Literature DB >> 25109921

Molecular diagnostics clinical utility strategy: a six-part framework.

Felix W Frueh1, Bruce Quinn.   

Abstract

The clinical utility of a molecular test rises proportional to a favorable regulatory risk/benefit assessment, and clinical utility is the driver of payer coverage decisions. Although a great deal has been written about clinical utility, debates still center on its 'definition.' We argue that the definition (an impact on clinical outcomes) is self-evident, and improved communications should focus on sequential steps in building and proving an adequate level of confidence for the diagnostic test's clinical value proposition. We propose a six-part framework to facilitate communications between test developers and health technology evaluators, relevant to both regulatory and payer decisions.

Keywords:  clinical utility; combination diagnostics; guidelines; health technology assessment; molecular diagnostics; payers; regulatory approval

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25109921     DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2014.933075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  2 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based medicine and big genomic data.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.150

2.  How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Erica Pitini; Corrado De Vito; Carolina Marzuillo; Elvira D'Andrea; Annalisa Rosso; Antonio Federici; Emilio Di Maria; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.