Literature DB >> 25111628

Pigeon (Columba livia) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) performance in the midsession reversal procedure depends upon cue dimensionality.

Neil McMillan1, Chelsea R Kirk1, William A Roberts1.   

Abstract

Pigeons (Columba livia) produce many anticipatory and perseverative errors on discrimination tasks with a reversal of reward contingencies partway through the session. Prior comparative research has suggested that rats (Rattus norvegicus) do not show the same number of errors and produce results that more closely resemble those of humans. We examined pigeons' performance on a visual-spatial discrimination with the reversal point randomized within the session and found that they showed remarkably few errors. When these subjects were split into groups with the contingencies for reward unconfounded, the birds in the spatial-contingency group maintained their performance, and those in the visual-contingency group made many more anticipatory and perseverative errors. We also examined the performance of naïve pigeons on a spatial midsession reversal task and found a pattern of results similar to those shown by pigeons that had previously been trained on a visual-spatial reversal procedure. Finally, we studied rats on a T-maze using a spatial-discrimination midsession reversal task and found that the rats showed a large number of anticipatory and perseverative errors. Near-perfect performance on the midsession reversal task appears to be subject to the ability of the animal to orient spatially during the intertrial interval, rather than being due to broad species differences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25111628     DOI: 10.1037/a0036562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  7 in total

1.  Midsession shifts in reward probability and the control of behavioral variability.

Authors:  W David Stahlman; Kenneth J Leising
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Rats' midsession reversal performance: the nature of the response.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Kristina F Pattison; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  The Organization of Behavior Over Time: Insights from Mid-Session Reversal.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2016

4.  Fractionating choice: A study on reward discrimination, preference, and relative valuation in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Joshua M Ricker; Justin D Hatch; Daniel D Powers; Howard Casey Cromwell
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Assessing human performance during contingency changes and extinction tests in reversal-learning tasks.

Authors:  Carolyn M Ritchey; Shawn P Gilroy; Toshikazu Kuroda; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Temporal dynamics of task switching and abstract-concept learning in pigeons.

Authors:  Thomas A Daniel; Robert G Cook; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-02

7.  Kea (Nestor notabilis) show flexibility and individuality in within-session reversal learning tasks.

Authors:  Monika Laschober; Roger Mundry; Ludwig Huber; Raoul Schwing
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.084

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.