Literature DB >> 25114833

Targeting COX-2 abrogates mammary tumorigenesis: Breaking cancer-associated suppression of immunosurveillance.

Nune Markosyan1, Edward P Chen1, Emer M Smyth1.   

Abstract

Three studies addressed the role of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in mammary tumorigenesis using epithelial and macrophage COX-2 knockout mice. Deletion of COX-2 in either cell restored, at least partially, tumor immunosurveillance either by changing macrophage function to offset pro-tumor effects, or by attracting more cytotoxic T lymphocytes and natural killer cells to the tumor. These studies suggest benefits from targeted COX-2 selective inhibition in combination with immunotherapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; cyclooxygenase-2; microenvironment; targeted therapy; tumor immune function

Year:  2014        PMID: 25114833      PMCID: PMC4126836          DOI: 10.4161/onci.29287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


Epidemiological studies and clinical trials show therapeutic protection against cancers of the colon, prostate, lung, breast, and other tissues afforded by long-term use of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitors, the ‘coxibs.’ These findings have been recapitulated across COX-2 deficient cancer mouse models, with suppressed COX-2-derived prostaglandin E2, a dominant pro-inflammatory mediator that also promotes proliferation and angiogenesis while suppressing apoptosis and immune function, identified as the principal anticancer event. However, emergence of significant cardiovascular risks, arising from collateral suppression of the cardioprotective endothelial COX-2 derived mediator prostacyclin, have raised doubts about the benefits of systemic COX-2 inhibition. We engineered mice lacking COX-2 selectively in distinct cellular compartments—mammary epithelium (COX-2 KOepi) or myeloid cells (COX-2 KOmyeloid)—to delineate the role of COX-2 in mammary tumorigenesis and to determine the protective effects of cell-specific COX-2 inhibition, thus avoiding systemic cardiovascular side-effects.- In COX-2 KOepi mice mammary tumor onset, induced either by the carcinogen DMBA or transgenic expression of an activated HER2/neu oncogene, was delayed., Although qualitatively and quantitatively different, in both models significant changes were evident in the tumor microenvironment involving tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), which are essential to immune destruction of tumor cells. In the DMBA model, the dominant effect of epithelial COX-2 deletion was augmented TAM, a counterintuitive finding since TAM are typically of the M2 phenotype that promotes tumor growth by mechanisms that include suppression of innate and adaptive anti-tumor immunity. However, phenotypic marker and cytokine analysis revealed that COX-2 KOepi mammary TAM were skewed toward the M1 phenotype that supports type 1 anti-tumorigenic CD4+ T helper type 1 lymphocytes (Th1). Concordantly, increased CD4+, and correlation between M1-TAM and Th1 markers, was detected in DMBA-induced COX-2 KOepi mammary tumors. In addition, natural killer (NK) cell markers were increased in COX-2 KOepi tumors, further supporting a paracrine influence of epithelial cell COX-2 to suppress anti-tumor immune function. In the HER2/neu model, which more closely resembles human disease, the phenotype was more profound – COX-2 KOepi tumor onset was delayed, and multiplicity reduced, co-incident with decreased cell proliferation, suppressed angiogenesis, and a shift toward increased infiltrating CD3+CD4+ (likely Th1), CD3+CD8+ (cytotoxic T-lymphocytes or CTL), and CD3- CD8+ (likely NK) immune cells. Mechanistically, this shift toward anti-tumor immune function appeared related not to TAM function but rather to modified COX-2 KO tumor cell function to produce more of the lymphocyte chemo-attractant CXCL-9 and less of the lymphocyte co-inhibitory molecule PD-L1. This novel link between COX-2 and PD-L1 function was confirmed when lower PD-L1 expression was observed in HER2/neu transformed mammary tumor cells transduced with shRNA to knock down (KD) COX-2. Moreover, COX-2 KD cells failed to grow orthotopic tumors in wild type mouse fat pads. The critical role of CD8+ cells was apparent when CD8+ cell depletion in wild type mice restored COX-2 KD tumor growth to the level seen with normal tumor cells. Together these studies indicated a significant role for tumor cell COX-2 in tumor immune suppression. Given the central role of TAM in the tumor immune microenvironment, and the central function of COX-2 in inflammatory macrophages, we developed HER2/neu transgenic mice lacking COX-2 in macrophages, as well as other myeloid cells (COX-2 KOmyeloid). Significant suppression of mammary tumor onset, multiplicity and growth was evident. Importantly, orthotopic tumor growth of normal mammary tumor cells was dramatically reduced in COX-2 KOmyeloid hosts compared with wild type, underscoring the significant pro-tumor role of myeloid/macrophage COX-2. Similar to the COX-2 KOepi model, increased CD4+ and CD8+ TIL were evident in COX-2 KOmyeloid tumors. This appeared secondary to reduced TAM-mediated T-cell suppression that was driven by impaired colony stimulating factor-1-dependent migration of COX-2 KO macrophages to tumors, as well as restrained differentiation to the immune-suppressive M2 TAM phenotype. Host depletion of CD8+, but not CD4+, cells restored orthotopic tumor growth in COX-2 KOmyeloid mice, again underscoring the contribution of COX-2 to suppressing the crucial anti-tumor role of CD8+ cells. Immunosurveillance by CD8+ CTL and NK cells has emerged as critical for controlling nascent in situ tumor growth. This has led to a wave of promising new therapeutic strategies, including blockade of immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4, PD-L1, and its receptor PD-1, or adoptive transfer of anti-tumor T lymphocytes, with significant and durable clinical responses reported in trials., While the efficiency of COX-2 inhibition in promoting cytotoxic immune function should be verified in human breast and other cancers, our mouse studies implicate COX-2 in the ‘broken’ immune-surveillance that allows for mammary tumor progression (Fig. 1), and demonstrate that, rather than the hazardous systemic inhibition, targeted cell-specific COX-2 inhibition is sufficient to achieve the benefit. These studies open possibilities for combination of COX-2 inhibitors to potentiate the clinical effect of checkpoint blockade or adoptive T-cell transfer. Remarkably, our studies show that targeted inhibition of COX-2 in macrophages, a component of the complex tumor microenvironment, produced substantial antitumor immune function and suppressed tumor growth, revealing opportunities to combine targeted delivery of COX-2 selective inhibitors directly to macrophages. One approach is to incorporate coxibs into HDL nanoparticles, which are readily engulfed by macrophages, to achieve the tumor suppressive effect of systemic COX-2 inhibition but without thromboembolic risk, because COX-2 function in healthy vascular endothelium is spared. With such targeted strategies, the promise of COX-2 inhibitors in cancer prevention and therapy, which was all but lost to the cardiovascular risk of systemic inhibition, may be renewed and realized.

