Literature DB >> 25109506

Estimation of geometrically undistorted B(0) inhomogeneity maps.

A Matakos1, J Balter, Y Cao.   

Abstract

Geometric accuracy of MRI is one of the main concerns for its use as a sole image modality in precision radiation therapy (RT) planning. In a state-of-the-art scanner, system level geometric distortions are within acceptable levels for precision RT. However, subject-induced B0 inhomogeneity may vary substantially, especially in air-tissue interfaces. Recent studies have shown distortion levels of more than 2 mm near the sinus and ear canal are possible due to subject-induced field inhomogeneity. These distortions can be corrected with the use of accurate B0 inhomogeneity field maps. Most existing methods estimate these field maps from dual gradient-echo (GRE) images acquired at two different echo-times under the assumption that the GRE images are practically undistorted. However distortion that may exist in the GRE images can result in estimated field maps that are distorted in both geometry and intensity, leading to inaccurate correction of clinical images. This work proposes a method for estimating undistorted field maps from GRE acquisitions using an iterative joint estimation technique. The proposed method yields geometrically corrected GRE images and undistorted field maps that can also be used for the correction of images acquired by other sequences. The proposed method is validated through simulation, phantom experiments and applied to patient data. Our simulation results show that our method reduces the root-mean-squared error of the estimated field map from the ground truth by ten-fold compared to the distorted field map. Both the geometric distortion and the intensity corruption (artifact) in the images caused by the B0 field inhomogeneity are corrected almost completely. Our phantom experiment showed improvement in the geometric correction of approximately 1 mm at an air-water interface using the undistorted field map compared to using a distorted field map. The proposed method for undistorted field map estimation can lead to improved geometric distortion correction at air-tissue interfaces, especially in low readout-bandwidth acquisitions, thus making them suitable for clinical use in precision RT without increasing the treatment planning margin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25109506      PMCID: PMC4159702          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/17/4945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  17 in total

1.  Real-time correction of magnetic field inhomogeneity-induced image distortions for MRI-guided conventional and proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  S P M Crijns; B W Raaymakers; J J W Lagendijk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs.

Authors:  J A Fessler; W L Rogers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 10.856

3.  A technique for accurate magnetic resonance imaging in the presence of field inhomogeneities.

Authors:  H Chang; J M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer.

Authors:  Karen Lim; William Small; Lorraine Portelance; Carien Creutzberg; Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; Arno Mundt; Loren K Mell; Nina Mayr; Akila Viswanathan; Anuja Jhingran; Beth Erickson; Jennifer De los Santos; David Gaffney; Catheryn Yashar; Sushil Beriwal; Aaron Wolfson; Alexandra Taylor; Walter Bosch; Issam El Naqa; Anthony Fyles
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A two-step scheme for distortion rectification of magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Lesley N Baldwin; Keith Wachowicz; B Gino Fallone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations.

Authors:  P Jezzard; R S Balaban
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The influence of MRI scan position on image registration accuracy, target delineation and calculated dose in prostatic radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Hanvey; A H Sadozye; M McJury; M Glegg; J Foster
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Regularized field map estimation in MRI.

Authors:  Amanda K Funai; Jeffrey A Fessler; Desmond T B Yeo; Valur T Olafsson; Douglas C Noll
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Radiotherapy of liver metastases. Comparison of target volumes and dose-volume histograms employing CT- or MRI-based treatment planning.

Authors:  Maciej Pech; Konrad Mohnike; Gero Wieners; Ewa Bialek; Oliver Dudeck; Max Seidensticker; Nils Peters; Peter Wust; Günther Gademann; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Patient-induced susceptibility effect on geometric distortion of clinical brain MRI for radiation treatment planning on a 3T scanner.

Authors:  H Wang; J Balter; Y Cao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Multiatlas approach with local registration goodness weighting for MRI-based electron density mapping of head and neck anatomy.

Authors:  Reza Farjam; Neelam Tyagi; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya Apte; Kristen Zakian; Margie A Hunt; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT for magnetic resonance-only based radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.

Authors:  Hesheng Wang; Hersh Chandarana; Kai Tobias Block; Thomas Vahle; Matthias Fenchel; Indra J Das
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  A Robust Method for Estimating B0 Inhomogeneity Field in the Liver by Mitigating Fat Signals and Phase-Wrapping.

Authors:  Antonis Matakos; James M Balter; Yue Cao
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2017-06

5.  Stereotactic radiosurgery planning of vestibular schwannomas: Is MRI at 3 Tesla geometrically accurate?

Authors:  M A Schmidt; E J Wells; K Davison; A M Riddell; L Welsh; F Saran
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Prospective analysis of in vivo landmark point-based MRI geometric distortion in head and neck cancer patients scanned in immobilized radiation treatment position: Results of a prospective quality assurance protocol.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-10-10

7.  Optimizing MRI sequences and images for MRI-based stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning.

Authors:  Somayeh Taghizadeh; Cecille Labuda; Claus Chunli Yang; Bart Morris; Madhava R Kanakamedala; Srinivasan Vijayakumar; Roberto Rey-Dios; William N Duggar; Edward Florez; Ali Fatemi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-10-10

8.  Quantitative assessment of the susceptibility artefact and its interaction with motion in diffusion MRI.

Authors:  Mark S Graham; Ivana Drobnjak; Mark Jenkinson; Hui Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.