Literature DB >> 25107518

Tests of measurement invariance without subgroups: a generalization of classical methods.

Edgar C Merkle1, Achim Zeileis.   

Abstract

The issue of measurement invariance commonly arises in factor-analytic contexts, with methods for assessment including likelihood ratio tests, Lagrange multiplier tests, and Wald tests. These tests all require advance definition of the number of groups, group membership, and offending model parameters. In this paper, we study tests of measurement invariance based on stochastic processes of casewise derivatives of the likelihood function. These tests can be viewed as generalizations of the Lagrange multiplier test, and they are especially useful for: (i) identifying subgroups of individuals that violate measurement invariance along a continuous auxiliary variable without prespecified thresholds, and (ii) identifying specific parameters impacted by measurement invariance violations. The tests are presented and illustrated in detail, including an application to a study of stereotype threat and simulations examining the tests' abilities in controlled conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 25107518     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-012-9302-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  15 in total

1.  On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

Authors:  Robert C MacCallum; Shaobo Zhang; Kristopher J Preacher; Derek D Rucker
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2002-03

2.  Variance components models for gene-environment interaction in twin analysis.

Authors:  Shaun Purcell
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2002-12

3.  A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research.

Authors:  J L Horn; J J McArdle
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1992 Autumn-Winter       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 4.  Methodological issues in the assessment of substance use phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Steven H Aggen; Hermine H Maes; Thomas S Kubarych; J Eric Schmitt
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  When does measurement invariance matter?

Authors:  Denny Borsboom
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-11

7.  Factorial Invariance and The Specification of Second-Order Latent Growth Models.

Authors:  Emilio Ferrer; Nekane Balluerka; Keith F Widaman
Journal:  Methodology (Gott)       Date:  2008

Review 8.  Latent variable modeling of differences and changes with longitudinal data.

Authors:  John J McArdle
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Binary recursive partitioning: background, methods, and application to psychology.

Authors:  Edgar C Merkle; Victoria A Shaffer
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework.

Authors:  Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.500

View more
  15 in total

1.  Rasch Trees: A New Method for Detecting Differential Item Functioning in the Rasch Model.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Julia Kopf; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Testing for measurement invariance with respect to an ordinal variable.

Authors:  Edgar C Merkle; Jinyan Fan; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A penalty approach to differential item functioning in Rasch models.

Authors:  Gerhard Tutz; Gunther Schauberger
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Covariate-free and Covariate-dependent Reliability.

Authors:  Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Tree-Based Global Model Tests for Polytomous Rasch Models.

Authors:  Basil Komboz; Carolin Strobl; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  Heteroscedastic Latent Trait Models for Dichotomous Data.

Authors:  Dylan Molenaar
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Psychometrically improved, abbreviated versions of three classic measures of impulsivity and self-control.

Authors:  Meghan E Morean; Kelly S DeMartini; Robert F Leeman; Godfrey D Pearlson; Alan Anticevic; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; John H Krystal; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2014-06-02

8.  Network Trees: A Method for Recursively Partitioning Covariance Structures.

Authors:  Payton J Jones; Patrick Mair; Thorsten Simon; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Score-Based Tests of Differential Item Functioning via Pairwise Maximum Likelihood Estimation.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Carolin Strobl; Achim Zeileis; Edgar C Merkle
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning.

Authors:  Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2016-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.