condition assessment of a significant wetland.

Authors:  Kerrylee Rogers; Neil Saintilan; Matthew J Colloff; Li Wen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Practical precautionary resource management using robust optimization.

Authors:  Richard T Woodward; David Tomberlin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in North American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations.

Authors:  R S Miller; S J Sweeney
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Setting expected timelines of fished population recovery for the adaptive management of a marine protected area network.

Authors:  Katherine A Kaplan; Lauren Yamane; Louis W Botsford; Marissa L Baskett; Alan Hastings; Sara Worden; J Wilson White
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 6.105

Review 6.  Contending with uncertainty in conservation management decisions.

Authors:  Michael A McCarthy
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Integrating network ecology with applied conservation: a synthesis and guide to implementation.

Authors:  Christopher N Kaiser-Bunbury; Nico Blüthgen
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.276

8.  Monitoring butterfly abundance: beyond Pollard walks.

Authors:  Jérôme Pellet; Jason T Bried; David Parietti; Antoine Gander; Patrick O Heer; Daniel Cherix; Raphaël Arlettaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Modelling Skylarks (Alauda arvensis) to predict impacts of changes in land management and policy: development and testing of an agent-based model.

Authors:  Christopher J Topping; Peter Odderskær; Johnny Kahlert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Getting the biggest birch for the bang: restoring and expanding upland birchwoods in the Scottish Highlands by managing red deer.

Authors:  Andrew J Tanentzap; James Zou; David A Coomes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.