Literature DB >> 25109621

Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography increases diagnostic accuracy for soft tissue tumors.

Naoto Oebisu1, Manabu Hoshi1, Makoto Ieguchi1, Jun Takada1, Tadashi Iwai1, Masahiko Ohsawa2, Hiroaki Nakamura1.   

Abstract

Resolution of ultrasonography (US) has undergone marked development. Additionally, a new-generation contrast medium (Sonazoid) used for US is newly available. Contrast-enhanced US has been widely used for evaluating several types of cancer. In the present study, we evaluated the ability of color Doppler US (CDUS) and Sonazoid to differentiate between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. A total of 180 patients (87 male, 93 female) were enrolled in the present study. The patient ages ranged from 1 to 91 years (mean 58.1±20.0 years). The maximum size, depth, tumor margins, shape, echogenicity and textural pattern were measured on gray-scale images. CDUS was used to evaluate the intratumoral blood flow with and without Sonazoid. Peak systolic flow velocity (Vp), mean flow velocity (Vm), resistivity index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) of each detected intratumoral artery were automatically calculated with power Doppler US (PDUS). The present study included 118 benign and 62 malignant tumors. Statistical significances were found in size, depth, tumor margin and textural pattern but not in shape or echogenicity on gray-scale images. Before Sonazoid injection, CDUS findings showed 55% sensitivity, 77% specificity and 69% accuracy, whereas contrast-enhanced CDUS showed 87% sensitivity, 68% specificity and 74% accuracy. There were no statistically significant differences between malignant and benign tumors regarding the mean Vp, Vm, RI and PI values determined on PDUS. In conclusion, contrast-enhanced CDUS proved to be a reliable diagnostic tool for detecting malignant potential in soft tissue tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25109621     DOI: 10.3892/or.2014.3378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1021-335X            Impact factor:   3.906


  11 in total

1.  Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors utilizing ultrasound parameters.

Authors:  Takeshi Morii; Tomonori Kishino; Naoko Shimamori; Mitsue Motohashi; Hiroaki Ohnishi; Keita Honya; Takayuki Aoyagi; Takashi Tajima; Shoichi Ichimura
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.314

2.  Utility of a gel stand-off pad in the detection of Doppler signal on focal nodular lesions of the skin.

Authors:  Antonio Corvino; Fabio Sandomenico; Fabio Corvino; Maria Raffaela Campanino; Francesco Verde; Francesco Giurazza; Domenico Tafuri; Orlando Catalano
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-03-29

Review 3.  Clinical features of soft tissue sarcoma presenting intra-tumour haematoma: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Manabu Hoshi; Naoto Oebisu; Makoto Ieguchi; Yoshitaka Ban; Masatsugu Takami; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Preoperatively determining the margins of subcutaneous malignant soft tissue tumours using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Sota Oguro; Kazutaka Kikuta; Aya Sasaki; Kiyoshi Okuma; Shunsuke Matsumoto; Hiroaki Sugiura; Hideo Morioka; Masaya Nakamura; Morio Matsumoto; Masahiro Jinzaki
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 1.314

5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal biopsies: our experience and technique.

Authors:  Steven P Daniels; Lori Mankowski Gettle; Donna G Blankenbaker; Kenneth S Lee; Andrew B Ross
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound and quantitative and qualitative real-time shear wave elastography in musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors.

Authors:  Ao Li; Xiao-Jing Peng; Qian Ma; Ye Dong; Cui-Lian Mao; Yu Hu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Nomogram Based on Ultrasonography and Clinical Features for Predicting Malignancy in Soft Tissue Tumors.

Authors:  Mengjie Wu; Yu Hu; Anjing Ren; Xiaojing Peng; Qian Ma; Cuilian Mao; Jing Hang; Ao Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Distinction between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors based on an ultrasonographic evaluation of vascularity and elasticity.

Authors:  Shusa Ohshika; Tatsuro Saruga; Tetsuya Ogawa; Hiroya Ono; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Preoperative Ultrasonographic Evaluation for Malignancy of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Takeshi Morii; Tomonori Kishino; Naoko Shimamori; Mitsue Motohashi; Hiroaki Ohnishi; Keita Honya; Takayuki Aoyagi; Takashi Tajima; Shoichi Ichimura
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2018-03-16

10.  Ultrasonographic findings and diagnosis of omental dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a case report.

Authors:  Takao Miwa; Kentaro Otsuji; Masashi Aiba; Takahiro Kochi; Katsuhisa Toda; Noriaki Nakamura; Naoki Katsumura; Tatsuhiko Miyazaki; Masahito Shimizu
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2020-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.