Figure 1. Cell-specific role of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in suppression of antitumor immune function. COX-2 in both tumor cells and macrophages may contribute to suppressed CTL function in mammary tumors. Tumor cell COX-2 may reduce expression of the T-cell attractant CXCL9, and enhance the lymphocyte co-inhibitory molecule PD-L1, thereby limiting lymphocyte infiltration and cytotoxic function. In addition, tumor cell COX-2 may skew macrophage polarization, limiting the antitumor pro-immune M1, and enhancing the pro-tumor immunosuppressive M2, phenotype. Macrophage COX-2 promotes CSF-1-dependent macrophage migration toward tumor cells as well as M2 polarization, thereby limiting the number and function of CTLs in tumors. TC = Tumor cell; mac = macrophage, M1 and M2 type; CTL = cytotoxic T cell; Th1 = helper T cell, type 1; NK = natural killer cell; CSF-1 = colony stimulating factor-1; CSF-1R = CSF-1 receptor; PGE2 = Prostaglandin E2; PD-L1 = programmed death-ligand 1.

Figure 1. Cell-specific role of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in suppression of antitumor immune function. COX-2 in both tumor cells and macrophages may contribute to suppressed CTL function in mammary tumors. Tumor cell COX-2 may reduce expression of the T-cell attractant CXCL9, and enhance the lymphocyte co-inhibitory molecule PD-L1, thereby limiting lymphocyte infiltration and cytotoxic function. In addition, tumor cell COX-2 may skew macrophage polarization, limiting the antitumor pro-immune M1, and enhancing the pro-tumor immunosuppressive M2, phenotype. Macrophage COX-2 promotes CSF-1-dependent macrophage migration toward tumor cells as well as M2 polarization, thereby limiting the number and function of CTLs in tumors. TC = Tumor cell; mac = macrophage, M1 and M2 type; CTL = cytotoxic T cell; Th1 = helper T cell, type 1; NK = natural killer cell; CSF-1 = colony stimulating factor-1; CSF-1R = CSF-1 receptor; PGE2 = Prostaglandin E2; PD-L1 = programmed death-ligand 1.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Differential macrophage programming in the tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Brian Ruffell; Nesrine I Affara; Lisa M Coussens
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 2.  Antibody-modified T cells: CARs take the front seat for hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Marcela V Maus; Stephan A Grupp; David L Porter; Carl H June
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Vascular COX-2 modulates blood pressure and thrombosis in mice.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Emanuela Ricciotti; Rosario Scalia; Soon Yew Tang; Gregory Grant; Zhou Yu; Gavin Landesberg; Irene Crichton; Weichen Wu; Ellen Puré; Colin D Funk; Garret A FitzGerald
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 4.  Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate anti-tumor immunity.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 7.486

5.  Deletion of cyclooxygenase 2 in mouse mammary epithelial cells delays breast cancer onset through augmentation of type 1 immune responses in tumors.

