Literature DB >> 25108660

A framework to integrate habitat monitoring and restoration with endangered insect recovery.

Jason Bried1, Tim Tear, Rebecca Shirer, Chris Zimmerman, Neil Gifford, Steve Campbell, Kathy O'Brien.   

Abstract

Monitoring is essential to track the long-term recovery of endangered species. Greater emphasis on habitat monitoring is especially important for taxa whose populations may be difficult to quantify (e.g., insects) or when true recovery (delisting) requires continuous species-specific habitat management. In this paper, we outline and implement a standardized framework to facilitate the integration of habitat monitoring with species recovery efforts. The framework has five parts: (1) identify appropriate sample units, (2) select measurable indicators of habitat requirements, (3) determine rating categories for these indicators, (4) design and implement appropriate data collection protocols, and (5) synthesize the ratings into an overall measure of habitat potential. Following these steps, we developed a set of recovery criteria to estimate habitat potential and initially assess restoration activities in the context of recovering an endangered insect, the Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeides melissa samuelis). We recommend basing the habitat potential grading scheme on recovery plan criteria, the latest information on species biology, and working hypotheses as needed. The habitat-based assessment framework helps to identify which recovery areas and habitat patches are worth investing in and what type of site-specific restoration work is needed. We propose that the transparency and decision-making process in endangered insect recovery efforts could be improved through adaptive management that explicitly identifies and tracks progress toward habitat objectives and ultimate population recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25108660     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0351-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  12 in total

1.  Local extinction of dragonfly and damselfly populations in low- and high-quality habitat patches.

Authors:  Jukka Suhonen; Milla Hilli-Lukkarinen; Esa Korkeamäki; Markku Kuitunen; Johanna Kullas; Jouni Penttinen; Jukka Salmela
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 6.560

2.  The route to best science in implementation of the Endangered Species Act's consultation mandate: the benefits of structured effects analysis.

Authors:  Dennis D Murphy; Paul S Weiland
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Ecology. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts.

Authors:  E S Bernhardt; M A Palmer; J D Allan; G Alexander; K Barnas; S Brooks; J Carr; S Clayton; C Dahm; J Follstad-Shah; D Galat; S Gloss; P Goodwin; D Hart; B Hassett; R Jenkinson; S Katz; G M Kondolf; P S Lake; R Lave; J L Meyer; T K O'donnell; L Pagano; B Powell; E Sudduth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Developing a monitoring program for invertebrates: guidelines and a case study.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Carolyn G Mahan; Ke Chung Kim
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Delaying conservation actions for improved knowledge: how long should we wait?

Authors:  Hedley S Grantham; Kerrie A Wilson; Atte Moilanen; Tony Rebelo; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Adaptive monitoring in the real world: proof of concept.

Authors:  David B Lindenmayer; Gene E Likens; Andrew Haywood; Lee Miezis
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  The effect of canopy cover and seasonal change on host plant quality for the endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaeidesmelissasamuelis).

Authors:  Ralph Grundel; Noel B Pavlovic; Christina L Sulzman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  A strategy for prioritizing threats and recovery actions for at-risk species.

Authors:  Catherine R Darst; Philip J Murphy; Nathan W Strout; Steven P Campbell; Kimberleigh J Field; Linda Allison; Roy C Averill-Murray
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.266

9.  Toward consensus-based actions that balance invasive plant management and conservation of at-risk fauna.

Authors:  John A Litvaitis; Jeffrey L Norment; Kelly Boland; Kate O'Brien; Rachel Stevens; Donald Keirstead; Thomas Lee; James D Oehler; Jeffery M Taylor; Susan Bickford; Matthew D Tarr
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting.

Authors:  Edward T Game; Peter Kareiva; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.560

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.