Literature DB >> 25108221

Response of human limbal epithelial cells to wounding on 3D RAFT tissue equivalents: effect of airlifting and human limbal fibroblasts.

Isobel Massie1, Hannah J Levis2, Julie T Daniels3.   

Abstract

Limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency can cause blindness but may be treated by human limbal epithelial cell (hLE) transplantation, normally on human amniotic membrane. Clinical outcomes using amnion can be unreliable and so we have developed an alternative tissue equivalent (TE), RAFT (Real Architecture for 3D Tissue), which supports hLE expansion, and stratification when airlifted. Human limbal fibroblasts (hLF) may be incorporated into RAFT TEs, where they support overlying hLE and improve phenotype. However, the impact of neither airlifting nor hLF on hLE function has been investigated. hLE on RAFT TEshLF and airlifting) were wounded using heptanol and re-epithelialisation (fluorescein diacetate staining), and percentage putative stem cell marker p63α and proliferative marker Ki67 expression (wholemount immunohistochemistry), measured. Airlifted, hLF- RAFT TEs were unable to close the wound and p63α expression was 7 ± 0.2% after wounding. Conversely, non-airlifted, hLF- RAFT TEs closed the wound within 9 days and p63α expression was higher at 22 ± 5% (p < 0.01). hLE on both hLF- and hLF+ RAFT TEs (non-airlifted) closed the wound and p63α expression was 26 ± 8% and 36 ± 3% respectively (ns). Ki67 expression by hLE increased from 1.3 ± 0.5% before wounding to 7.89 ± 2.53% post-wounding for hLF- RAFT TEs (p < 0.01), and 0.8 ± 0.08% to 17.68 ± 10.88% for hLF+ RAFT TEs (p < 0.05), suggesting that re-epithelialisation was a result of proliferation. These data suggest that neither airlifting nor hLF are necessarily required to maintain a functional epithelium on RAFT TEs, thus simplifying and shortening the production process. This is important when working towards clinical application of regenerative medicine products.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D wound model; cell therapy; cornea; limbal epithelial stem cell; limbal fibroblast; limbus; regenerative medicine; tissue-engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25108221     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  10 in total

Review 1.  3D Microfabricated Scaffolds and Microfluidic Devices for Ocular Surface Replacement: a Review.

Authors:  Elisabetta Prina; Pritesh Mistry; Laura E Sidney; Jing Yang; Ricky D Wildman; Marina Bertolin; Claudia Breda; Barbara Ferrari; Vanessa Barbaro; Andrew Hopkinson; Harminder S Dua; Stefano Ferrari; Felicity R A J Rose
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.739

Review 2.  Engineering epithelial-stromal interactions in vitro for toxicology assessment.

Authors:  David G Belair; Barbara D Abbott
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 3.  Corneal pain and experimental model development.

Authors:  Tina B McKay; Yashar Seyed-Razavi; Chiara E Ghezzi; Gabriela Dieckmann; Thomas J F Nieland; Dana M Cairns; Rachel E Pollard; Pedram Hamrah; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 21.198

4.  Tcf7l2 localization of putative stem/progenitor cells in mouse conjunctiva.

Authors:  Yadan Quan; Xinchun Zhang; Siying Xu; Kang Li; Feng Zhu; Qian Li; Xianxian Cai; Rong Lu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.249

Review 5.  Modeling the cornea in 3-dimensions: Current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Tina B McKay; Audrey E K Hutcheon; Xiaoqing Guo; James D Zieske; Dimitrios Karamichos
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.770

Review 6.  Tissue Engineering the Cornea: The Evolution of RAFT.

Authors:  Hannah J Levis; Alvena K Kureshi; Isobel Massie; Louise Morgan; Amanda J Vernon; Julie T Daniels
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2015-01-22

7.  Compressed Collagen Enhances Stem Cell Therapy for Corneal Scarring.

Authors:  Golnar Shojaati; Irona Khandaker; Kyle Sylakowski; Martha L Funderburgh; Yiqin Du; James L Funderburgh
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  In Vitro Cultivation of Limbal Epithelial Stem Cells on Surface-Modified Crosslinked Collagen Scaffolds.

Authors:  Michel Haagdorens; Vytautas Cėpla; Eline Melsbach; Laura Koivusalo; Heli Skottman; May Griffith; Ramūnas Valiokas; Nadia Zakaria; Isabel Pintelon; Marie-José Tassignon
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.443

9.  Optimization of optical and mechanical properties of real architecture for 3-dimensional tissue equivalents: Towards treatment of limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency.

Authors:  Isobel Massie; Alvena K Kureshi; Stefan Schrader; Alex J Shortt; Julie T Daniels
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 10.  Ex vivo cultivated oral mucosal epithelial cell transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency: a review.

Authors:  Joao Victor Cabral; Catherine Joan Jackson; Tor Paaske Utheim; Katerina Jirsova
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 6.832

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.