Literature DB >> 25114460

Role of frozen section in intraoperative assessment of ovarian masses: a tertiary oncology center experience.

Renu Sukumaran1, Thara Somanathan1, Anitha Mathews1, Jayasree Kattor1, Suchetha Sambasivan2, Rema Prabhakaran Nair2.   

Abstract

Surgical management of ovarian lesions vary considerably depending on the nature of the lesion. As the preoperative imaging and serum tumor marker levels are of limited value in the proper categorization of ovarian lesions, intraoperative pathological assessment is commonly requested for a primary diagnosis. Aim of the study is to assess the accuracy of the frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian masses in our center and to analyze the causes of diagnostic discrepancies. In this retrospective study, frozen section diagnosis of 233 cases of ovarian masses was compared with the permanent section diagnosis. The overall accuracy of frozen section was 91.85 %. The sensitivity of frozen section diagnosis for benign, borderline and malignant tumors was 99.2, 88.46 and 82.95 % respectively. The corresponding specificity was 96.5, 93.23 and 99.3 %. There were 19 discordant cases including 18 false negative cases and one false positive case. Frozen section is an important diagnostic tool to determine the nature of ovarian masses. Careful macroscopic examination, evaluation of multiple sections along with clinical and radiological findings helps to reduce false positive and false negative results. Frozen section examination has limitations especially in cases of borderline tumors. This modality is most effective when the pathologist and surgeon are aware of the advantages and limitations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frozen section; Intraoperative assessment; Ovarian neoplasm

Year:  2014        PMID: 25114460      PMCID: PMC4116551          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-014-0311-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  16 in total

1.  Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in ovarian masses: experience at a tertiary oncology center.

Authors:  Azadeh Rakhshan; Hanieh Zham; Mehdi Kazempour
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a 5-year review with assessment of discrepant diagnostic cases.

Authors:  Colin J R Stewart; Barbara A Brennan; Ian G Hammond; Yee C Leung; Anthony J McCartney
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.762

3.  How accurate is intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors?

Authors:  Renuka Malipatil; Julian A Crasta
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Diagnostic efficacy of tumor markers, sonography, and intraoperative frozen section for ovarian tumors.

Authors:  F Wakahara; F Kikkawa; A Nawa; K Tamakoshi; K Ino; O Maeda; M Kawai; S Mizutani
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 5.  Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a systematic quantitative review.

Authors:  L R Medeiros; D D Rosa; M I Edelweiss; A T Stein; M C Bozzetti; A Zelmanowicz; P R Pohlmann; L Meurer; M T Carballo
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 6.  Surgery for borderline tumor of the ovary.

Authors:  C G Tropé; G Kristensen; A Makar
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug

7.  Accuracy of frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian mass.

Authors:  S Tangjitgamol; S Jesadapatrakul; S Manusirivithaya; C Sheanakul
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 8.  A practical approach to intraoperative consultation in gynecological pathology.

Authors:  Patricia Baker; Esther Oliva
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.762

9.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Fariba Yarandi; Z Eftekhar; Narges Izadi-Mood; Hadi Shojaei
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.100

Review 10.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis in borderline tumors of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 96 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Clemens B Tempfer; Stephan Polterauer; Eva-Katrin Bentz; Alexander Reinthaller; Lukas A Hefler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.482

View more
  5 in total

1.  The usefulness of intraoperative consultation for the diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Rosa A Salcedo-Hernández; David F Cantú-de-León; Delia Pérez-Montiel; Leticia García-Pérez; Leonardo S Lino-Silva; César Zepeda-Najar; Salim A Barquet-Muñoz
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-02

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section analysis of borderline ovarian tumors: a meta-analysis with emphasis on misdiagnosis factors.

Authors:  Zhen Huang; Li Li; ChengCheng Li; Samuel Ngaujah; Shu Yao; Ran Chu; Lin Xie; XingSheng Yang; Xiangning Zhang; Peishu Liu; Jie Jiang; Youzhong Zhang; Baoxia Cui; Kun Song; Beihua Kong
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 3.  Intraoperative frozen section analysis for the diagnosis of early stage ovarian cancer in suspicious pelvic masses.

Authors:  Nithya D G Ratnavelu; Andrew P Brown; Susan Mallett; Rob J P M Scholten; Amit Patel; Christina Founta; Khadra Galaal; Paul Cross; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section for the evaluation of ovarian neoplasms: an institutional experience.

Authors:  Atif Ali Hashmi; Samreen Naz; Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi; Naveen Faridi; Syed Danish Hussain; Shazia Mumtaz; Mehmood Khan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Role of Frozen Section in Surgical Management of Ovarian Neoplasm.

Authors:  Saphina Palakkan; Tony Augestine; M K Valsan; K P Abdul Vahab; Lekha K Nair
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2020-01-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.