Literature DB >> 25115325

Is sacral neuromodulation here to stay? Clinical outcomes of a new treatment for fecal incontinence.

Bobby L Johnson1, Adam Abodeely, Martha A Ferguson, Bradley R Davis, Janice F Rafferty, Ian M Paquette.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) was approved by the FDA for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI) in 2011, and previous industry-sponsored trials have shown excellent clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine clinical outcomes of patients treated during our initial experience with SNM.
METHODS: A prospective database of patients treated with SNM for FI by one of three colorectal surgeons at two separate institutions was maintained starting in 2011. Patients showing ≥50% improvement of weekly incontinent episodes during test stimulation were offered permanent implantation of the SNM device. Disease severity was tracked using the Wexner score.
RESULTS: A total of 145 patients received a full system implantation (of 152 who received test stimulation). The median preoperative Wexner score of 14 decreased to 3, 3 months after implantation and persisted to 12 months. At 12 months, 95.2% of patients achieved >50% improvement in Wexner Score and 67.6% achieved >75% improvement. The most common adverse event was infection (3.4%). Three patients (2.1%) required lead revision.
CONCLUSIONS: SNM is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of FI. Postoperative patient surveillance is important, as many patients require programming changes, and some will require a lead revision over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25115325     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2611-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  30 in total

1.  Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  T H Rockwood; J M Church; J W Fleshman; R L Kane; C Mavrantonis; A G Thorson; S D Wexner; D Bliss; A C Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  [Sacral root neuromodulation as treatment for fecal incontinence. Preliminary results].

Authors:  J M Navarro; A Arroyo Sebastián; F Pérez Vicente; A M Sánchez Romero; J Pérez Legaz; P Serrano Paz; A M Fernández Frías; F Candela Polo; R Calpena Rico
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 3.  The influence of sacral nerve stimulation on anorectal dysfunction.

Authors:  E V Carrington; C H Knowles
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Etiology and management of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  J M Jorge; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Joe J Tjandra; Miranda K Y Chan; Chung Hung Yeh; Carolyn Murray-Green
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: external anal sphincter defect vs. intact anal sphincter.

Authors:  Miranda K Y Chan; Joe J Tjandra
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence related to obstetric anal sphincter damage.

Authors:  Michael E D Jarrett; Thomas C Dudding; R John Nicholls; Carolynne J Vaizey; C Richard G Cohen; Michael A Kamm
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Sacral nerve stimulation can improve continence in patients with Crohn's disease with internal and external anal sphincter disruption.

Authors:  Véronique Vitton; Julie Gigout; Jean-Charles Grimaud; Michel Bouvier; Ariadne Desjeux; Pierre Orsoni
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK.

Authors:  M E D Jarrett; J S Varma; G S Duthie; R J Nicholls; M A Kamm
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; John A Coller; Ghislain Devroede; Tracy Hull; Richard McCallum; Miranda Chan; Jennifer M Ayscue; Abbas S Shobeiri; David Margolin; Michael England; Howard Kaufman; William J Snape; Ece Mutlu; Heidi Chua; Paul Pettit; Deborah Nagle; Robert D Madoff; Darin R Lerew; Anders Mellgren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

1.  Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-05-06

2.  Does preoperative anal physiology testing or ultrasonography predict clinical outcome with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence?

Authors:  Yarini Quezada; James L Whiteside; Tracy Rice; Mickey Karram; Janice F Rafferty; Ian M Paquette
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Sacral neuromodulation - when and for who.

Authors:  Marcelo Mass-Lindenbaum; D Calderón-Pollak; H B Goldman; Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 4.  Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Dudding; Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Stefan Engelberg; Maria Paola Bertapelle; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Karel Everaert; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Charles H Knowles; Lilli Lundby; Klaus E Matzel; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos; Mona B Rydningen; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.