Literature DB >> 25116938

Preferences for the delivery of community pharmacy services to help manage chronic conditions.

Jennifer A Whitty1, Elizabeth Kendall2, Adem Sav3, Fiona Kelly4, Sara S McMillan3, Michelle A King5, Amanda J Wheeler4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To optimize positive outcomes, the design of new pharmacy services should consider the preferences of consumers with chronic condition(s) and their carers.
OBJECTIVES: (i) To evaluate the relative importance of community pharmacy service characteristics, from the perspective of consumers with chronic condition(s) and carers; (ii) To compare consumer and carer preferences to health professional beliefs about ideal service characteristics for consumers.
METHOD: A discrete choice experiment was completed by consumers with chronic condition(s) and/or carers (n = 602) and health professionals (n = 297), recruited from four regions in Australia. Participants were each randomized to one survey version containing four (from a total 72) different choices between two new pharmacy services. Consumer and carer participants were also given an 'opt out' alternative of current service. Each service was described using six attributes related to pharmacy service characteristics: continued medicines supply, continuity and coordinated care, location, medication management, education and information, and cost.
RESULTS: Consumers and carers placed highest priority on continued medicines supply by a pharmacist for regular and symptom flare up medicines (100 priority points), a pharmacy located within a 'one-stop' health center (61 points) and home delivery of medicines (52 points). Although continued medicines supply was most important for consumers and carers, pharmacy location was perceived by health professionals to be the most important characteristic for consumers. Participants were less inclined to choose new services if their current pharmacy offered high quality services that were person-centered, easy to access and responsive to their needs. Younger, more highly educated and employed participants, and those with established condition(s) were more likely to choose new services.
CONCLUSIONS: Person-centered care is a fundamental tenet for pharmacy services. The provision of continued medicines supply (e.g. through pharmacist prescribing), convenient and coordinated care delivered through a one stop health centre, and home delivery of medicines, should be prioritized when planning pharmacy services to best assist consumers to manage chronic conditions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic disease; Community pharmacy services; Consumer preferences; Discrete choice experiment; Person-centered care; Pharmaceutical economics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25116938     DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Social Adm Pharm        ISSN: 1551-7411


  15 in total

1.  Impacts of a Mail-Order Service for Refilling Prescriptions on Patient Satisfaction and Operational Load at a Comprehensive Cancer Center in Jordan.

Authors:  Rasha S AbuBlan; Wedad Awad; Randa Agha; Neveen Hejawi; Hala Srouji; Suzan Hammoudeh; Lama H Nazer
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-06-11

2.  Treatment Burden and Chronic Illness: Who is at Most Risk?

Authors:  Adem Sav; Jennifer A Whitty; Sara S McMillan; Elizabeth Kendall; Fiona Kelly; Michelle A King; Amanda J Wheeler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Medicine-related services in community pharmacy: public preferences for pharmacy attributes and promotional methods and comparison with pharmacists' perceptions.

Authors:  Shivaun M Gammie; Ruth M Rodgers; Ruey Leng Loo; Sarah A Corlett; Janet Krska
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 2.711

4.  Building intentions with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: the mediating role of knowledge and expectations in implementing new pharmaceutical services in Malaysia.

Authors:  Christine L Tan; Vincent B Gan; Fahad Saleem; Mohamed A Hassali
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2016-12-15

Review 5.  What works for whom in pharmacist-led smoking cessation support: realist review.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Fraser Macfarlane; Liz Steed; Robert Walton
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Jean Spinks; Tracey Bucknall; Georgia Tobiano; Wendy Chaboyer
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Supporting self-management of type 2 diabetes: is there a role for the community pharmacist?

Authors:  Teerapon Dhippayom; Ines Krass
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Development, test-retest reliability and validity of the Pharmacy Value-Added Services Questionnaire (PVASQ).

Authors:  Christine L Tan; Mohamed A Hassali; Fahad Saleem; Asrul A Shafie; Hisham Aljadhey; Vincent B Gan
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2015-06-15

9.  Australian community pharmacy services: a survey of what people with chronic conditions and their carers use versus what they consider important.

Authors:  Sara S McMillan; Fiona Kelly; Adem Sav; Michelle A King; Jennifer A Whitty; Amanda J Wheeler
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Managing Minor Ailments; The Public's Preferences for Attributes of Community Pharmacies. A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Terry Porteous; Mandy Ryan; Christine Bond; Margaret Watson; Verity Watson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.