Literature DB >> 17391192

Developing a monitoring program for invertebrates: guidelines and a case study.

Jason R Rohr1, Carolyn G Mahan, Ke Chung Kim.   

Abstract

Invertebrates provide the majority of ecosystem services; thus, it is important that they be inventoried, monitored, and protected. Nevertheless, inventories, monitoring, and management generally focus on vertebrates and flowering plants. Consequently, there are few guidelines or case studies for invertebrates. We present a procedure for developing a monitoring program for species-rich invertebrates that entails (1) characterizing the community; (2) identifying surrogates for biodiversity; and (3) establishing efficient methods to monitor surrogates and any ecologically important or sensitive taxa. We used these procedures, biodiversity-based statistical advances, and a survey of arthropods to develop a monitoring plan for the forests of Shenandoah National Park, Virginia (U.S.A.). Our case study revealed that mixed hardwood and hemlock forests had significantly different compositions of arthropods in their soil and understory strata. Of the 10 orders tested Coleoptera and Hymenoptera were the only two to pass most of the five surrogate tests, and their combination improved predictions of overall arthropod diversity. Because arthropods represent the majority of macroscopic species in most ecosystems, the ability of this assemblage to predict overall arthropod diversity makes it a powerful surrogate. Of the 11 collecting methods used, the beat-sheet method was the most efficient for monitoring this surrogate assemblage. To complement this coarse-filter approach to monitoring at-risk, invasive, or other important taxa (fine filter), we used ordination analyses to match 66 taxa with the methods that most effectively sampled them. Our methods serve as a model for developing an invertebrate monitoring plan and should facilitate linking such monitoring with ecosystem functions and management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17391192     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  9 in total

1.  Pesticide alters habitat selection and aquatic community composition.

Authors:  James R Vonesh; Johanna M Kraus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Circumpolar terrestrial arthropod monitoring: A review of ongoing activities, opportunities and challenges, with a focus on spiders.

Authors:  Mark A K Gillespie; Matthias Alfredsson; Isabel C Barrio; Joe Bowden; Peter Convey; Stephen J Coulson; Lauren E Culler; Martin T Dahl; Kathryn M Daly; Seppo Koponen; Sarah Loboda; Yuri Marusik; Jonas P Sandström; Derek S Sikes; Jozef Slowik; Toke T Høye
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Transforming ecosystems: When, where, and how to restore contaminated sites.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Aïda M Farag; Marc W Cadotte; William H Clements; James R Smith; Cheryl P Ulrich; Richard Woods
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  Step process for selecting and testing surrogates and indicators of afrotemperate forest invertebrate diversity.

Authors:  Charmaine Uys; Michelle Hamer; Rob Slotow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Variation in the Abundance of Neotropical Bees in an Unpredictable Seasonal Environment.

Authors:  F R N Knoll
Journal:  Neotrop Entomol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.434

6.  A framework to integrate habitat monitoring and restoration with endangered insect recovery.

Authors:  Jason Bried; Tim Tear; Rebecca Shirer; Chris Zimmerman; Neil Gifford; Steve Campbell; Kathy O'Brien
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) richness, diversity, and community structure in the understory of temporarily flooded and non-flooded Amazonian forests of Ecuador.

Authors:  Kathryn N Riley Peterson; Robert A Browne; Terry L Erwin
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.546

8.  Social-ecological filters drive the functional diversity of beetles in homegardens of campesinos and migrants in the southern Andes.

Authors:  José Tomás Ibarra; Julián Caviedes; Tomás A Altamirano; Romina Urra; Antonia Barreau; Francisca Santana
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Implications of global climate change for natural resource damage assessment, restoration, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jason R Rohr; Philip Johnson; Christopher W Hickey; Roger C Helm; Alyce Fritz; Sandra Brasfield
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.