| Literature DB >> 25114743 |
Gabriel R Neto1, Heleodório H Santos2, Juliana B C Sousa3, Adenilson T A Júnior4, Joamira P Araújo3, Rodrigo R Aniceto5, Maria S C Sousa3.
Abstract
Strength training combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) have been used to improve the levels of muscle adaptation. The aim of this paper was to investigate the acute effect of high intensity squats with and without blood flow restriction on muscular fatigue levels. Twelve athletes (aged 25.95 ± 0.84 years) were randomized into two groups: without Blood Flow Restriction (NFR, n = 6) and With Blood Flow Restriction (WFR, n = 6) that performed a series of free weight squats with 80% 1-RM until concentric failure. The strength of the quadriceps extensors was assessed in a maximum voluntary isometric contraction integrated to signals from the surface electromyogram. The average frequency showed significant reductions in the WFR group for the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles, and intergroup only for the vastus medialis. In conclusion, a set of squats at high intensity with BFR could compromise muscle strength immediately after exercise, however, differences were not significant between groups.Entities:
Keywords: athletes; quadriceps; resistance training; vascular occlusion
Year: 2014 PMID: 25114743 PMCID: PMC4120450 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Values obtained in the pre vs post-exercise and between groups for the variable workload
| Variable/Group | NFR (n=6) | WFR (n=6) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | |
| Isometric Torque (Kgf) | 92.97±1.99 | 75.35±2.47[ | 93.13±7.37 | 69.88±3.53[ |
| Fmed RF (Hz) | 152.66±8.81 | 163.73±8.53 | 160.55±4.71 | 161.13±5.44 |
| Fmed VL (Hz) | 167.96±5.32 | 165.36±5.24 | 157.22±4.41 | 145.18±7.52[ |
| Fmed VM (Hz) | 175.46±16.75 | 175.78±15.31 | 137.04±6.43 | 128.57±8.36[ |
| RF (%PeaksEMG) | 21.30±0.01 | 20.62±0.01 | 21.64±0.01 | 21.34±0.01 |
| VL (%PeaksEMG) | 18.15±0.01 | 17.10±0.10 | 24.80±0.20 | 21.23±0.15[ |
| VM(%PeaksEMG) | 13,54±0,04 | 15.16±0.33 | 21.55±0.13 | 21.00±0.11 |
Significant difference (p < 0.05) compared to the pre-exercise (intragroup).
Kgf - Kilogram Force; Hz - Hertz;% PeaksEMG - Standardization thought the sEMG signal peak; NFR = without Blood Flow Restriction; WFR = With Blood Flow Restriction; RF - Rectus femoris, VL - Vastus lateralis; VM - Vastus Medialis
Figure 1Percentage changes in maximum isometric torque (pre × post-exercise) for WFR and NFR groups NFR = without Blood Flow Restriction; WFR = With Blood Flow Restriction Average values and standard error
Figure 2Percentage of changes in median frequency (MF) in a MVIC for knee′s three extensor muscles Average values and standard error
*Significant difference between groups (p < 0.05); Average values and standard error, NFR = without Blood Flow Restriction; WFR = With Blood Flow Restriction; RF - Rectus femoris; VL - Vastus lateralis; VM - Vastus Medialis
Figure 3Percentage change in the sEMG amplitude in a MVIC for knee′s three extensor muscles NFR = without Blood Flow Restriction; WFR = With Blood Flow Restriction; RF - Rectus femoris; VL - Vastus lateralis; VM - Vastus Medialis; Average values and standard error