Literature DB >> 30326488

Use and Cost of Actinic Keratosis Destruction in the Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service Population, 2007 to 2015.

Howa Yeung1, Marissa L Baranowski1, Robert A Swerlick1,2, Suephy C Chen1,2, Jennifer Hemingway3, Danny R Hughes3,4, Richard Duszak5.   

Abstract

Importance: Actinic keratosis is prevalent and has the potential to progress to keratinocyte carcinoma. Changes in the use and costs of actinic keratosis treatment are not well understood in the aging population. Objective: To evaluate trends in the use and costs of actinic keratosis destruction in Medicare patients. Design, Setting, and Participants: A billing claims analysis was performed of the Medicare Part B Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files and National Summary Data of premalignant skin lesion destructions performed from 2007 to 2015 among Medicare Part B fee-for-service beneficiaries. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mean number of actinic keratosis lesions destroyed and associated treatment payments in 2015 US dollars estimated per 1000 Medicare Part B fee-for-service beneficiaries. Data analysis was performed from November 2017 to July 2018.
Results: More than 35.6 million actinic keratosis lesions were treated in 2015, increasing from 29.7 million in 2007. Treated actinic keratosis lesions per 1000 beneficiaries increased from 917 in 2007 to 1051 in 2015, while mean inflation-adjusted payments per 1000 patients decreased from $11 749 to $10 942 owing to reimbursement cuts. The proportion of actinic keratosis lesions treated by independently billing nurse practitioners and physician assistants increased from 4.0% in 2007 to 13.5% in 2015. Conclusions and Relevance: This study's findings suggest that actinic keratosis imposes continuously increasing levels of treatment burden in the Medicare fee-for-service population. Reimbursement decreases have been used to control rising costs of actinic keratosis treatment. Critical research may be warranted to optimize access to actinic keratosis treatment and value for prevention of keratinocyte carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30326488      PMCID: PMC6248125          DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  38 in total

1.  The burden of skin disease in the United States.

Authors:  Henry W Lim; Scott A B Collins; Jack S Resneck; Jean L Bolognia; Julie A Hodge; Thomas A Rohrer; Marta J Van Beek; David J Margolis; Arthur J Sober; Martin A Weinstock; David R Nerenz; Wendy Smith Begolka; Jose V Moyano
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  5-Fluorouracil for Actinic Keratosis Treatment and Chemoprevention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joanna L Walker; Julia A Siegel; Moniyka Sachar; Hyemin Pomerantz; Suephy C Chen; Susan M Swetter; Robert P Dellavalle; George P Stricklin; Abrar A Qureshi; John J DiGiovanna; Martin A Weinstock
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Geographic Distribution of Nonphysician Clinicians Who Independently Billed Medicare for Common Dermatologic Services in 2014.

Authors:  Adewole S Adamson; Elizabeth A Suarez; Philip McDaniel; Paul A Leiphart; Alana Zeitany; Joslyn S Kirby
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Trends in Medicare spending on topical immunomodulators and chemotherapies.

Authors:  Hannah Song; Adewole S Adamson; Arash Mostaghimi
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Variation in the Cost of Managing Actinic Keratosis.

Authors:  Joslyn S Kirby; Tanner Gregory; Guodong Liu; Douglas L Leslie; Jeffrey J Miller
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 6.  Current perspective on actinic keratosis: a review.

Authors:  J A Siegel; K Korgavkar; M A Weinstock
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Top dermatologic diagnoses by age.

Authors:  Erin T Landis; Scott A Davis; Arash Taheri; Steven R Feldman
Journal:  Dermatol Online J       Date:  2014-04-16

8.  Quality of life in the actinic neoplasia syndrome: The VA Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention (VATTC) Trial.

Authors:  Martin A Weinstock; Kachiu C Lee; Mary-Margaret Chren; Kimberly Marcolivio
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 9.  Actinic Keratosis Clinical Practice Guidelines: An Appraisal of Quality.

Authors:  Joslyn S Kirby; Thomas Scharnitz; Elizabeth V Seiverling; Hadjh Ahrns; Sara Ferguson
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-16

10.  Patient-reported health outcomes in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis: results from a large-scale observational study analysing effects of diagnoses and disease progression.

Authors:  W G Philipp-Dormston; K Müller; B Novak; K Strömer; C Termeer; U Hammann; J W Glutsch; G Krähn-Senftleben; H Lübbert; M Koller; R M Szeimies
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 6.166

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Environmental effects of stratospheric ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, update 2019.

Authors:  G H Bernhard; R E Neale; P W Barnes; P J Neale; R G Zepp; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; A F Bais; R L McKenzie; P J Aucamp; P J Young; J B Liley; R M Lucas; S Yazar; L E Rhodes; S N Byrne; L M Hollestein; C M Olsen; A R Young; T M Robson; J F Bornman; M A K Jansen; S A Robinson; C L Ballaré; C E Williamson; K C Rose; A T Banaszak; D -P Häder; S Hylander; S -Å Wängberg; A T Austin; W -C Hou; N D Paul; S Madronich; B Sulzberger; K R Solomon; H Li; T Schikowski; J Longstreth; K K Pandey; A M Heikkilä; C C White
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Single Ablative Fractional Resurfacing Laser Treatment For Forearm Actinic Keratoses: 6-Month Follow-Up Data From An Intrapatient Comparison Between Treated and Untreated Sites.

Authors:  Roy Chen; Jeffrey J Wargo; Amy Williams; Elizabeth Cates; Dan F Spandau; Christina Knisely; Jeffrey B Travers
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  Validation of actinic keratosis diagnosis and treatment codes among veterans living with HIV.

Authors:  Krittin J Supapannachart; Chase W Kwon; Sokol Tushe; Jodie L Guest; Suephy C Chen; Howa Yeung
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.732

4.  Approaches to Field Therapy for Actinic Keratoses: Relating Clinical Trial Results to Real-world Practice-A Commentary.

Authors:  David M Pariser
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2022-04

5.  The validity of diagnostic and treatment codes for actinic keratosis in electronic health records.

Authors:  O G Cohen; D J Margolis; M R Wehner
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  Updates on Treatment Approaches for Cutaneous Field Cancerization.

Authors:  Alisen Huang; Julie K Nguyen; Evan Austin; Andrew Mamalis; Jared Jagdeo
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2019-07-19

7.  Randomized controlled trial of fractionated laser resurfacing on aged skin as prophylaxis against actinic neoplasia.

Authors:  Dan F Spandau; Roy Chen; Jeffrey J Wargo; Craig A Rohan; David Southern; Angela Zhang; Mathew Loesch; Jonathan Weyerbacher; Sunil S Tholpady; Davina A Lewis; Matthew Kuhar; Kenneth Y Tsai; Amber J Castellanos; Michael G Kemp; Michael Markey; Elizabeth Cates; Amy R Williams; Christina Knisely; Sabina Bashir; Ryan Gabbard; Robert Hoopes; Jeffrey B Travers
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Trends in Patch Testing in the Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service Population.

Authors:  Adarsh Ravishankar; Rebecca L Freese; Helen M Parsons; Erin M Warshaw; Noah Goldfarb
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 4.867

9.  Prevention versus early detection for long-term control of melanoma and keratinocyte carcinomas: a cost-effectiveness modelling study.

Authors:  Louisa Gordon; Catherine Olsen; David C Whiteman; Thomas M Elliott; Monika Janda; Adele Green
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Spontaneous regression rates of actinic keratosis: a systematic review and pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Theresa Steeb; Anne Petzold; Annkathrin Hornung; Anja Wessely; Carola Berking; Markus V Heppt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.