Literature DB >> 25110923

Scope of physician procedures independently billed by mid-level providers in the office setting.

Brett Coldiron1, Mondhipa Ratnarathorn2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Mid-level providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) were originally envisioned to provide primary care services in underserved areas. This study details the current scope of independent procedural billing to Medicare of difficult, invasive, and surgical procedures by medical mid-level providers.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the scope of independent billing to Medicare for procedures performed by mid-level providers in an outpatient office setting for a calendar year.
DESIGN: Analyses of the 2012 Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master File, which reflects fee-for-service claims that were paid by Medicare, for Current Procedural Terminology procedures independently billed by mid-level providers. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Outpatient office setting among health care providers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The scope of independent billing to Medicare for procedures performed by mid-level providers.
RESULTS: In 2012, nurse practitioners and physician assistants billed independently for more than 4 million procedures at our cutoff of 5000 paid claims per procedure. Most (54.8%) of these procedures were performed in the specialty area of dermatology. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this study are relevant to safety and quality of care. Recently, the shortage of primary care clinicians has prompted discussion of widening the scope of practice for mid-level providers. It would be prudent to temper widening the scope of practice of mid-level providers by recognizing that mid-level providers are not solely limited to primary care, and may involve procedures for which they may not have formal training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25110923     DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  6 in total

1.  Geographic Distribution of Nonphysician Clinicians Who Independently Billed Medicare for Common Dermatologic Services in 2014.

Authors:  Adewole S Adamson; Elizabeth A Suarez; Philip McDaniel; Paul A Leiphart; Alana Zeitany; Joslyn S Kirby
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Surgery: The Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Blaine T Manning; Daniel D Bohl; Michael L Redondo; Tad L Gerlinger; Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky; Brett R Levine
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2019

3.  Use and Cost of Actinic Keratosis Destruction in the Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service Population, 2007 to 2015.

Authors:  Howa Yeung; Marissa L Baranowski; Robert A Swerlick; Suephy C Chen; Jennifer Hemingway; Danny R Hughes; Richard Duszak
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Trends and Scope of Dermatology Procedures Billed by Advanced Practice Professionals From 2012 Through 2015.

Authors:  Myron Zhang; Jonathan Zippin; Benjamin Kaffenberger
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 10.282

5.  Accuracy of Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Physician Assistants Compared With Dermatologists in a Large Health Care System.

Authors:  Alyce M Anderson; Martha Matsumoto; Melissa I Saul; Aaron M Secrest; Laura K Ferris
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 10.282

6.  Patient Perspectives of Midlevel Providers in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine.

Authors:  Blaine T Manning; Daniel D Bohl; Charles P Hannon; Michael L Redondo; David R Christian; Brian Forsythe; Shane J Nho; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-04-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.