Authors:  Nune Markosyan; Edward P Chen; Victoire N Ndong; Yubing Yao; Christopher J Sterner; Lewis A Chodosh; John A Lawson; Garret A Fitzgerald; Emer M Smyth
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 6.  Eicosanoids and cancer.

Authors:  Dingzhi Wang; Raymond N Dubois
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Cyclooxygenase-2 (cox-2) blockade in the chemoprevention of cancers of the colon, breast, prostate, and lung.

Authors:  R E Harris
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.473

8.  Myeloid Cell COX-2 deletion reduces mammary tumor growth through enhanced cytotoxic T-lymphocyte function.

Authors:  Edward P Chen; Nune Markosyan; Emma Connolly; John A Lawson; Xuanwen Li; Gregory R Grant; Tilo Grosser; Garret A FitzGerald; Emer M Smyth
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Mammary carcinoma cell derived cyclooxygenase 2 suppresses tumor immune surveillance by enhancing intratumoral immune checkpoint activity.

Authors:  Nune Markosyan; Edward P Chen; Rebecca A Evans; Victoire Ndong; Robert H Vonderheide; Emer M Smyth
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  A statin-loaded reconstituted high-density lipoprotein nanoparticle inhibits atherosclerotic plaque inflammation.

Authors:  Raphaël Duivenvoorden; Jun Tang; David P Cormode; Aneta J Mieszawska; David Izquierdo-Garcia; Canturk Ozcan; Maarten J Otten; Neeha Zaidi; Mark E Lobatto; Sarian M van Rijs; Bram Priem; Emma L Kuan; Catherine Martel; Bernd Hewing; Hendrik Sager; Matthias Nahrendorf; Gwendalyn J Randolph; Erik S G Stroes; Valentin Fuster; Edward A Fisher; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Tumor cell-intrinsic EPHA2 suppresses anti-tumor immunity by regulating PTGS2 (COX-2).

Authors:  Nune Markosyan; Jinyang Li; Yu H Sun; Lee P Richman; Jeffrey H Lin; Fangxue Yan; Liz Quinones; Yogev Sela; Taiji Yamazoe; Naomi Gordon; John W Tobias; Katelyn T Byrne; Andrew J Rech; Garret A FitzGerald; Ben Z Stanger; Robert H Vonderheide
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) mediates resistance to apoptosis induced in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Kanae Bekki; Helena Vogel; Wen Li; Tomohiro Ito; Colleen Sweeney; Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann; Fumio Matsumura; Christoph F A Vogel
Journal:  Pestic Biochem Physiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  Multi-Omics Approach Points to the Importance of Oxylipins Metabolism in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Dmitry V Chistyakov; Mariia V Guryleva; Elena S Stepanova; Lyubov M Makarenkova; Elena V Ptitsyna; Sergei V Goriainov; Arina I Nikolskaya; Alina A Astakhova; Anna S Klimenko; Olga A Bezborodova; Elena A Rasskazova; Olga G Potanina; Rimma A Abramovich; Elena R Nemtsova; Marina G Sergeeva
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  A Comparative Approach of Tumor-Associated Inflammation in Mammary Cancer between Humans and Dogs.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Carvalho; Ricardo Silva-Carvalho; Isabel Pires; Justina Prada; Rodolfo Bianchini; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Felisbina L Queiroga
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 on Intermittent Hypoxia-Induced Lung Tumor Malignancy in a Mouse Model of Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Noelia Campillo; Marta Torres; Antoni Vilaseca; Paula Naomi Nonaka; David Gozal; Jordi Roca-Ferrer; César Picado; Josep Maria Montserrat; Ramon Farré; Daniel Navajas; Isaac Almendros
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Immuno-Oncology: Emerging Targets and Combination Therapies.

Authors:  Henry T Marshall; Mustafa B A Djamgoz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Combinatorial Approaches With Checkpoint Inhibitors to Enhance Anti-tumor Immunity.

Authors:  Barbara Seliger
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Investigation of the Role of PUFA Metabolism in Breast Cancer Using a Rank-Based Random Forest Algorithm.

Authors:  Mariia V Guryleva; Dmitry D Penzar; Dmitry V Chistyakov; Andrey A Mironov; Alexander V Favorov; Marina G Sergeeva
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Endogenous CXCL9 affects prognosis by regulating tumor-infiltrating natural killer cells in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yasunari Fukuda; Tadafumi Asaoka; Hidetoshi Eguchi; Yuki Yokota; Masahiko Kubo; Mitsuru Kinoshita; Shinya Urakawa; Yoshifumi Iwagami; Yoshito Tomimaru; Hirofumi Akita; Takehiro Noda; Kunihito Gotoh; Shogo Kobayashi; Michinari Hirata; Hisashi Wada; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 10.  Determinants of Resistance to Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Linda Tran; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 6.208

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.